Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Oh, Ha Lynn [2 ]
Yoon, Yoo-Seok [3 ]
Han, Ho-Seong [3 ]
Cho, Jai Young [3 ]
Lee, Hae-Won [3 ]
Lee, Boram [3 ]
Kang, MeeYoung [3 ]
Park, Yeshong [3 ]
Kim, Jinju [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Policy Res Inst, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Wonju, Gangwon do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is comparable to open pancreatic resection; however, cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic pancreatic resection are scarce. The authors performed a population-based study investigating the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatic resection versus open pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 9,256 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complication, complication, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission and 1 year were utilized to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost difference between two interventions divided by quality-adjusted life year. Quality-adjusted life year, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature. Results: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 12.4% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 53.4% of distal pancreatectomies. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection was associated with an increase of 0.0022 quality-adjusted life years for index admission and 0.0023 qualityadjusted life years for 1 year compared with open pancreatic resection. The incremental cost was $321 for index admission and-$1,414 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,429 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$614,965 per quality-adjusted life year gained for 1 year. For distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection improved 0.0131 qualityadjusted life years for index admission and 0.0285 quality-adjusted life years for index admission. The incremental cost was-$1,240 for index admission and-$5,875 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of-$94,519 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$206,351 for 1 year. Conclusion: laparoscopic pancreatic resection was a cost-effective alternative to open pancreatic resection for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, except for the higher cost of index admission for pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost comparison analysis of open versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
    Rutz, Daniel R.
    Squires, Malcolm H.
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Sarmiento, Juan M.
    Etra, Joanna W.
    Perez, Sebastian D.
    Knechtle, William
    Cardona, Kenneth
    Russell, Maria C.
    Staley, Charles A., III
    Sweeney, John F.
    Kooby, David A.
    HPB, 2014, 16 (10) : 907 - 914
  • [32] Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis at Rwanda Military Hospital
    Silverstein, Allison
    Costas-Chavarri, Ainhoa
    Gakwaya, Mussa R.
    Lule, Joseph
    Mukhopadhyay, Swagoto
    Meara, John G.
    Shrime, Mark G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 41 (05) : 1225 - 1233
  • [33] Comprehensive comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness and perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy
    Magge, Deepa R.
    Zenati, Mazen S.
    Hamad, Ahmad
    Rieser, Caroline
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    HPB, 2018, 20 (12) : 1172 - 1180
  • [34] The cost-effectiveness of clozapine: a controlled, population-based, mirror-image study
    Hayhurst, KP
    Brown, P
    Lewis, SW
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [35] Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study
    Edgar Lipping
    Sten Saar
    Kristiina Rull
    Airi Tark
    Mari Tiiman
    Liis Jaanimäe
    Urmas Lepner
    Peep Talving
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6025 - 6031
  • [36] Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study
    Lipping, Edgar
    Saar, Sten
    Rull, Kristiina
    Tark, Airi
    Tiiman, Mari
    Jaanimae, Liis
    Lepner, Urmas
    Talving, Peep
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 6025 - 6031
  • [37] Reply: cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer
    Sharp, L.
    Walsh, C.
    Whyte, S.
    Tilson, L.
    O'Ceilleachair, A.
    Usher, C.
    Tappenden, P.
    Chilcott, J.
    Staines, A.
    Barry, M.
    Comber, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (05) : 1211 - 1212
  • [38] Reply: cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer
    L Sharp
    C Walsh
    S Whyte
    L Tilson
    A O'Ceilleachair
    C Usher
    P Tappenden
    J Chilcott
    A Staines
    M Barry
    H Comber
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 1211 - 1212
  • [39] The critical role of population-based epidemiology in cost-effectiveness research
    Joffe, S
    Lieu, TA
    Escobar, GJ
    PEDIATRICS, 2000, 105 (04) : 862 - 863
  • [40] Outcome Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy: Evidence from a Nationwide Population-Based Study
    Wang, Chien-Che
    Tu, Chao-Chiang
    Wang, Pi-Chieh
    Lin, Herng-Ching
    Wei, Po-Li
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):