Generating Stochastic Structural Planes Using Statistical Models and Generative Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Investigation

被引:1
|
作者
Meng, Han [1 ]
Xu, Nengxiong [1 ]
Zhu, Yunfu [2 ]
Mei, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Geol Survey & Explorat Inst, Geol Environm Monitoring Inst, Nanchang 330006, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock mass; stochastic structural planes; Monte Carlo method; Copula; deep learning; denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM); generative adversarial networks (GAN); RAINFALL DATA; DAM SITE; FRACTURE; DISTRIBUTIONS; SIMULATION; GEOMETRY; BLOCKS;
D O I
10.3390/math12162545
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Structural planes are one of the key factors controlling the stability of rock masses. A comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution characteristics of structural planes is essential for accurately identifying key blocks, analyzing rock mass stability, and addressing various rock engineering challenges. This study compares the effectiveness of four stochastic structural plane generation methods-the Monte Carlo method, the Copula-based method, generative adversarial networks (GAN), and denoised diffusion models (DDPM)-in generating stochastic structural planes and capturing potential correlations between structural plane parameters. The Monte Carlo method employs the mean and variance of three parameters of the measured factual structural planes to generate data that follow the same distributions. The other three methods take the entire set of measured factual structural planes as the overall input to generate structural planes that exhibit the same probability distributions. Five sets of structural planes on four rock slopes in Norway are examined as an example. The validation and analysis were performed using histogram comparison, data feature comparison, scatter plot comparison, and linear regression analysis. The results show that the Monte Carlo method fails to capture the potential correlation between the dip direction and dip angle despite the best fit to the measured factual structural planes. The Copula-based method performs better with smaller datasets, and GAN and DDPM are better at capturing the correlation of measured factual structural planes in the case of large datasets. Therefore, in the case of a limited number of measured structural planes, it is advisable to employ the Copula-based method. In scenarios where the dataset is extensive, the deep generative model is recommended due to its ability to capture complex data structures. The results of this study can be utilized as a valuable point of reference for the accurate generation of stochastic structural planes within rock masses.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generating Stochastic Structural Planes by Considering Parameter Correlations Using Deep Generative Adversarial Networks
    Han Meng
    Gang Mei
    Xiaoyu Qi
    Nengxiong Xu
    Jianbing Peng
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2023, 56 : 9215 - 9230
  • [2] Generating Stochastic Structural Planes by Considering Parameter Correlations Using Deep Generative Adversarial Networks
    Meng, Han
    Mei, Gang
    Qi, Xiaoyu
    Xu, Nengxiong
    Peng, Jianbing
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2023, 56 (12) : 9215 - 9230
  • [3] Learning Deep Generative Models With Doubly Stochastic Gradient MCMC
    Du, Chao
    Zhu, Jun
    Zhang, Bo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2018, 29 (07) : 3084 - 3096
  • [4] Learning Deep Generative Models
    Salakhutdinov, Ruslan
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 2, 2015, 2 : 361 - 385
  • [5] A Survey on Statistical Theory of Deep Learning: Approximation, Training Dynamics, and Generative Models
    Suh, Namjoon
    Cheng, Guang
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, 2025, 12 : 177 - 207
  • [6] Conditional generative models for learning stochastic processes
    Certo, Salvatore
    Pham, Anh
    Robles, Nicolas
    Vlasic, Andrew
    QUANTUM MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 5 (02)
  • [7] Conditional generative models for learning stochastic processes
    Salvatore Certo
    Anh Pham
    Nicolas Robles
    Andrew Vlasic
    Quantum Machine Intelligence, 2023, 5
  • [8] Affibody Sequence Design Using Deep Learning Generative Models
    Wang, Zirui
    Mardikoraem, Mehrsa
    Woldring, Daniel
    PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2023, 32
  • [9] Toward the Identifiability of Comparative Deep Generative Models
    Lopez, Romain
    Huetter, Jan-Christian
    Hajiramezanali, Ehsan
    Pritchard, Jonathan K.
    Regev, Aviv
    CAUSAL LEARNING AND REASONING, VOL 236, 2024, 236 : 868 - 912
  • [10] Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative Models
    Rezende, Danilo Jimenez
    Mohamed, Shakir
    Wierstra, Daan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 32 (CYCLE 2), 2014, 32 : 1278 - 1286