Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Oh, Ha Lynn [2 ]
Yoon, Yoo-Seok [3 ]
Han, Ho-Seong [3 ]
Cho, Jai Young [3 ]
Lee, Hae-Won [3 ]
Lee, Boram [3 ]
Kang, MeeYoung [3 ]
Park, Yeshong [3 ]
Kim, Jinju [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Policy Res Inst, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Wonju, Gangwon do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is comparable to open pancreatic resection; however, cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic pancreatic resection are scarce. The authors performed a population-based study investigating the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatic resection versus open pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 9,256 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complication, complication, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission and 1 year were utilized to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost difference between two interventions divided by quality-adjusted life year. Quality-adjusted life year, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature. Results: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 12.4% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 53.4% of distal pancreatectomies. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection was associated with an increase of 0.0022 quality-adjusted life years for index admission and 0.0023 qualityadjusted life years for 1 year compared with open pancreatic resection. The incremental cost was $321 for index admission and-$1,414 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,429 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$614,965 per quality-adjusted life year gained for 1 year. For distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection improved 0.0131 qualityadjusted life years for index admission and 0.0285 quality-adjusted life years for index admission. The incremental cost was-$1,240 for index admission and-$5,875 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of-$94,519 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$206,351 for 1 year. Conclusion: laparoscopic pancreatic resection was a cost-effective alternative to open pancreatic resection for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, except for the higher cost of index admission for pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery in colon cancer
    Mar, Javier
    Anton-Ladislao, Ane
    Ibarrondo, Oliver
    Arrospide, Arantzazu
    Lazaro, Santiago
    Gonzalez, Nerea
    Bare, Marisa
    Callejo, Daniel
    Redondo, Maximino
    Quintana, Jose M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (12): : 4912 - 4922
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia
    Dirksen, CD
    Ament, AJHA
    Adang, EMM
    Beets, GL
    Go, PMNYH
    Baeten, CGMI
    Kootstra, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 14 (03) : 472 - 483
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy and urinary diversion
    Zehnder, Pascal
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) : 415 - 419
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer
    J F O'Mahony
    British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 1209 - 1210
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of population-based skin cancer screening
    Hoorens, I.
    Pil, L.
    Vossaert, K.
    Annemans, L.
    Brochez, L.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2016, 26 : E21 - E21
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer
    O'Mahony, J. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (05) : 1209 - 1210
  • [27] Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer - A population-based nationwide noninferiority study
    Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh
    Cao, Yang
    Petersson, Josefin
    Angenete, Eva
    Matthiessen, Peter
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (11) : 1308 - 1317
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in developing nations: a Colombian analysis
    Ruiz-Patino, Alejandro
    Rey, Samuel
    Molina, German
    Carlos Dominguez, Luis
    Rugeles, Saul
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 224 : 33 - 37
  • [29] Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: cost-effectiveness analysis
    Gosselin-Tardif, A.
    Abou-Khalil, M.
    Mata, J.
    Guigui, A.
    Cools-Lartigue, J.
    Ferri, L.
    Lee, L.
    Mueller, C.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (05): : 830 - 839
  • [30] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RESECTION FOR COLON AND RECTAL CANCER.
    Jensen, C.
    Abcarian, H.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E186 - E187