First Results of Pediatric Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair with the Senhance® Surgical System: A Matched Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Eurlings, Roxanne [1 ,2 ]
Killaars, Rianne E. M. [1 ,2 ]
Cakir, Hamit [1 ,3 ]
Dirix, Marc [1 ,3 ]
Theeuws, Olivier [1 ,3 ]
Staib, Ludger [4 ]
Stephan, Dietmar [5 ]
Visschers, Ruben G. J. [1 ,3 ]
van Gemert, Wim G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, MosaKids Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Med Ctr, P Debyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci FHML, NUTRIM Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab, Univ Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] MUMC, Ctr Hosp Chretien Liege, European Consortium Pediat Surg, Uniklin Aachen, P Debyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Klinikum Esslingen, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Hirschlandstr 97, D-73730 Esslingen, Germany
[5] Marienkrankenhaus Siegen, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Kampenstr 51, D-57072 Siegen, Germany
关键词
pediatric inguinal hernia; laparoscopic hernia repair; robot-assisted hernia repair; Senhance (R) Surgical System; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171703
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most common procedures in pediatric surgery. In children, the application of robotic surgery is limited, meaning safety and efficacy is still to be assessed. This report is the first one worldwide that describes inguinal hernia repair in children using the Senhance (R) Surgical System (SSS (R)). The aim of this matched cohort study is to assess safety and feasibility of robot-assisted IHR (RIHR) in children, compared to conventional laparoscopic IHR (LIHR). Patients and methods: This pilot study included 26 consecutive patients between 3 months and 8 years old who underwent RIHR (31 IH's) with the SSS (R) between 2020 and 2024. These cases were matched based on gender, age, and unilateral or bilateral IH, with 26 patients (32 IH's) who underwent conventional LIHR. Results: There was a significant difference in total anesthesia time, which is most likely due to the extra time needed to dock the robot in the RIHR cases. No significant difference was seen in surgical time. One recurrence (3.2%) was diagnosed in both groups. One patient in the LIHR group was readmitted on the day of discharge due to a hemorrhage. No intervention was necessary, and the patient was discharged 1 day later. Discussion: In this pilot study, the use of the robotic system was safe and feasible. More experience, further improvement of the system for use in very small children, and investigation in a larger sample size with long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contemporary Matched-Cohort Comparison of Surgical Approach to Inguinal Hernia Repair: Are Minimally Invasive Approaches Associated with Higher Rates of Recurrence?
    Tonelli, Celsa M.
    Lorenzo, Isabela
    Bunn, Corinne
    Kulshrestha, Sujay
    Abdelsattar, Zaid M.
    Cohn, Tyler
    Luchette, Frederick A.
    Baker, Marshall S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [42] Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation
    Lukas Gantner
    Hubert Mignot
    Julius Pochhammer
    Felix Grieder
    Stefan Breitenstein
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 (12) : 7647 - 7655
  • [43] Robotic hernia surgery Part I: Robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP). Video report and results of a series of 302 hernia operations
    Baur, Johannes
    Ramser, Michaela
    Keller, Nicola
    Muysoms, Filip
    Doerfer, Joerg
    Wiegering, Armin
    Eisner, Lukas
    Dietz, Ulrich A.
    CHIRURG, 2021, 92 (09): : 809 - 821
  • [44] ROBOTIC-ASSISTED INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR WITH A NEW ROBOTIC SYSTEM: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
    Gantner, L.
    Mignot, H.
    Pochhammer, J.
    Grieder, F.
    Breitenstein, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [45] Robotic hernia surgery Part I: Robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP). Video report and results of a series of 302 hernia operations
    Ramser, Michaela
    Baur, Johannes
    Keller, Nicola
    Kukleta, Jan F.
    Doerfer, Joerg
    Wiegering, Armin
    Eisner, Lukas
    Dietz, Ulrich A.
    CHIRURG, 2021, 92 (SUPPL 1): : 1 - 13
  • [46] STUDY OF PROLENE HERNIA MESH SYSTEM IN MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
    Nandagawali, Vishal
    Bellurkar, Amit
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (36): : 6232 - 6240
  • [47] Robotic hernia surgery Part I: Robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP). Video report and results of a series of 302 hernia operations
    Ramser, Michaela
    Baur, Johannes
    Keller, Nicola
    Kukleta, Jan F.
    Dorfer, Jorg
    Wiegering, Armin
    Eisner, Lukas
    Dietz, Ulrich A.
    CHIRURG, 2021, 92 (08): : 707 - 720
  • [48] Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Children Using the Senhance® Surgical System: An Observational Study
    Killaars, Rianne E. M.
    Visschers, Ruben G. J.
    Dirix, Marc
    Theeuws, Olivier P. F.
    Eurlings, Roxanne
    Dinjens, Dianne J. H.
    Cakir, Hamit
    van Gemert, Wim G.
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (08):
  • [49] EARLY EXPERIENCE OF ROBOTIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR WITH THE NEW HUGO RAS SYSTEM IN EUROPE
    Ferri, V
    Vicente, E.
    Quijano, Y.
    Hernandez, S. F.
    Duran, H.
    Diaz, E.
    Fabra, I
    Malave, L.
    Ruiz, P.
    Balelli, L.
    Broglio, A.
    Caruso, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [50] Trends and outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair in the veterans affairs system
    T. J. Holleran
    M. A. Napolitano
    A. D. Sparks
    J. E. Duncan
    M. Garrett
    F. J. Brody
    Hernia, 2022, 26 : 889 - 899