Generating Stochastic Structural Planes Using Statistical Models and Generative Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Investigation

被引:1
|
作者
Meng, Han [1 ]
Xu, Nengxiong [1 ]
Zhu, Yunfu [2 ]
Mei, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Geol Survey & Explorat Inst, Geol Environm Monitoring Inst, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock mass; stochastic structural planes; Monte Carlo method; Copula; deep learning; denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM); generative adversarial networks (GAN); RAINFALL DATA; DAM SITE; FRACTURE; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; GEOMETRY; BLOCKS;
D O I
10.3390/math12162545
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Structural planes are one of the key factors controlling the stability of rock masses. A comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution characteristics of structural planes is essential for accurately identifying key blocks, analyzing rock mass stability, and addressing various rock engineering challenges. This study compares the effectiveness of four stochastic structural plane generation methods-the Monte Carlo method, the Copula-based method, generative adversarial networks (GAN), and denoised diffusion models (DDPM)-in generating stochastic structural planes and capturing potential correlations between structural plane parameters. The Monte Carlo method employs the mean and variance of three parameters of the measured factual structural planes to generate data that follow the same distributions. The other three methods take the entire set of measured factual structural planes as the overall input to generate structural planes that exhibit the same probability distributions. Five sets of structural planes on four rock slopes in Norway are examined as an example. The validation and analysis were performed using histogram comparison, data feature comparison, scatter plot comparison, and linear regression analysis. The results show that the Monte Carlo method fails to capture the potential correlation between the dip direction and dip angle despite the best fit to the measured factual structural planes. The Copula-based method performs better with smaller datasets, and GAN and DDPM are better at capturing the correlation of measured factual structural planes in the case of large datasets. Therefore, in the case of a limited number of measured structural planes, it is advisable to employ the Copula-based method. In scenarios where the dataset is extensive, the deep generative model is recommended due to its ability to capture complex data structures. The results of this study can be utilized as a valuable point of reference for the accurate generation of stochastic structural planes within rock masses.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Training and Evaluation of Deep Policies Using Reinforcement Learning and Generative Models
    Ghadirzadeh, Ali
    Poklukar, Petra
    Arndt, Karol
    Finn, Chelsea
    Kyrki, Ville
    Kragic, Danica
    Bjorkman, Marten
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2022, 23
  • [22] InvNet: Encoding Geometric and Statistical Invariances in Deep Generative Models
    Joshi, Ameya
    Cho, Minsu
    Shah, Viraj
    Pokuri, Balaji
    Sarkar, Soumik
    Ganapathysubramanian, Baskar
    Hegde, Chinmay
    THIRTY-FOURTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THE THIRTY-SECOND INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE AND THE TENTH AAAI SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 34 : 4377 - 4384
  • [23] Generating real-world hypergraphs via deep generative models
    Zuo, Xianglin
    Chen, Wenqi
    Song, Xianduo
    Wang, Xin
    Wang, Ying
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 647
  • [24] Probabilistic forecasting using deep generative models
    Alessandro Fanfarillo
    Behrooz Roozitalab
    Weiming Hu
    Guido Cervone
    GeoInformatica, 2021, 25 : 127 - 147
  • [25] Unsupervised learning of global factors in deep generative models
    Peis, Ignacio
    Olmos, Pablo M.
    Artes-Rodriguez, Antonio
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2022, 134
  • [26] Probabilistic forecasting using deep generative models
    Fanfarillo, Alessandro
    Roozitalab, Behrooz
    Hu, Weiming
    Cervone, Guido
    GEOINFORMATICA, 2021, 25 (01) : 127 - 147
  • [27] Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Models
    Xiao, Shuai
    Farajtabar, Mehrdad
    Ye, Xiaojing
    Yang, Junchi
    Song, Le
    Zha, Hongyuan
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017, 30
  • [28] Learning Deep Generative Spatial Models for Mobile Robots
    Pronobis, Andrzej
    Rao, Rajesh P. N.
    2017 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2017, : 755 - 762
  • [29] Learning Hierarchical Features from Deep Generative Models
    Zhao, Shengjia
    Song, Jiaming
    Ermon, Stefano
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 70, 2017, 70
  • [30] Semi-supervised Learning with Deep Generative Models
    Kingma, Diederik P.
    Rezende, Danilo J.
    Mohamed, Shakir
    Welling, Max
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 27 (NIPS 2014), 2014, 27