The risk tolerance and decision-making processes of Australian women regarding medication trials in pregnancy

被引:1
|
作者
Quattrini, Eva [1 ]
Ireland, Demelza J. [1 ]
Keelan, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biomed Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
clinical trial; fetus; mothers; pregnancy; trust; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13884
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundPregnant women have historically been excluded from participation in medication trials, in part due to the perceived risks of drug exposure to mothers and fetuses. However, little is known about pregnant women's attitudes toward risk and participation in such trials.AimsTo address this knowledge gap and to identify factors that influence trial participation.Materials and methodsAustralian women over the age of 18, currently pregnant or within six months of delivery, were recruited to participate in an online survey (n = 623) and follow-up interviews (n = 11). The survey investigated willingness to participate in five hypothetical drug trial scenarios of varying risk. Demographic and obstetric information, including COVID-19 vaccination status, was also collected. The impact of these factors on trial participation was analysed using ordinal regression. Interviews were subjected to thematic framework analysis using a priori and emergent themes.ResultsNearly half of the respondents (48%) indicated a willingness to participate in at least one of the hypothetical trials. As trial risk increased participation likelihood decreased, especially if the risk was to the fetus, regardless of benefits to the mother. COVID-19 vaccination status and medication hesitancy were predictors of an unwillingness to participate. Three broad themes emerged from the qualitative data: risk-benefit analysis, quality of evidence, and trust.ConclusionsOverall, participants expressed a positive attitude toward research and medication trials during pregnancy, but were concerned about fetal risk. The findings of this study may help enhance trial design and the participation of pregnant women in medication trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Study of Decision-Making Processes
    Ritea, Ana-Maria
    Stoian, Sorina Mihaela
    INNOVATION VISION 2020: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOL I-VI, 2015, : 3213 - 3222
  • [42] Relational Decision-Making Processes
    Song, Daegene
    NEUROQUANTOLOGY, 2017, 15 (03) : 120 - 124
  • [43] SPECIFYING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
    BORDEN, A
    CINAR, U
    LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 604 : 139 - 142
  • [44] PARALLEL PROCESSES IN DECISION-MAKING
    NIKLASSON, R
    KEMISK TIDSKRIFT, 1988, 100 (07): : 5 - 5
  • [45] Complex decision-making processes
    Acoustics Bulletin, 2021, 47 (03): : 62 - 63
  • [46] Consumers' decision-making and risk perceptions regarding foods produced with biotechnology
    Wohl J.B.
    Journal of Consumer Policy, 1998, 21 (4) : 387 - 404
  • [47] ETHICS DECISION-MAKING IN AUSTRALIAN HOSPITALS
    MCNEILL, PM
    WALTERS, JD
    WEBSTER, IW
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1994, 161 (08) : 487 - 488
  • [48] Elderly veterans' decision-making processes regarding life-sustaining treatment
    Rodrigez, K
    Young, A
    Appelt, C
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2004, 44 : 524 - 524
  • [49] EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS' PERCEPTIONS AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES REGARDING PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH PALPITATIONS
    Probst, Marc A.
    Kanzaria, Hemal K.
    Hoffman, Jerome R.
    Mower, William R.
    Moheimani, Roya S.
    Sun, Benjamin C.
    Quigley, Denise D.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (02): : 236 - +
  • [50] Understanding Taiwanese students' decision-making factors regarding Australian international higher education
    Chen, Ching-Huei
    Zimitat, Craig
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 20 (02) : 91 - +