Exploring implementation of intrapartum trial evidence: a qualitative study with clinicians and clinical academics

被引:0
|
作者
Cross-Sudworth, Fiona [1 ]
Dharni, Nimarta [1 ]
Kenyon, Sara [1 ]
Lilford, Richard [1 ]
Taylor, Beck [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Appl Hlth Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Univ Rd, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
来源
关键词
Implementation science; Maternal health services; Obstetric analgesia; Obstetric labor; MULTICENTER; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-024-00647-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundImplementing research evidence into clinical practice is challenging. This study aim was to explore implementation of two intrapartum trials with compelling findings: BUMPES (position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with epidural), and RESPITE (remifentanil intravenous patient-controlled analgesia).MethodsA qualitative interview study set in UK National Health Service Trusts and Universities. Purposively sampled investigators from RESPITE and BUMPES trials and clinicians providing intrapartum care: midwives, anaesthetists, and obstetricians, were recruited using existing networks and snowball sampling. Semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was underpinned by Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour Change Framework.ResultsTwenty-nine interview participants across 19 maternity units: 11 clinical academics, 10 midwives, 4 obstetricians, 4 anaesthetists. Most (25/29) were aware of one or both trials. BUMPES had been implemented in 4/19 units (one original trial site) and RESPITE in 3/19 units (two trial sites). Access to sufficient resources, training, exposure to interventions, support from leaders, and post-trial dissemination and implementation activities all facilitated uptake of interventions. Some clinicians were opposed to the intervention or disagreed with trial conclusions. However competing priorities in terms of staff time and a plethora of initiatives in maternity care, emerged as a key barrier to implementation.ConclusionsCompelling trial findings were not implemented widely, and numerous barriers and facilitators were identified. Large-scale improvement programmes and evidence-based national guidelines may mean single trials have limited potential to change practice. There is a need to examine how intervention implementation is prioritised to optimise safety outcomes in the context of workforce restrictions, limited resources and large arrays of competing priorities including statutory requirements, that have increased in maternity care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinicians’ evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study
    Reidun Førde
    Reidar Pedersen
    Victoria Akre
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2008, 11 : 17 - 25
  • [22] Clinicians' evaluation of clinical ethics consultations in Norway: a qualitative study
    Forde, Reidun
    Pedersen, Reidar
    Akre, Victoria
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 11 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [23] Evidence-based intrapartum care in Cali, Colombia:: a quantitative and qualitative study
    Conde-Agudelo, A.
    Rosas-Bermudez, A.
    Guelmezoglu, A. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (12) : 1547 - 1556
  • [24] Implementation of patient involvement methods in the clinical setting: A qualitative study exploring the health professional perspective
    Jorgensen, Marianne Johansson
    Pedersen, Charlotte Gjorup
    Martin, Helle Max
    Lomborg, Kirsten
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (03) : 765 - 776
  • [25] Translating Clinical Research to Clinical Care in Nephrology: A Qualitative Study of Nephrology Clinicians
    Ravyn, Dana
    Goodwin, Beth
    Lowney, Rob
    Chapman, Arlene
    KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2022, 4 (05)
  • [26] A Qualitative Study of Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers to Implementation of Treat to Target in Psoriatic Arthritis
    Taylor, Julie
    Coates, Laura
    Dures, Emma
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [27] Exploring ambulance clinicians' clinical reasoning when training mass casualty incidents using virtual reality: a qualitative study
    Heldring, S.
    Lindstrom, V.
    Jirwe, M.
    Wihlborg, J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 32 (01):
  • [28] Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program A Qualitative Study
    Lagrotteria, Andrew
    Swinton, Marilyn
    Simon, Jessica
    King, Seema
    Boryski, Gwenn
    Ma, Irene Wai Yan
    Dunne, Fiona
    Singh, Japteg
    Bernacki, Rachelle E.
    You, John J.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (08)
  • [29] Qualitative study exploring clinicians' experience of participating in a feasibility trial investigating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in traumatic brain injury
    Sahu, Bithi
    Smith, Rebecca
    Burgess, Caroline
    Marsden, Jonathan
    Seemungal, Barry
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429
  • [30] Academic-clinical collaborative partnerships: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of nurse academics, clinicians, and students
    Dirik, Hasan Fehmi
    Yildirim, Menevse
    Ozmen, Sinem
    Intepeler, Seyda Seren
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2025, 149