First Results of Pediatric Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair with the Senhance® Surgical System: A Matched Cohort Study

被引:0
|
作者
Eurlings, Roxanne [1 ,2 ]
Killaars, Rianne E. M. [1 ,2 ]
Cakir, Hamit [1 ,3 ]
Dirix, Marc [1 ,3 ]
Theeuws, Olivier [1 ,3 ]
Staib, Ludger [4 ]
Stephan, Dietmar [5 ]
Visschers, Ruben G. J. [1 ,3 ]
van Gemert, Wim G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, MosaKids Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Med Ctr, P Debyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci FHML, NUTRIM Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab, Univ Singel 40, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] MUMC, Ctr Hosp Chretien Liege, European Consortium Pediat Surg, Uniklin Aachen, P Debyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Klinikum Esslingen, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Hirschlandstr 97, D-73730 Esslingen, Germany
[5] Marienkrankenhaus Siegen, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Kampenstr 51, D-57072 Siegen, Germany
关键词
pediatric inguinal hernia; laparoscopic hernia repair; robot-assisted hernia repair; Senhance (R) Surgical System; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12171703
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most common procedures in pediatric surgery. In children, the application of robotic surgery is limited, meaning safety and efficacy is still to be assessed. This report is the first one worldwide that describes inguinal hernia repair in children using the Senhance (R) Surgical System (SSS (R)). The aim of this matched cohort study is to assess safety and feasibility of robot-assisted IHR (RIHR) in children, compared to conventional laparoscopic IHR (LIHR). Patients and methods: This pilot study included 26 consecutive patients between 3 months and 8 years old who underwent RIHR (31 IH's) with the SSS (R) between 2020 and 2024. These cases were matched based on gender, age, and unilateral or bilateral IH, with 26 patients (32 IH's) who underwent conventional LIHR. Results: There was a significant difference in total anesthesia time, which is most likely due to the extra time needed to dock the robot in the RIHR cases. No significant difference was seen in surgical time. One recurrence (3.2%) was diagnosed in both groups. One patient in the LIHR group was readmitted on the day of discharge due to a hemorrhage. No intervention was necessary, and the patient was discharged 1 day later. Discussion: In this pilot study, the use of the robotic system was safe and feasible. More experience, further improvement of the system for use in very small children, and investigation in a larger sample size with long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate efficacy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] First report of robotic retromuscular incisional hernia repair with Hugo Ras™ surgical system
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Ferraro, Luca
    Salaj, Adelona
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2024, : 2075 - 2079
  • [22] Robotic inguinal hernia repair with the new Hugo RAS™ system: first worldwide case series report
    Mintz, Yoav
    Pikarsky, Alon J.
    Brodie, Ronit
    Elazary, Ram
    Helou, Brigitte
    Marom, Gad
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 32 (06) : 300 - 306
  • [23] Laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a controlled randomized study
    Abd-Alrazek, Mohamed
    Alsherbiny, Hatem
    Mahfouz, Mohamad
    Alsamahy, Omar
    Shalaby, Rafik
    Shams, Abdelmoniem
    Elian, Ahmed
    Ashour, Yasser
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (10) : 1539 - 1544
  • [24] Surgical physiology of inguinal hernia repair - a study of 200 cases
    Mohan P Desarda
    BMC Surgery, 3 (1)
  • [25] The impact of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia treatment: A retrospective cohort study
    Zhao, Yong
    Xu, Zipeng
    Wang, Tao
    Zhou, Dingxing
    Tang, Neng
    Zhang, Shuo
    Chen, Chaobo
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (04)
  • [26] Development of an Interactive Anatomical Model for Robotic TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgical Training
    Zhu, Qinyi
    Sigmon, David
    Soriano, Ian S.
    Dumon, Kristoffel
    Johnson, Michelle J.
    2020 8TH IEEE RAS/EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB), 2020, : 897 - 902
  • [27] Surgical outcomes of totally extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: A retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study
    Takeuchi, Yu
    Etoh, Tsuyoshi
    Suzuki, Kosuke
    Ohyama, Tetsuji
    Hiratsuka, Takahiro
    Ishio, Tetsuya
    Kugimiya, Mutsuhiro
    Matsumoto, Toshifumi
    Kai, Seiichiro
    Bandoh, Toshio
    Shibata, Kohei
    Iwaki, Kentaro
    Tahara, Kouichirou
    Shigemitsu, Yuji
    Inomata, Masafumi
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 5 (04): : 502 - 509
  • [28] Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Large Health System's Experience With the First 300 Cases and Review of the Literature
    Tam, Vernissia
    Rogers, Devin E.
    Al-Abbas, Amr
    Borrebach, Jeffrey
    Dunn, Stefanie A.
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 235 : 98 - 104
  • [29] Robotic inguinal hernia repair with the new Hugo RAS (TM) system: first worldwide case series report
    Mintz, Yoav
    Pikarsky, Alon J.
    Brodie, Ronit
    Elazary, Ram
    Helou, Brigitte
    Marom, Gad
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2023,
  • [30] Bassini inguinal hernia repair: Obsolete or still a viable surgical option? A single center cohort study
    Tse, Wayne
    Johns, William
    Maher, James
    Rivers, Jeannie
    Miller, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2021, 36