Shear deformation behavior of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel lattice structures

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, Gitaek [1 ]
Jeong, Sang Guk [2 ,3 ]
Kwon, Jihye [2 ]
Ahn, Soung Yeoul [2 ]
SaGong, Man Jae [2 ]
Lee, Kee-Ahn [4 ]
Kim, Hyoung Seop [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Sch Convergence Sci & Technol, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[2] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[3] Tohoku Univ, Adv Inst Mat Res WPI AIMR, Sendai 9808577, Japan
[4] Inha Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Incheon 22212, South Korea
[5] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol POSTECH, Grad Inst Ferrous & Eco Mat Technol, Pohang 37673, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Inst Convergence Res & Educ Adv Technol, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Lattice structure; Shear deformation behavior; Finite element method analysis; LASER MELTING SLM; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; FINITE-ELEMENT; COMPRESSIVE BEHAVIOR; ENERGY-ABSORPTION; ULTRALIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2024.104425
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
With the development of additive manufacturing, lattice structures have emerged as a disruptive technology across various fields, including aerospace, automotive, and defense. Lattice structures exhibit exceptional properties for lightweight and energy absorption capacities, especially under compressive loads. However, the lack of experimental data on complex loads, such as shear properties of lattice structures, poses challenges to their broader application across different load types. This study aims to analyze the shear deformation behavior of lattice structures and compare them with their compressive properties, enabling the safe design of lattice structures for various load applications. To achieve this, 316 L stainless steel lattice structures were fabricated using additive manufacturing in three different geometries: body-centered cubic (BCC), face-centered cubic (FCC), and octet truss (OCT), all at the same relative density. The lattice geometries were compared for their mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms under the two types of loading using DIC and FEM analyses, compression and shear tests. It was found that the mechanical properties of the lattice structures under compression and shear loads varied depending on the geometry, showing that each lattice geometry has a unique load-bearing capacity that exhibits superior mechanical properties. Furthermore, under shear loading, the struts of the BCC lattice structure showed a bending-dominated deformation mode due to the rotation of the nodes, whereas the struts of the FCC and OCT structures presented a compression and tension-dominated deformation mode. As a result, the BCC lattice specimens showed a higher shear energy absorption capacity than the other specimens and were capable of bearing higher loads. In addition, the FCC specimens showed lower shear energy absorption. The OCT specimens presented a uniform strain distribution under both compression and shear loading and showed compliant performance. The shear deformation behavior of various lattice structures has been evaluated by considering both geometrical and local strain distribution aspects. Implications for optimization guidelines and potential improvements were also discussed. These results can be used for research and development of the shear properties of lattice structures, the safe design of lattice structures, and industrial applications.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deformation and Fracture Behavior of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel
    Byun, Thak Sang
    Gussev, Maxim N.
    Lach, Timothy G.
    JOM, 2024, 76 (01) : 362 - 378
  • [2] Deformation and Fracture Behavior of Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel
    Thak Sang Byun
    Maxim N. Gussev
    Timothy G. Lach
    JOM, 2024, 76 : 362 - 378
  • [3] Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel 316L
    Avanzini, Andrea
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [4] A multiscale investigation of deformation heterogeneity in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Chen, Ling
    Liu, Wenyang
    Song, Lijun
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2021, 820
  • [5] Origin of dislocation structures in an additively manufactured austenitic stainless steel 316L
    Bertsch, K. M.
    de Bellefon, G. Meric
    Kuehl, B.
    Thoma, D. J.
    ACTA MATERIALIA, 2020, 199 (199) : 19 - 33
  • [6] Corrosion behavior of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel in acidic media
    Lodhi, M. J. K.
    Deen, K. M.
    Haider, Waseem
    MATERIALIA, 2018, 2 : 111 - 121
  • [7] The Influence of Metastable Cellular Structure on Deformation Behavior in Laser Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel
    Li, Na
    Li, Zhengyang
    Wei, Yujie
    NANOMATERIALS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [8] Hetero-deformation-induced stress in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Kong, Decheng
    Dong, Chaofang
    Ni, Xiaoqing
    Liang, Zhang
    Man, Cheng
    Li, Xiaogang
    MATERIALS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 8 (10): : 390 - 397
  • [9] Thermomechanical fatigue of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel
    Babinsky, T.
    Sulak, I.
    Kubena, I.
    Man, J.
    Weiser, A.
    Svabenska, E.
    Englert, L.
    Guth, S.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2023, 869
  • [10] Additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: An efficient electrocatalyst
    Lodhi, M. J. K.
    Deen, K. M.
    Haider, Waseem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (45) : 24698 - 24704