Esophageal Cancer Outcomes After Definitive Chemotherapy With Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Abana, Chike O. [1 ]
Damen, Pim J. [2 ]
van Rossum, Peter S. N. [3 ]
Bravo, Pablo Lopez [1 ]
Wei, Xiong [1 ]
Pollard-Larkin, Julianne M. [4 ]
Nitsch, Paige L. [4 ]
Murphy, Mariela Blum [5 ]
Hofstetter, Wayne L. [6 ]
Liao, Zhongxing [1 ]
Lin, Steven H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Radiat Oncol, Unit 97,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Esophageal cancer; IMPT; Pencil beam proton therapy; Passive scatter proton therapy; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY PLUS SURGERY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; BEAM THERAPY; CARCINOMA; CHEMORADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The effectiveness of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for esophageal cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy remains inadequately explored. We investigated long-term outcomes and toxicity experienced by patients who received IMPT as part of definitive esophageal cancer treatment. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified and analyzed 34 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who received IMPT with concurrent chemotherapy as a definitive treatment regimen at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2011 to 2021. The median IMPT dose was 50.4 GyRBE in 28 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy consisted of fluorouracil and/or taxane and/or platinum. Survival outcomes were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: The median age of all patients was 71.5 years. Most patients had stage III (cT3 cM0) adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 41.1%; progression-free survival, 34.6%; local regional recurrence-free survival, 78.1%; and distant metastasis-free survival, 65.0%. Common acute chemoradiation therapy-related toxicities included hematologic toxicity, esophagitis (and late-onset), fatigue, weight loss, and nausea (and late-onset); grade 3 toxicity rates were 26.0% for hematologic, 18.0% for esophagitis and 9.0% for nausea. No patient had grade >= 3 wt loss or radiation pneumonitis, and no patients had pulmonary fibrosis or esophageal fistula. No grade >= 4 events were observed except for hematologic toxicity (lymphopenia) in 2 patients. Conclusion: Long-term survival and toxicity were excellent after IMPT for locally advanced esophageal cancer treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation therapy. When available, IMPT should be offered to such patients to minimize treatment-related cardiopulmonary toxicity without sacrificing outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Gerber, N.
    Ilson, D. H.
    Wu, A. J.
    Janjigian, Y. Y.
    Kelsen, D. P.
    Zheng, J.
    Zhang, Z.
    Bains, M. S.
    Rizk, N.
    Rusch, V. W.
    Goodman, K. A.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2014, 27 (03) : 235 - 241
  • [32] Predictive Factors Associated With Late Pulmonary Toxicity After Definitive Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Induction Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Inokuchi, H.
    Yoshimura, M.
    Hiraoka, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (04): : 899 - 899
  • [33] Utilization of neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy and proton beam therapy for esophageal cancer in the United States
    Haque, Waqar
    Verma, Vivek
    Butler, E. Brian
    Teh, Bin S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (02) : 282 - 294
  • [34] Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Anal Cancer Outcomes and Toxicity
    Mitchell, Melissa P.
    Abboud, Mirna
    Eng, Cathy
    Beddar, A. Sam
    Krishnan, Sunil
    Delclos, Marc E.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    Das, Prajnan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (05): : 461 - 466
  • [35] Intensity modulated proton therapy
    Kooy, H. M.
    Grassberger, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1051):
  • [36] Concurrent Chemotherapy and Proton Beam Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
    Xiaomao, G.
    Liao, Z. X.
    Komaki, R.
    Wen, H.
    Chang, J. Y.
    O'Reilly, M.
    Jeter, M.
    Bucci, K.
    Ajani, J.
    Cox, J. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S289 - S290
  • [37] Proton Beam Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
    Lin, Steven H.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Wei, Caimiao
    Myles, Bevan
    Guo, Xiaomao
    Palmer, Matthew
    Mohan, Radhe
    Swisher, Stephen G.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Cox, James D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (03): : E345 - E351
  • [38] The Impact of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy On Proton Therapy?
    Chen, R.
    Bortfeld, T.
    Kruse, J.
    Zhang, X.
    Chang, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [39] DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY USING INTENSITY MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY (IMRT) FOR UNRESECTABLE ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
    Nishida, Y.
    Nakamura, M.
    Oda, K.
    Tauchi, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 91 - 92
  • [40] Vaginal Cancer Outcomes using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for definitive treatment at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Fisher, C. M.
    Klopp, A. H.
    Jhingran, A.
    Vera, R.
    Levenback, C.
    Eifel, P. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S480 - S481