Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease

被引:1
|
作者
Lansdall, Claire J. [1 ]
Teng, Edmond [2 ]
Chague, Jerome [3 ]
Palanganda, Rohan [4 ]
Delmar, Paul [3 ]
Smith, Janice [5 ]
Cummings, Jeffrey L. [6 ]
McDougall, Fiona [7 ]
机构
[1] F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Prod Dev, Patient Ctr Outcomes Res, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Genentech Inc, Early Clin Dev, South San Francisco, CA USA
[3] F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Prod Dev, Data Sci, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Roche Prod Ltd, Prod Dev, Data Sci, Welwyn Garden City, England
[5] Roche Prod Ltd, Prod Dev, Neurosci, Welwyn Garden City, England
[6] Univ Nevada, Chambers Grundy Ctr Transformat Neurosci, Las Vegas, NV USA
[7] Genentech Inc, Prod Dev, Patient Ctr Outcomes Res, South San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
activities of daily living; Alzheimer's disease; anchor-based; Caregiver Global Impression of Change - Alzheimer's Disease; Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes; clinical meaningfulness; cognition; function; meaningful change; mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease; mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease; Tauriel; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; EDUCATION; ASSOCIATION; CORTEX; MEMORY; BRAIN; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/alz.14050
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Consensus definitions of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) are needed. Existing estimates use clinician-rated anchors in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) populations. Incorporating the care partner perspective offers important insights, and evaluating biomarker-confirmed cohorts aligns estimates with ongoing trials. METHODS: Anchor-based analyses were conducted to evaluate MWPC on the CDR-SB in early AD (Tauriel; NCT03289143) using Caregiver Global Impression of Change in memory or daily activities. RESULTS: Across time points and anchors, mean CDR-SB changes associated with the "somewhat worse" category ranged from 1.50 to 2.12 in early AD, 1.07 to 2.06 in mild cognitive impairment-AD, and 1.79 to 2.25 in mild AD. DISCUSSION: The proposed ranges are appropriate to define meaningful progression on the CDR-SB in similar cohorts and support the interpretation of treatment benefit through MWPC analyses. Thresholds should be calibrated to the context of use; lower/higher thresholds may be applicable in studies of earlier/later disease over shorter/longer durations. Highlights center dot Within-patient CDR-SB change thresholds are provided using caregiver-rated anchors. center dot 1.5 to 2.5 points may be an appropriate range in early AD trials of similar durations. center dot Cumulative distribution function plots illustrate the benefit of a given treatment. center dot When selecting thresholds, the target population and study design should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:5889 / 5900
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条