Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of a Modern Monoblock Titanium Fluted Tapered Revision Stem for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Alqahtani, Yousef [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Somerville, Lyndsay E. [3 ,4 ]
Vasarhelyi, Edward M. [3 ,4 ]
Howard, James L. [3 ,4 ]
Lanting, Brent A. [3 ,4 ]
Naudie, Douglas D. R. [3 ,4 ]
MacDonald, Steven J. [3 ,4 ]
McCalden, Richard W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Hip & Knee Adult Reconstruct, London, ON, Canada
[3] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, London, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; outcomes; titanium fluted tapered stems; monoblock stems; survival; CONSIDERABLE BONE LOSS; POROUS-COATED STEMS; TERM FOLLOW-UP; FEMORAL REVISION; FIXATION; PROSTHESIS; CEMENTLESS; DIFFERENCE; STABILITY; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.035
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Modular titanium fluted tapered (TFT) stems have demonstrated excellent clinical success for femoral revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. This study reports the short-term outcomes of a novel modern monoblock TFT stem used for revision and complex primary THA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Methods: We identified 126 patients who received a single monoblock TFT stem: 26 patients for complex THA (failed fracture fixation) and 100 patients for revision THA. The reasons for revision THA included 40 for previous periprosthetic joint infection, 42 for aseptic loosening, 9 for trunnionosis, and 9 for peri-prosthetic fractures. The Paprosky grading for femoral bone loss at the time of surgery and the measured subsidence of femoral stems at 3-month follow-up were determined. We evaluated the number and indications for reoperations. Results: The mean time from surgery was 3.9 years (range, 2.0 to 6.9). A paired t-test analysis showed significant improvement from preoperative versus postoperative clinical outcome scores (P < .001) for Harris Hip Score (38.76 +/- 15.24 versus 83.42 +/- 15.38), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (45.6 +/- 19.0 versus 69.9 +/- 21.3), Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical component (31.7 +/- 8.1 versus 37.8 +/- 11.3), and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Mental component (48.2 +/- 12.2 versus 51.6 +/- 12.5). The Paprosky grading for femoral bone loss was Grade 1 (3.9%), Grade 2 (35.7%), Grade 3A (47.6%), Grade 3B (11.1%), and Grade 4 (1.6%) cases. There were 18 reoperations (14.7%), with 13 for peri-prosthetic joint infection (7 treated with implant retention and 6 treated with a 2-stage revision), 4 for instability, and 1 for acetabular aseptic loosening. There were no aseptic failures of the stem. Conclusions: This novel modern monoblock TFT stem provided reliable femoral fixation and has increasingly supplanted the use of modular TFT stems for complex primary and revision surgery in our institution. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S208 / S212
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem
    Masahiro Hasegawa
    Shine Tone
    Yohei Naito
    Hiroki Wakabayashi
    Akihiro Sudo
    International Orthopaedics, 2021, 45 : 1727 - 1733
  • [22] Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty
    Maik Hoberg
    Christian Konrads
    Jana Engelien
    Dorothee Oschmann
    Michael Holder
    Matthias Walcher
    Maximilian Rudert
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1709 - 1713
  • [23] Minimum ten-year results in revision total hip arthroplasty using titanium fully porous long stem
    Hasegawa, Masahiro
    Tone, Shine
    Naito, Yohei
    Wakabayashi, Hiroki
    Sudo, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 45 (07) : 1727 - 1733
  • [24] Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty
    Hoberg, Maik
    Konrads, Christian
    Engelien, Jana
    Oschmann, Dorothee
    Holder, Michael
    Walcher, Matthias
    Rudert, Maximilian
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (09) : 1709 - 1713
  • [25] Long-term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Fluted Conical Femoral Stem
    Wallace, David T.
    Ohly, Nicholas E.
    Allen, David J.
    Baines, Joe
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (04): : 1048 - 1053
  • [26] Use of a Modular Tapered Fluted Femoral Component in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Resection of a Previously Infected Total Hip: Minimum 5-year Follow-Up
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Perry, Kevin I.
    Wyles, Cody C.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (03): : 435 - 438
  • [27] Is modularity necessary when using a tapered stem in revision total hip arthroplasty?
    Schwartz, Adam J.
    Spangehl, Mark J.
    Beauchamp, Christopher P.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2014, 25 (02): : 143 - 146
  • [28] Survivorship and Radiological Analysis of a Monoblock, Hydroxyapatite-Coated Titanium Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
    Saunders, Paul R. J.
    Shaw, Debbie A.
    Sidharthan, Sijin K.
    Siney, Paul D.
    Young, Stephen K.
    Board, Tim N.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06): : 1678 - 1685
  • [29] Long-Term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered and Fluted Modular Stem: A Mean Follow-Up of 16 Years
    Park, Chan -Woo
    Lee, Jong-Hyun
    Shin, Sang Soo
    Moon, Young-Wan
    Lim, Seung-Jae
    Park, Youn-Soo
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (12): : 2420 - 2426
  • [30] Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Modular, Fluted, Tapered Stem for Massive Femoral Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Zheng, Kai
    Li, Ning
    Zhang, Weicheng
    Zhu, Yi
    Zhou, Jun
    Xu, Yaozeng
    Geng, Dechun
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (03) : 989 - 1000