Generating Stochastic Structural Planes Using Statistical Models and Generative Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Investigation

被引:1
|
作者
Meng, Han [1 ]
Xu, Nengxiong [1 ]
Zhu, Yunfu [2 ]
Mei, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Geol Survey & Explorat Inst, Geol Environm Monitoring Inst, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock mass; stochastic structural planes; Monte Carlo method; Copula; deep learning; denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM); generative adversarial networks (GAN); RAINFALL DATA; DAM SITE; FRACTURE; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; GEOMETRY; BLOCKS;
D O I
10.3390/math12162545
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Structural planes are one of the key factors controlling the stability of rock masses. A comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution characteristics of structural planes is essential for accurately identifying key blocks, analyzing rock mass stability, and addressing various rock engineering challenges. This study compares the effectiveness of four stochastic structural plane generation methods-the Monte Carlo method, the Copula-based method, generative adversarial networks (GAN), and denoised diffusion models (DDPM)-in generating stochastic structural planes and capturing potential correlations between structural plane parameters. The Monte Carlo method employs the mean and variance of three parameters of the measured factual structural planes to generate data that follow the same distributions. The other three methods take the entire set of measured factual structural planes as the overall input to generate structural planes that exhibit the same probability distributions. Five sets of structural planes on four rock slopes in Norway are examined as an example. The validation and analysis were performed using histogram comparison, data feature comparison, scatter plot comparison, and linear regression analysis. The results show that the Monte Carlo method fails to capture the potential correlation between the dip direction and dip angle despite the best fit to the measured factual structural planes. The Copula-based method performs better with smaller datasets, and GAN and DDPM are better at capturing the correlation of measured factual structural planes in the case of large datasets. Therefore, in the case of a limited number of measured structural planes, it is advisable to employ the Copula-based method. In scenarios where the dataset is extensive, the deep generative model is recommended due to its ability to capture complex data structures. The results of this study can be utilized as a valuable point of reference for the accurate generation of stochastic structural planes within rock masses.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of daily global solar radiation prediction using deep learning models inputted with stochastic variables
    Yadav, Amit Kumar
    Kumar, Raj
    Wang, Meizi
    Fekete, Gusztav
    Singh, Tej
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [42] Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning and Statistical Models for Air Pollutants Prediction in Urban Areas
    Naz, Fareena
    Mccann, Conor
    Fahim, Muhammad
    Cao, Tuan-Vu
    Hunter, Ruth
    Viet, Nguyen Trung
    Nguyen, Long D.
    Duong, Trung Q.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 64016 - 64025
  • [43] Deep Generative Learning Models for Cloud Intrusion Detection Systems
    Ly Vu
    Quang Uy Nguyen
    Nguyen, N. Diep
    Dinh Thai Hoang
    Dutkiewicz, Eryk
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2023, 53 (01) : 565 - 577
  • [44] Turbulence scaling from deep learning diffusion generative models
    Whittaker, Tim
    Janik, Romuald A.
    Oz, Yaron
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2024, 514
  • [45] On the synthesis of visual illusions using deep generative models
    Gomez-Villa, Alex
    Martin, Adrian
    Vazquez-Corral, Javier
    Bertalmio, Marcelo
    Malo, Jesus
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2022, 22 (08):
  • [46] Discovering Binary Codes for Documents by Learning Deep Generative Models
    Hinton, Geoffrey
    Salakhutdinov, Ruslan
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2011, 3 (01) : 74 - 91
  • [47] Deep Generative Models for Data Synthesis and Augmentation in Machine Learning
    Adavala, Kiran Mayee
    Vhatkar, Sangeeta
    Ruprah, Taranpreet Singh
    Bhatia, Sukhwinder Kaur
    Kumar, Vipin
    Sharma, Dharmendra
    Praveen, B. Shyam
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 20 (03) : 1242 - 1249
  • [48] Group Anomaly Detection Using Deep Generative Models
    Chalapathy, Raghavendra
    Toth, Edward
    Chawla, Sanjay
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES, ECML PKDD 2018, PT I, 2019, 11051 : 173 - 189
  • [49] Semi-Supervised Learning for Deep Causal Generative Models
    Ibrahim, Yasin
    Warr, Hermione
    Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2024, PT XII, 2024, 15012 : 294 - 303
  • [50] Unbiased Learning of Deep Generative Models with Structured Discrete Representations
    Bendekgey, Harry
    Hope, Gabriel
    Sudderth, Erik B.
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 36 (NEURIPS 2023), 2023,