Shear deformation behavior of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel lattice structures

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, Gitaek [1 ]
Jeong, Sang Guk [2 ,3 ]
Kwon, Jihye [2 ]
Ahn, Soung Yeoul [2 ]
SaGong, Man Jae [2 ]
Lee, Kee-Ahn [4 ]
Kim, Hyoung Seop [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Sch Convergence Sci & Technol, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[2] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[3] Tohoku Univ, Adv Inst Mat Res WPI AIMR, Sendai 9808577, Japan
[4] Inha Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Incheon 22212, South Korea
[5] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Grad Inst Ferrous & Eco Mat Technol, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Inst Convergence Res & Educ Adv Technol, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Lattice structure; Shear deformation behavior; Finite element method analysis; LASER MELTING SLM; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; FINITE-ELEMENT; COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR; ENERGY-ABSORPTION; ULTRALIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104425
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
With the development of additive manufacturing, lattice structures have emerged as a disruptive technology across various fields, including aerospace, automotive, and defense. Lattice structures exhibit exceptional properties for lightweight and energy absorption capacities, especially under compressive loads. However, the lack of experimental data on complex loads, such as shear properties of lattice structures, poses challenges to their broader application across different load types. This study aims to analyze the shear deformation behavior of lattice structures and compare them with their compressive properties, enabling the safe design of lattice structures for various load applications. To achieve this, 316 L stainless steel lattice structures were fabricated using additive manufacturing in three different geometries: body-centered cubic (BCC), face-centered cubic (FCC), and octet truss (OCT), all at the same relative density. The lattice geometries were compared for their mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms under the two types of loading using DIC and FEM analyses, compression and shear tests. It was found that the mechanical properties of the lattice structures under compression and shear loads varied depending on the geometry, showing that each lattice geometry has a unique load-bearing capacity that exhibits superior mechanical properties. Furthermore, under shear loading, the struts of the BCC lattice structure showed a bending-dominated deformation mode due to the rotation of the nodes, whereas the struts of the FCC and OCT structures presented a compression and tension-dominated deformation mode. As a result, the BCC lattice specimens showed a higher shear energy absorption capacity than the other specimens and were capable of bearing higher loads. In addition, the FCC specimens showed lower shear energy absorption. The OCT specimens presented a uniform strain distribution under both compression and shear loading and showed compliant performance. The shear deformation behavior of various lattice structures has been evaluated by considering both geometrical and local strain distribution aspects. Implications for optimization guidelines and potential improvements were also discussed. These results can be used for research and development of the shear properties of lattice structures, the safe design of lattice structures, and industrial applications.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Compressive deformation behavior of functionally graded lattice structures of stainless steel 316L
    Mandal, Ajay
    Li, Feng
    Jia, Xiao
    Pei, Yutao
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2025, 35 : 4599 - 4613
  • [12] Mechanical properties and deformation behavior of additively manufactured lattice structures of stainless steel
    Koehnen, Patrick
    Haase, Christian
    Bueltmann, Jan
    Ziegler, Stephan
    Schleifenbaum, Johannes Henrich
    Bleck, Wolfgang
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2018, 145 : 205 - 217
  • [13] Dynamic compressive behavior of a modified additively manufactured rhombic dodecahedron 316L stainless steel lattice structure
    Cao, Xiaofei
    Xiao, Dengbao
    Li, Ying
    Wen, Weibin
    Zhao, Tian
    Chen, Zihao
    Jiang, Yongbo
    Fang, Daining
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2020, 148
  • [14] Behavior of wire arc additively manufactured 316L austenitic stainless steel single shear bolted connections
    Zuo, Wenkang
    Chen, Man-Tai
    Zhao, Ou
    Su, Andi
    Liu, Si-Wei
    Xu, Fangda
    Huang, Yuner
    Cheng, Bin
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2024, 202
  • [15] Dynamic mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Yu, Hongyu
    Chen, Rong
    Liu, Wenyang
    Li, Simeng
    Chen, Ling
    Hou, Shujuan
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2022, 57 (18) : 8425 - 8441
  • [16] Very High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel
    Voloskov, Boris
    Evlashin, Stanislav
    Dagesyan, Sarkis
    Abaimov, Sergey
    Akhatov, Iskander
    Sergeichev, Ivan
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (15)
  • [17] Dynamic mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Hongyu Yu
    Rong Chen
    Wenyang Liu
    Simeng Li
    Ling Chen
    Shujuan Hou
    Journal of Materials Science, 2022, 57 : 8425 - 8441
  • [18] Multibranches of acoustic emission as identifier for deformation mechanisms in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Chen, Yan
    Gou, Boyuan
    Xu, Xin
    Ding, Xiangdong
    Sun, Jun
    Salje, Ekhard K. H.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2023, 78
  • [19] Reveal the hot deformation behaviour and microstructure evolution in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Liu, Yuehan
    Zhang, Chi
    Wang, Yaping
    Xu, Xin
    Zhu, Hongbin
    Jiang, Jun
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2022, 861
  • [20] Mechanical performance of additively manufactured austenitic 316L stainless steel
    Kim, Kyu-Tae
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 54 (01) : 244 - 254