Shear deformation behavior of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel lattice structures

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, Gitaek [1 ]
Jeong, Sang Guk [2 ,3 ]
Kwon, Jihye [2 ]
Ahn, Soung Yeoul [2 ]
SaGong, Man Jae [2 ]
Lee, Kee-Ahn [4 ]
Kim, Hyoung Seop [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Sch Convergence Sci & Technol, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[2] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[3] Tohoku Univ, Adv Inst Mat Res WPI AIMR, Sendai 9808577, Japan
[4] Inha Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Incheon 22212, South Korea
[5] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Grad Inst Ferrous & Eco Mat Technol, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Inst Convergence Res & Educ Adv Technol, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Lattice structure; Shear deformation behavior; Finite element method analysis; LASER MELTING SLM; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; FINITE-ELEMENT; COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR; ENERGY-ABSORPTION; ULTRALIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104425
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
With the development of additive manufacturing, lattice structures have emerged as a disruptive technology across various fields, including aerospace, automotive, and defense. Lattice structures exhibit exceptional properties for lightweight and energy absorption capacities, especially under compressive loads. However, the lack of experimental data on complex loads, such as shear properties of lattice structures, poses challenges to their broader application across different load types. This study aims to analyze the shear deformation behavior of lattice structures and compare them with their compressive properties, enabling the safe design of lattice structures for various load applications. To achieve this, 316 L stainless steel lattice structures were fabricated using additive manufacturing in three different geometries: body-centered cubic (BCC), face-centered cubic (FCC), and octet truss (OCT), all at the same relative density. The lattice geometries were compared for their mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms under the two types of loading using DIC and FEM analyses, compression and shear tests. It was found that the mechanical properties of the lattice structures under compression and shear loads varied depending on the geometry, showing that each lattice geometry has a unique load-bearing capacity that exhibits superior mechanical properties. Furthermore, under shear loading, the struts of the BCC lattice structure showed a bending-dominated deformation mode due to the rotation of the nodes, whereas the struts of the FCC and OCT structures presented a compression and tension-dominated deformation mode. As a result, the BCC lattice specimens showed a higher shear energy absorption capacity than the other specimens and were capable of bearing higher loads. In addition, the FCC specimens showed lower shear energy absorption. The OCT specimens presented a uniform strain distribution under both compression and shear loading and showed compliant performance. The shear deformation behavior of various lattice structures has been evaluated by considering both geometrical and local strain distribution aspects. Implications for optimization guidelines and potential improvements were also discussed. These results can be used for research and development of the shear properties of lattice structures, the safe design of lattice structures, and industrial applications.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED 316L AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL
    Wisbey, Andrew
    Coon, David
    Chatterton, Mark
    Barras, Josh
    Guo, Da
    Yan, Kun
    Callaghan, Mark
    Mirihanage, Wajira
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP2022, VOL 4A, 2022,
  • [22] Heterogeneous slip localization in an additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Bean, C.
    Wang, F.
    Charpagne, M. A.
    Villechaise, P.
    Valle, V.
    Agnew, S. R.
    Gianola, D. S.
    Pollock, T. M.
    Stinville, J. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2022, 159
  • [23] Structural representation of additively manufactured 316L austenitic stainless steel
    Bronkhorst, C. A.
    Mayeur, J. R.
    Livescu, V.
    Pokharel, R.
    Brown, D. W.
    Gray, G. T., III
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY, 2019, 118 : 70 - 86
  • [24] Effects of Heat Treatment on Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel
    Burdova, Karolina
    Jirkova, Hana
    Kucerova, Ludmila
    Zetkova, Ivana
    Mach, Josef
    MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 22 (03): : 261 - 266
  • [25] Mechanical and Corrosion Performance of Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel 316L
    Zharkynbekova, Guldariya
    Yuldasheva, Dilnaz
    Ospanov, Alan
    Talamona, Didier
    Perveen, Asma
    2024 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMIMT 2024, 2024, : 154 - 158
  • [26] Strengthening the additively manufactured 316L stainless steel by adding Al
    Xu, Kang
    Yu, Mingxiong
    Huang, Sen
    Tian, Hongsheng
    Mao, Lizhong
    Liu, Xinjian
    Zheng, Danfeng
    Gao, Hongwei
    Zhao, Dengbiao
    Li, Bochuan
    MATERIALS LETTERS, 2024, 357
  • [27] Anisotropic spall failure of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Lamb, K.
    Koube, K.
    Kacher, J.
    Sloop, T.
    Thadhani, N.
    Babu, S. S.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 66
  • [28] Fatigue strength of additively manufactured 316L austenitic stainless steel
    Kumar, Punit
    Jayaraj, R.
    Suryawanshi, J.
    Satwik, U. R.
    McKinnell, J.
    Ramamurty, U.
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2020, 199 (199) : 225 - 239
  • [29] Predicting ductile tearing of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Neilsen, Michael K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2019, 218 (1-2) : 195 - 207
  • [30] Predicting ductile tearing of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Michael K. Neilsen
    International Journal of Fracture, 2019, 218 : 195 - 207