The risk tolerance and decision-making processes of Australian women regarding medication trials in pregnancy

被引:1
|
作者
Quattrini, Eva [1 ]
Ireland, Demelza J. [1 ]
Keelan, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biomed Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
clinical trial; fetus; mothers; pregnancy; trust; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13884
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundPregnant women have historically been excluded from participation in medication trials, in part due to the perceived risks of drug exposure to mothers and fetuses. However, little is known about pregnant women's attitudes toward risk and participation in such trials.AimsTo address this knowledge gap and to identify factors that influence trial participation.Materials and methodsAustralian women over the age of 18, currently pregnant or within six months of delivery, were recruited to participate in an online survey (n = 623) and follow-up interviews (n = 11). The survey investigated willingness to participate in five hypothetical drug trial scenarios of varying risk. Demographic and obstetric information, including COVID-19 vaccination status, was also collected. The impact of these factors on trial participation was analysed using ordinal regression. Interviews were subjected to thematic framework analysis using a priori and emergent themes.ResultsNearly half of the respondents (48%) indicated a willingness to participate in at least one of the hypothetical trials. As trial risk increased participation likelihood decreased, especially if the risk was to the fetus, regardless of benefits to the mother. COVID-19 vaccination status and medication hesitancy were predictors of an unwillingness to participate. Three broad themes emerged from the qualitative data: risk-benefit analysis, quality of evidence, and trust.ConclusionsOverall, participants expressed a positive attitude toward research and medication trials during pregnancy, but were concerned about fetal risk. The findings of this study may help enhance trial design and the participation of pregnant women in medication trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE FUNCTIONS OF NUMERACY FOR RISK COMMUNICATION AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
    Lipkus, Isaac
    Peters, Ellen
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2007, 33 : S8 - S8
  • [32] Acquisition decision-making processes: The central role of risk
    Pablo, AL
    Sitkin, SB
    Jemison, DB
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1996, 22 (05) : 723 - 746
  • [33] Women with bipolar disorder and pregnancy: factors influencing their decision-making
    Dolman, Clare
    Jones, Ian R.
    Howard, Louise M.
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2016, 2 (05): : 294 - +
  • [34] RURAL WOMEN'S INVOLVEMENT IN DECISION-MAKING REGARDING LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT
    Arshad, S.
    Muhammad, S.
    Ashraf, Mahmood A. Randhawa I.
    Ch, Khalid Mehmood
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2010, 47 (02): : 162 - 165
  • [35] The Effect of Relationships on Decision-Making Processes of Women in Harare, Zimbabwe
    Nyika, Aceme
    Wassenaar, Douglas Richard
    Mamotte, Nicole
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (03) : 184 - 200
  • [36] Medication Discrepancies and Shared Decision-Making
    Marcum, Zachary A.
    Kisak, Anne
    Visoiu, Adrian
    Resnick, Neil
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2016, 64 (03) : 653 - 654
  • [37] Factors influencing decision-making regarding contraception and pregnancy among nursing students
    Arhin, Afua Ottie
    Cormier, Eileen
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2008, 28 (02) : 210 - 217
  • [38] RISK DECISION-MAKING
    CARR, CJ
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) : 121 - 122
  • [39] Decision-making in Medication Overuse Headache under ambiguity and under risk
    Bottiroli, Sara
    Sances, Grazia
    Cavallini, Elena
    Rosi, Alessia
    Russo, Riccardo
    Michele, Viana
    Bitetto, Vito
    Allena, Marta
    Sandrini, Giorgio
    Tassorelli, Cristina
    CEPHALALGIA, 2017, 37 : 162 - 163
  • [40] DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES OF YOUTH
    MOORE, JW
    JENSEN, B
    HAUCK, WE
    ADOLESCENCE, 1990, 25 (99) : 583 - 592