Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Haoyue [1 ]
Li, Qiufang [1 ]
Xu, Rui [2 ]
Han, Shuangrong [1 ]
Yang, Jiayin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ ZZU, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool to explore nurses' competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management, and to help nurses understand their current shortcomings in cancer pain management. The scale, currently available only in English and translated into Chinese for wider adoption abroad, provides a tool for Chinese nurses to assess their level of cancer pain management. Furthermore, based on the scale's specific score, they can evaluate their lack of understanding about cancer pain management, advance research into this area, and enhance their capacity to control cancer pain while providing patient care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to translate and localize the new scale, and to measure its reliability and validity. The study was also to provide a way to quickly and accurately measure the competency of cancer pain management among nursing staff in China. Methods: The Bristling translation approach was used to translate, translate back, and culturally modify the English version of the cancer pain management competency scale for nurses to create the Chinese version. A convenience sample was used for the study, 220 clinical nurses from three Grade III hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, were chosen by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the scale was used for this investigation. Results: The Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale for Nurses has 14 items over 4 dimensions in its Chinese form. From the exploratory factor analysis, four common components were recovered; the cumulative variance rate was 81.994%, the scale's Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.902, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.938. Retest reliability was 0.915, scale content validity was 0.865, and Spearman-Brown's broken half reliability was 0.808. Conclusion: Nurses' cancer pain management competency in clinics can be assessed using the Chinese version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale, which has strong validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:e375 / e380
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses
    Ahmet Yıldız
    BMC Health Services Research, 24 (1)
  • [32] Validity and reliability study for the Turkish version of global pain scale
    Aktas, Hasan
    Uyar, Meltem
    Korhan, Esra Akin
    Yildrim, Yasemin Kuzeyli
    Eyigor, Can
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 69 (09) : 1246 - 1252
  • [33] Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Scale
    Lv, Rui-juan
    Wu, Li-wen
    Jin, Li-ri
    Lu, Qiang
    Wang, Meng-yang
    Liu, Hui
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 16 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [34] Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the State Feelings of Fat Scale
    Yuan, Weizhuo
    Jiang, Yuan
    Zhou, Xuan
    Lin, Qiuying
    Chen, Chunchun
    Lu, Yuxi
    Pu, Yinji
    Gui, Junxiao
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2022, 50 (11):
  • [35] The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Modified Overt Aggression Scale
    Huang, Hui Chun
    Wang, Yu-Ting
    Chen, Kao Ching
    Yeh, Tzung Lieh
    Lee, I. Hui
    Chen, Po See
    Yang, Yen Kuang
    Lu, Ru Band
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 13 (04) : 303 - 306
  • [36] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of McAllister's trust scale
    Ding, Zhikun
    Ng, Fungfai
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 25 (11) : 1107 - 1117
  • [37] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of diabetes distress screening scale
    Li, M.
    Mo, Y.
    Ji, L.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 : S401 - S402
  • [38] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents
    Xinyue Zhou
    Qian Xu
    Cándido J. Inglés
    María D. Hidalgo
    Annette M. La Greca
    Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2008, 39 : 185 - 200
  • [39] Validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Tian, Hongjun
    Chen, Xinying
    Jia, Feng
    Li, Ranli
    Sun, Yun
    Chen, Langlang
    Zhu, Jingjing
    Jiang, Deguo
    Zhuo, Chuanjun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [40] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    TAN Song
    NIU Hui-xia
    ZHAO Lu
    GAO Yuan
    LU Jia-meng
    SHI Chang-he
    Chandra Avinash
    WANG Rui-hao
    XU Yu-ming
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048