Exploring implementation of intrapartum trial evidence: a qualitative study with clinicians and clinical academics

被引:0
|
作者
Cross-Sudworth, Fiona [1 ]
Dharni, Nimarta [1 ]
Kenyon, Sara [1 ]
Lilford, Richard [1 ]
Taylor, Beck [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Appl Hlth Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Univ Rd, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
来源
关键词
Implementation science; Maternal health services; Obstetric analgesia; Obstetric labor; MULTICENTER; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-024-00647-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundImplementing research evidence into clinical practice is challenging. This study aim was to explore implementation of two intrapartum trials with compelling findings: BUMPES (position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with epidural), and RESPITE (remifentanil intravenous patient-controlled analgesia).MethodsA qualitative interview study set in UK National Health Service Trusts and Universities. Purposively sampled investigators from RESPITE and BUMPES trials and clinicians providing intrapartum care: midwives, anaesthetists, and obstetricians, were recruited using existing networks and snowball sampling. Semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was underpinned by Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour Change Framework.ResultsTwenty-nine interview participants across 19 maternity units: 11 clinical academics, 10 midwives, 4 obstetricians, 4 anaesthetists. Most (25/29) were aware of one or both trials. BUMPES had been implemented in 4/19 units (one original trial site) and RESPITE in 3/19 units (two trial sites). Access to sufficient resources, training, exposure to interventions, support from leaders, and post-trial dissemination and implementation activities all facilitated uptake of interventions. Some clinicians were opposed to the intervention or disagreed with trial conclusions. However competing priorities in terms of staff time and a plethora of initiatives in maternity care, emerged as a key barrier to implementation.ConclusionsCompelling trial findings were not implemented widely, and numerous barriers and facilitators were identified. Large-scale improvement programmes and evidence-based national guidelines may mean single trials have limited potential to change practice. There is a need to examine how intervention implementation is prioritised to optimise safety outcomes in the context of workforce restrictions, limited resources and large arrays of competing priorities including statutory requirements, that have increased in maternity care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacy academics' perspectives toward interprofessional Education prior to its implementation in Qatar: a qualitative study
    El-Awaisi, Alla
    Joseph, Sundari
    El Hajj, Maguy Saffouh
    Diack, Lesley
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1) : 278
  • [42] Clinicians' perspectives on the implementation of patient decision aids in the emergency department: A qualitative interview study
    Billah, Tausif
    Gordon, Lauren
    Schoenfeld, Elizabeth M.
    Chang, Bernard P.
    Hess, Erik P.
    Probst, Marc A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2022, 3 (01)
  • [43] User-centered Design in Clinical Handover: Exploring Post-Implementation Outcomes for Clinicians
    Wong, Ming Chao
    Cummings, Elizabeth
    Turner, Paul
    MEDINFO 2013: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 192 : 253 - 257
  • [44] Implementation of a pilot telehealth programme in community palliative care: A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives
    Collier, Aileen
    Morgan, Deidre D.
    Swetenham, Kate
    To, Timothy H. M.
    Currow, David C.
    Tieman, Jennifer J.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (04) : 409 - 417
  • [45] Pharmacy academics’ perspectives toward interprofessional Education prior to its implementation in Qatar: a qualitative study
    Alla El-Awaisi
    Sundari Joseph
    Maguy Saffouh El Hajj
    Lesley Diack
    BMC Medical Education, 19
  • [46] Clinicians' cognitive biases: a potential barrier to implementation of evidence-based clinical practice
    Dobler, Claudia Caroline
    Morrow, Allison S.
    Kamath, Celia C.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2019, 24 (04) : 137 - 140
  • [47] A qualitative study of a sample of women participating in an Australian randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal surveillance
    Benton, Madeleine
    Salter, Amy
    Simpson, Bronni
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Turnbull, Deborah
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 83
  • [48] Should I stay or should I go? A qualitative study exploring participation in a urology clinical trial
    Mabel Leng Sim Lie
    Jan Lecouturier
    Christopher Harding
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2019, 30 : 9 - 16
  • [49] Should I stay or should I go? A qualitative study exploring participation in a urology clinical trial
    Lie, Mabel Leng Sim
    Lecouturier, Jan
    Harding, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [50] Navigating complexities: clinicians' experiences and systemic challenges in the implementation of evidence-based practice for chronic low back pain - a qualitative study
    Walker, Emily D.
    Gibbs, Mitchell T.
    Natoli, Andrew R.
    Jones, Matthew D.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,