Exploring implementation of intrapartum trial evidence: a qualitative study with clinicians and clinical academics

被引:0
|
作者
Cross-Sudworth, Fiona [1 ]
Dharni, Nimarta [1 ]
Kenyon, Sara [1 ]
Lilford, Richard [1 ]
Taylor, Beck [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Appl Hlth Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Univ Rd, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
来源
关键词
Implementation science; Maternal health services; Obstetric analgesia; Obstetric labor; MULTICENTER; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-024-00647-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundImplementing research evidence into clinical practice is challenging. This study aim was to explore implementation of two intrapartum trials with compelling findings: BUMPES (position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with epidural), and RESPITE (remifentanil intravenous patient-controlled analgesia).MethodsA qualitative interview study set in UK National Health Service Trusts and Universities. Purposively sampled investigators from RESPITE and BUMPES trials and clinicians providing intrapartum care: midwives, anaesthetists, and obstetricians, were recruited using existing networks and snowball sampling. Semi-structured virtual interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was underpinned by Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour Change Framework.ResultsTwenty-nine interview participants across 19 maternity units: 11 clinical academics, 10 midwives, 4 obstetricians, 4 anaesthetists. Most (25/29) were aware of one or both trials. BUMPES had been implemented in 4/19 units (one original trial site) and RESPITE in 3/19 units (two trial sites). Access to sufficient resources, training, exposure to interventions, support from leaders, and post-trial dissemination and implementation activities all facilitated uptake of interventions. Some clinicians were opposed to the intervention or disagreed with trial conclusions. However competing priorities in terms of staff time and a plethora of initiatives in maternity care, emerged as a key barrier to implementation.ConclusionsCompelling trial findings were not implemented widely, and numerous barriers and facilitators were identified. Large-scale improvement programmes and evidence-based national guidelines may mean single trials have limited potential to change practice. There is a need to examine how intervention implementation is prioritised to optimise safety outcomes in the context of workforce restrictions, limited resources and large arrays of competing priorities including statutory requirements, that have increased in maternity care.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring implementation outcomes in the clinical trial context: a qualitative study of physician trial stakeholders
    Kristian D. Stensland
    Anne E. Sales
    Varsha K. Vedapudi
    Laura J. Damschroder
    Ted A. Skolarus
    Trials, 24
  • [2] Exploring implementation outcomes in the clinical trial context: a qualitative study of physician trial stakeholders
    Stensland, Kristian D. D.
    Sales, Anne E. E.
    Vedapudi, Varsha K. K.
    Damschroder, Laura J. J.
    Skolarus, Ted A. A.
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [3] Evaluation of PROM implementation in clinical practice: a qualitative study with clinicians
    Groenewegen, Anouk
    van Muilekom, Maud
    Sieben, Cenne
    Beurskens, Sandra
    Smeulers, Marian
    Haverman, Lotte
    van Oers, Hedy
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 : S30 - S31
  • [4] Assessment of Upper Limb Lymphedema: A Qualitative Study Exploring Clinicians' Clinical Reasoning
    Sierla, Robyn
    Dylke, Elizabeth S.
    Shaw, Tim
    Poon, Simon
    Kilbreath, Sharon L.
    LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 19 (02) : 151 - 158
  • [5] Clinicians’ views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study
    Celine Y. Chhoa
    Alexandra Sawyer
    Susan Ayers
    Angela Pushpa-Rajah
    Lelia Duley
    Trials, 18
  • [6] Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study
    Chhoa, Celine Y.
    Sawyer, Alexandra
    Ayers, Susan
    Pushpa-Rajah, Angela
    Duley, Lelia
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [7] A qualitative study of clinicians' experience of a clinical trial for displaced distal radius fractures
    Phelps, E. E.
    Tutton, E.
    Costa, M. L.
    Achten, J.
    Gibson, P.
    Perry, D. C.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (04): : 324 - 334
  • [8] A qualitative study exploring clinicians' views on clinical trials in thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis
    Dean, B. J. F.
    Srikesavan, C.
    Horton, R.
    Toye, F.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2022, 3 (04): : 321 - 331
  • [9] Exploring the clinical context of adopting an instrumented insole: a qualitative study of clinicians' preferences in England
    Lin, Denise
    Papi, Enrica
    McGregor, Alison H.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [10] A qualitative study of clinicians' impressions regarding the implementation of a clinical and research data collection system
    Riopel, Gabrielle
    Lecomte, Tania
    Merlo, Raphaelle
    Gauthier, Bruno
    Grenier, Simon
    Vanasse, Catherine-Marie
    COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (01):