Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreatectomy: A nationwide, population-based study

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Jun Suh [1 ]
Oh, Ha Lynn [2 ]
Yoon, Yoo-Seok [3 ]
Han, Ho-Seong [3 ]
Cho, Jai Young [3 ]
Lee, Hae-Won [3 ]
Lee, Boram [3 ]
Kang, MeeYoung [3 ]
Park, Yeshong [3 ]
Kim, Jinju [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Incheon St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hlth Insurance Policy Res Inst, Natl Hlth Insurance Serv, Wonju, Gangwon do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection is comparable to open pancreatic resection; however, cost-effectiveness analyses of laparoscopic pancreatic resection are scarce. The authors performed a population-based study investigating the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreatic resection versus open pancreatic resection. Methods: Data from 9,256 patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy (66.8%) and distal pancreatectomy (33.2%) from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Events after pancreatectomy were categorized as no complication, complication, and death. Probabilities of each event and average cost during index admission and 1 year were utilized to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost difference between two interventions divided by quality-adjusted life year. Quality-adjusted life year, a function of length and quality of life, was measured with utility values determined by researching literature. Results: Laparoscopic pancreatic resection was performed in 12.4% of pancreaticoduodenectomies and 53.4% of distal pancreatectomies. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection was associated with an increase of 0.0022 quality-adjusted life years for index admission and 0.0023 qualityadjusted life years for 1 year compared with open pancreatic resection. The incremental cost was $321 for index admission and-$1,414 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $147,429 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$614,965 per quality-adjusted life year gained for 1 year. For distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic pancreatic resection improved 0.0131 qualityadjusted life years for index admission and 0.0285 quality-adjusted life years for index admission. The incremental cost was-$1,240 for index admission and-$5,875 for 1 year, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of-$94,519 per quality-adjusted life year gained for index admission and-$206,351 for 1 year. Conclusion: laparoscopic pancreatic resection was a cost-effective alternative to open pancreatic resection for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, except for the higher cost of index admission for pancreaticoduodenectomy. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a cost-effectiveness study
    Hamdan, M.
    Di Fabio, F.
    Abu Salameh, M.
    Johnson, C. D.
    Abu Hilal, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 : 38 - 38
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Hamdan, Mohammed
    Di Fabio, Francesco
    Pearce, Neil W.
    Johnson, Colin D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1670 - 1674
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study
    Mohammad Abu Hilal
    Mohammed Hamdan
    Francesco Di Fabio
    Neil W. Pearce
    Colin D. Johnson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1670 - 1674
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer
    Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan
    Riviere, Deniece
    van Laarhoven, C. J. H.
    Besselink, Marc
    Abu-hilal, Mohammed
    Davidson, Brian R.
    Morris, Steve
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [5] Real-world cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study
    Liao, Chih-Hsien
    Tan, Elise Chia-Hui
    Chen, Chien-Chih
    Yang, Ming-Chin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (04): : 1796 - 1805
  • [6] Real-world cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study
    Chih-Hsien Liao
    Elise Chia-Hui Tan
    Chien-Chih Chen
    Ming-Chin Yang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 1796 - 1805
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness analysis of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a population-based study
    Chao, Yin-Kai
    Wen, Yu-Wen
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (08)
  • [8] A cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
    Vicente, Emilio
    Nunez-Alfonsel, Javier
    Ielpo, Benedetto
    Ferris, Valentina
    Caruso, Riccardo
    Duran, Hipolito
    Diaz, Eduardo
    Malave, Luis
    Fabra, Isabel
    Pinna, Eva
    Isernia, Roberta
    Hidalgo, Alvaro
    Quijano, Yolada
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (02):
  • [9] Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy
    Fajardo, Roosevelt
    Ignacio Valenzuela, Jose
    Catalina Olaya, Sandra
    Quintero, Gustavo
    Carrasquilla, Gabriel
    Eduardo Pinzon, Carlos
    Lopez, Catalina
    Camilo Ramirez, Juan
    BIOMEDICA, 2011, 31 (04): : 514 - 524
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy
    Carrington, Emma V.
    Hall, Nigel J.
    Pacilli, Maurizio
    Drake, David P.
    Curry, Joseph I.
    Kiely, Edward M.
    De Coppi, Paolo
    Pierro, Agostino
    Eaton, Simon
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 178 (01) : 315 - 320