Intensity modulated proton therapy

被引:48
|
作者
Kooy, H. M. [1 ]
Grassberger, C.
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2015年 / 88卷 / 1051期
关键词
CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; WILL SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE; CARLO DOSE CALCULATION; PROMPT GAMMA-RAYS; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; BEAM THERAPY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20150195
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) implies the electromagnetic spatial control of well-circumscribed "pencil beams" of protons of variable energy and intensity. Proton pencil beams take advantage of the charged-particle Bragg peak-the characteristic peak of dose at the end of range-combined with the modulation of pencil beam variables to create target-local modulations in dose that achieves the dose objectives. IMPT improves on X-ray intensity modulated beams (intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy) with dose modulation along the beam axis as well as lateral, in-field, dose modulation. The clinical practice of IMPT further improves the healthy tissue vs target dose differential in comparison with X-rays and thus allows increased target dose with dose reduction elsewhere. In addition, heavy-charged-particle beams allow for the modulation of biological effects, which is of active interest in combination with dose "painting" within a target. The clinical utilization of IMPT is actively pursued but technical, physical and clinical questions remain. Technical questions pertain to control processes for manipulating pencil beams from the creation of the proton beam to delivery within the patient within the accuracy requirement. Physical questions pertain to the interplay between the proton penetration and variations between planned and actual patient anatomical representation and the intrinsic uncertainty in tissue stopping powers (the measure of energy loss per unit distance). Clinical questions remain concerning the impact and management of the technical and physical questions within the context of the daily treatment delivery, the clinical benefit of IMPT and the biological response differential compared with X-rays against which clinical benefit will be judged. It is expected that IMPT will replace other modes of proton field delivery. Proton radiotherapy, since its first practice 50 years ago, always required the highest level of accuracy and pioneered volumetric treatment planning and imaging at a level of quality now standard in X-ray therapy. IMPT requires not only the highest precision tools but also the highest level of system integration of the services required to deliver high-precision radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy On Proton Therapy?
    Chen, R.
    Bortfeld, T.
    Kruse, J.
    Zhang, X.
    Chang, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [2] A comparison of 3D conformal proton therapy, intensity modulated proton therapy, and intensity modulated photon therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma
    Chung, C. S.
    Trofimov, A.
    Adams, J.
    Kung, J.
    Kirsch, D.
    Yoon, S.
    Doppke, K.
    Bortfeld, T.
    Delaney, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S116 - S116
  • [3] Intensity modulated proton therapy: A clinical example
    Lomax, AJ
    Boehringer, T
    Coray, A
    Egger, E
    Goitein, G
    Grossmann, M
    Juelke, P
    Lin, S
    Pedroni, E
    Rohrer, B
    Roser, W
    Rossi, B
    Siegenthaler, B
    Stadelmann, O
    Stauble, H
    Vetter, C
    Wisser, L
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [4] The Status of Intensity Modulated Proton and Ion Therapy
    Dong, L.
    Zhu, X.
    Unkelbach, J.
    Schulte, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 536 - 536
  • [5] Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Li, Yupeng
    Mohan, Radhe
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) : 1079 - 1091
  • [6] TOOLS FOR DEVELOPING INTENSITY MODULATED PROTON THERAPY
    Choe, M.
    Selchau, A.
    Gonzales, D.
    Giacometti, V
    Schulte, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 62 (01) : 218 - 218
  • [7] Prioritized optimization in intensity modulated proton therapy
    Falkinger, Marita
    Schell, Stefan
    Mueller, Johannes
    Wilkens, Jan J.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2012, 22 (01): : 21 - 28
  • [8] Dose painting with intensity modulated proton therapy and intensity modulated x-ray therapy: A comparison
    Flynn, R.
    Barbee, D.
    Bowen, S.
    McCall, K.
    Bentzen, S.
    Mackie, T.
    Jeraj, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2522 - 2523
  • [9] Proton Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Matched Case-control Study of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy
    Li, X.
    Lee, A.
    Lee, N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 106 (05): : 1138 - 1139
  • [10] Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Taheri-Kadkhoda, Z.
    Nill, S.
    Wilkens, J.
    Oelfke, U.
    Bjoerk-Eriksson, T.
    Huber, P.
    Munter, M. W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 : S52 - S53