Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Haoyue [1 ]
Li, Qiufang [1 ]
Xu, Rui [2 ]
Han, Shuangrong [1 ]
Yang, Jiayin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ ZZU, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool to explore nurses' competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management, and to help nurses understand their current shortcomings in cancer pain management. The scale, currently available only in English and translated into Chinese for wider adoption abroad, provides a tool for Chinese nurses to assess their level of cancer pain management. Furthermore, based on the scale's specific score, they can evaluate their lack of understanding about cancer pain management, advance research into this area, and enhance their capacity to control cancer pain while providing patient care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to translate and localize the new scale, and to measure its reliability and validity. The study was also to provide a way to quickly and accurately measure the competency of cancer pain management among nursing staff in China. Methods: The Bristling translation approach was used to translate, translate back, and culturally modify the English version of the cancer pain management competency scale for nurses to create the Chinese version. A convenience sample was used for the study, 220 clinical nurses from three Grade III hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, were chosen by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the scale was used for this investigation. Results: The Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale for Nurses has 14 items over 4 dimensions in its Chinese form. From the exploratory factor analysis, four common components were recovered; the cumulative variance rate was 81.994%, the scale's Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.902, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.938. Retest reliability was 0.915, scale content validity was 0.865, and Spearman-Brown's broken half reliability was 0.808. Conclusion: Nurses' cancer pain management competency in clinics can be assessed using the Chinese version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale, which has strong validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:e375 / e380
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire for nurses
    Xie, Wenguang
    Li, Jingrui
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Shu, Yue
    Yang, Xinchen
    Deng, Yulu
    Zhang, Chao
    NURSING OPEN, 2024, 11 (06):
  • [22] The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of nurses' self-concept questionnaire
    Cao, Xiao Yi
    Liu, Xiao Hong
    Tian, Lang
    Guo, Yan Qin
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 21 (04) : 657 - 667
  • [23] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Work-Family-School Role Conflicts Scale among nurses
    Song, Rhayun
    Li, Caifu
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Xianwen
    Zhou, Zanhua
    Xu, Lijuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (02) : 221 - 226
  • [24] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version neuropathic pain symptom inventory in patients with colorectal cancer
    Lu, Ling-Chun
    Chang, Sou-Yi
    Liu, Chieh-Yu
    Tsay, Shiow-Luan
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 117 (11) : 1019 - 1026
  • [25] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Work-Family-School Role Conflicts Scale among nurses
    Rhayun Song
    Caifu Li
    Lei Wang
    Xianwen Li
    Zanhua Zhou
    Lijuan Xu
    International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2021, 8 (02) : 221 - 226
  • [26] The Chinese version of rating scale of pain expression during childbirth (ESVADOPA): reliability and validity assessment
    Wu, Yu
    Chu, Yanxin
    Zhao, Xin
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Chen, Liyuan
    Duan, Ruihan
    Li, Yunfeng
    Liu, Xia
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [27] The Reliability and Validity of the Cantonese Version of the Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (ChPTSS) in a Sample of Chinese Patients with Chronic Pain
    Wong, Wing S.
    Chen, Phoon P.
    Chow, Yu F.
    Wong, Steven
    Fielding, Richard
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (12) : 2316 - 2323
  • [28] Validity and reliability of the Nurses' Professional Values Scale's Turkish version
    Orak, Nuray Sahin
    Alpar, Sule Ecevit
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2012, 2 (05): : 22 - 31
  • [29] Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version of the Nurses Professional Values Scale - Revised
    Acaroglu, Rengin
    FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE JOURNAL OF NURSING-FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE HEMSIRELIK DERGISI, 2014, 22 (01): : 8 - 16
  • [30] The Turkish version of the Nurses' Occupational Stressor Scale: A validity and reliability study
    Sarialioglu, Arzu
    Ozcan, Serpil
    Ciftci, Bahar
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2022, 58 (04) : 2927 - 2934