Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Haoyue [1 ]
Li, Qiufang [1 ]
Xu, Rui [2 ]
Han, Shuangrong [1 ]
Yang, Jiayin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ ZZU, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool to explore nurses' competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management, and to help nurses understand their current shortcomings in cancer pain management. The scale, currently available only in English and translated into Chinese for wider adoption abroad, provides a tool for Chinese nurses to assess their level of cancer pain management. Furthermore, based on the scale's specific score, they can evaluate their lack of understanding about cancer pain management, advance research into this area, and enhance their capacity to control cancer pain while providing patient care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to translate and localize the new scale, and to measure its reliability and validity. The study was also to provide a way to quickly and accurately measure the competency of cancer pain management among nursing staff in China. Methods: The Bristling translation approach was used to translate, translate back, and culturally modify the English version of the cancer pain management competency scale for nurses to create the Chinese version. A convenience sample was used for the study, 220 clinical nurses from three Grade III hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, were chosen by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the scale was used for this investigation. Results: The Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale for Nurses has 14 items over 4 dimensions in its Chinese form. From the exploratory factor analysis, four common components were recovered; the cumulative variance rate was 81.994%, the scale's Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.902, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.938. Retest reliability was 0.915, scale content validity was 0.865, and Spearman-Brown's broken half reliability was 0.808. Conclusion: Nurses' cancer pain management competency in clinics can be assessed using the Chinese version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale, which has strong validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:e375 / e380
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Adapted Chinese Version of Neck Pain and Disability Scale Validity and Reliability
    Chen, Ziqiang
    Zhao, Yingchuan
    Wang, ChuanFeng
    Li, Ming
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (20) : E1322 - E1327
  • [2] A Chinese version of the revised nurses professional values scale: Reliability and validity assessment
    Lin, Yu-Hua
    Wang, Liching Sung
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2010, 30 (06) : 492 - 498
  • [3] Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale
    Hu, Jae Yeon
    Roh, Young Sook
    PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2023, 24 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [4] Development and validation of the pain management competency scale for nurses and a nationwide survey of Chinese nurses
    Yixue Wu
    Xiang Pan
    Lihui Gu
    Yingge Tong
    Siyi Chen
    Ke Ni
    Hangyan Du
    Meng Yang
    Jianyi Wang
    Yi Chen
    Yeling Wei
    Lingling Luo
    Wenqian Cheng
    BMC Nursing, 24 (1)
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Worry Scale
    Shiu, ATY
    Wong, RYM
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2004, 21 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of the Trust in Nurses Scale
    Liu, Jujuan
    Zheng, Zhihui
    Ge, Li
    Huang, Yufeng
    Yang, Qingqing
    Chen, Yubei
    Li, Xiaohong
    Pang, Shuqin
    Li, Xia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (05) : 1366 - 1375
  • [7] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A TURKISH VERSION OF THE TRUST IN NURSES SCALE
    Yucel, Sebnem Cinar
    Ay, Semra
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2013, 41 (10): : 1737 - 1745
  • [8] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses
    He, Taotao
    Chen, Yang
    Song, Caini
    Li, Chaoqun
    Liu, Jia
    Huang, Jing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (04) : 503 - 510
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the resilience competency scale: Japanese short version
    Terada, Takashi
    Kawano, Hitoshi
    Nagamine, Masanori
    Shigemura, Jun
    Nagamine, Mitsue
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2019, 73 (04) : 195 - 195
  • [10] Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale
    Yang, Qian-Qian
    Liu, Hua-Xia
    Yang, Chun-Ling
    Ji, Shu-Yu
    Li, Lei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2014, 1 (01) : 23 - 27