Suppression of Optical Frequency Shift Based on Single-Beam Compact SERF Atomic Magnetometer

被引:0
|
作者
Miao, Kexuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Tao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guo, Qingqian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Xiaoyu [3 ]
Zhang, Yin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chang, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Biomed Engn Suzhou, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Suzhou Inst Biomed Engn & Technol, Med Imaging Dept, Suzhou 215163, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Jihua Lab, Foshan 528200, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Jinan Guoke Med Technol Dev Co Ltd, Jinan 250102, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
medical optics; atomic magnetometer; spin-exchange relaxation free; optical frequency shift; fictitious magnetic field; orthogonality;
D O I
10.3788/CJL240503
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Objective With advancements in quantum manipulation and optoelectronic detection technologies, the atomic magnetometer, a novel quantum extremely- weak magnetic sensor, has experienced rapid development. Operating in the spin exchange relaxation free (SERF) state, atomic magnetometers offer numerous advantages, including non- cryogenic operation, compact structure, low maintenance costs, and high sensitivity, making them widely applicable in various fields. However, the phenomenon of optical frequency shift, induced by off- resonant circularly polarized pumping light, critically affects the orthogonality of measurement and output response in SERF atomic magnetometers. This study proposes a method for suppressing optical frequency shift based on the analysis of the non- sensitive axis response using a self-made compact single- beam SERF 87 Rb atomic magnetometer. The curve of optical frequency shift, combined with the curve of light absorption, is precisely plotted and analyzed to determine the central resonant frequency of the SERF atomic magnetometer. The analysis indicates that employing this suppression method significantly reduces coupling crosstalk between the measurement axes of the magnetometer, thereby enhancing the orthogonality and output response of the sensitive axis. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of this suppression method. Further comparison reveals that the performance of the self-made compact SERF atomic magnetometer is enhanced by suppressing optical frequency shift, resulting in a sensitivity of 13 fT/root Hz within a bandwidth of 140 Hz and a dynamic range of approximately +/- 3 nT. Methods The optical frequency shift direction is regarded as the photon spin direction, which is equivalent to the existence of an equivalent virtual magnetic field in the direction of the pumping light (x-axis). Due to this fictitious magnetic field, the sensitive axis (z-axis) of the SERF atomic magnetometer reacts to signals from the non- sensitive axis (y-axis). Applying a weak oscillating magnetic field at 40 Hz to the y-axis and a direct current compensation magnetic field to the x-axis reveals a trend where the response of the y- axis varies with the compensation magnetic field along the x-axis. When the response of the y-axis reaches its minimum value, it indicates completion of compensation for the fictitious magnetic field. Results and Discussions As a result of the suppression method, the response of the 40 Hz signal from the y-axis notably decreases (Fig. 2) after compensating for the magnetic field along the x-axis. The variation curve of the compensation magnetic field applied along the x-axis with the laser frequency (Fig. 3) indicates that the magnetic field along the x-axis mainly consists of the fictitious magnetic field of optical frequency shift due to the constant residual magnetic field. After analyzing and compensating for the residual magnetic field along the x-axis, approximately 0.2 nT, based on the principle of optical frequency shift, the optical frequency shift curve [Fig. 4(a)] is plotted, confirming its existence. Coupled with the light absorption curve [Fig. 4(b)], the resonant frequency of 87 Rb atoms is determined to be 377109.23 GHz. By optical frequency shift suppression, the measured coupling coefficient is about 4.5%, which can be used to evaluate more accurately the orthogonality between the measured axes and the response of the sensitive axis(Fig. 5). With potential coupling crosstalk between the y and z axes accurately eliminated, the response of the z-axis significantly improves after optical frequency shift suppression (Fig. 6). As a result of this operation, the self-made compact fiber- coupled SERF atomic magnetometer achieves high sensitivity of 13 fT/ Hz within a-3 dB bandwidth of 140 Hz, and its dynamic range is approximately +/- 3 nT. Conclusions This study proposes a method for suppressing optical frequency shift based on analyzing the response of the non- sensitive axis using a self-made single- beam compact SERF Rb atomic magnetometer. By utilizing the proposed suppression method, the phenomenon of optical frequency shift and the existence of its equivalent fictitious magnetic field are verified. The central resonant frequency of the SERF atomic magnetometer is determined from the plotted curves of optical frequency shift and light absorption. Moreover, suppressing optical frequency shift significantly enhances the orthogonality between measurement axes, reduces crosstalk,and improves the response of the sensitive axis of the SERF atomic magnetometer, thus demonstrating the efficacy of the suppression method. The study results indicate that after suppressing optical frequency shift, the bandwidth, sensitivity, dynamic range, and other performance indicators of the self-made SERF atomic magnetometer improve. Its sensitivity can maintain a level of 13 fT/ Hz within a bandwidth of 140 Hz, with a dynamic range of approximately +/- 3 nT.
引用
收藏
页码:15074011 / 15074019
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Error analysis and suppression of probe system for SERF atomic spin co-magnetometer
    Xing L.
    Quan W.
    Song T.
    Cai Q.
    Ye W.
    Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49 (09): : 2345 - 2350
  • [42] High-sensitivity operation of single-beam optically pumped magnetometer in a kHz frequency range
    Savukov, I.
    Kim, Y. J.
    Shah, V.
    Boshier, M. G.
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 28 (03)
  • [43] Detection of ultra-low field NMR signal with a commercial QuSpin single-beam atomic magnetometer
    Savukov, Igor
    Kim, Young Jin
    Schultz, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2020, 317
  • [44] Suppression Method of Light Shift in K-Rb Hybrid Optical Pumping SERF Atomic Comagnetometer
    Liu, Feng
    Duan, Lihong
    Fan, Wenfeng
    Pang, Haoying
    Liu, Sixun
    Wu, Jiaqi
    Quan, Wei
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (23) : 26665 - 26672
  • [45] Metasurface enabled on-chip double-beam scheme for SERF atomic magnetometer
    Liang, Zihua
    Zhou, Binquan
    Lu, Jixi
    Liu, Ying
    Hu, Jinsheng
    Zhou, Peng
    Wang, Weiyi
    Liu, Lu
    Hu, Gen
    Ye, Mao
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 525
  • [46] Speedy in-situ magnetic field compensation algorithm for multiple-channel single-beam SERF atomic magnetometers
    Long, Tengyue
    Song, Xinda
    Han, Bangcheng
    Suo, Yuchen
    Jia, Le
    METROLOGIA, 2023, 60 (03)
  • [47] Single-beam optical fiber trap
    Taguchi, K.
    Watanabe, N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NANOSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 61 : 1137 - 1141
  • [48] DC-Bias-Magnetic-Field Dependence of Step Response in an Elliptically Polarized Single-Beam Atomic Magnetometer
    Shoji, Yuya
    Khanuengchat, Saenyot
    Takahashi, Shunya
    Daibo, Masahiro
    2020 8TH INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS (IEECON), 2020,
  • [49] High-sensitivity operation of a single-beam atomic magnetometer for three-axis magnetic field measurement
    Tang, Junjian
    Zhai, Yueyang
    Cao, Li
    Zhang, Yaohua
    Li, Lin
    Zhao, Binbin
    Zhou, Binquan
    Han, Bangcheng
    Liu, Gang
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2021, 29 (10) : 15641 - 15652
  • [50] Ultra-sensitive single-beam atom-optical magnetometer using weak measurement method
    Francis, T. J. Vineeth
    Suna, Rashmi Ranjan
    Madhu, P. K.
    Viswanathan, Nirmal K.
    Rajalakshmi, G.
    AIP ADVANCES, 2019, 9 (06):