Life Cycle Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Considering Different Vehicle Working Conditions and Battery Degradation Scenarios

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yaning [1 ]
Cao, Ziqiang [2 ]
Zhang, Chunmei [2 ]
Chen, Yisong [2 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Petrochem Univ Vocat Technol, Coll Automobile Engn, Lanzhou 730060, Peoples R China
[2] Changan Univ, Sch Automobile, Xian 710064, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs); life cycle assessment (LCA); vehicle working conditions; battery degradation; COMBUSTION ENGINE VEHICLES; GREENHOUSE-GAS; CONVENTIONAL VEHICLES; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EMISSIONS; COST;
D O I
10.3390/en17174283
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study establishes a life cycle assessment model to quantitively evaluate and predict material resource consumption, fossil energy consumption and environmental emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) by employing the GaBi software. This study distinguishes the environmental impact of different vehicle working conditions, power battery degradation scenarios, and mileage scenarios on the operation and use stages of PHEVs, BEVs, and HEVs. The findings indicate that under urban, highway, and aggressive driving conditions, PHEVs' life cycle material resource and fossil fuel consumption exceed that of BEVs but are less than HEVs. Battery degradation leads to increased material resource consumption, energy use, and environmental emissions for both PHEVs and BEVs. When the power battery degrades to 85%, the material resource and fossil energy consumption during the operation and use phase increases by 51.43%, 72.68% for BEVs and 29.37%, 36.21% for PHEVs compared with no degradation, respectively, indicating that the environmental impact of BEVs are more sensitive than those of PHEVs to the impact of power battery degradation. Among different mileage scenarios, PHEVs demonstrate the lowest sensitivity to increased mileage regarding life cycle material resource consumption, with the smallest increase. Future projections for 2025 and 2035 suggest life cycle GWP of HEV, PHEV and BEV in 2035 is 1.21 x 104, 1.12 x 104 and 1.01 x 104 kg CO2-eq, respectively, which shows reductions of 48.7%, 30.9% and 36.1% compared with those in 2025. The outcomes of this study are intended to bolster data support for the manufacturing and development of PHEV, BEV and HEV under different scenarios and offer insights into the growth and technological progression of the automotive sector.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Life Cycle Cost for a Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle
    Cimerdean, Denisa
    Burnete, Nicolae
    Iclodean, Calin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF AUTOMOTIVE AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING (AMMA 2018), 2019, : 273 - 290
  • [2] Investigation of battery end-of-life conditions for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
    Wood, Eric
    Alexander, Marcus
    Bradley, Thomas H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2011, 196 (11) : 5147 - 5154
  • [3] Research on energy management strategy considering battery life for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle
    Hu, Jianjun
    Hu, Zhihua
    Niu, Xiyuan
    Bai, Qin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 10 (09):
  • [4] Battery Life Extending Charging Strategy for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicles
    Tang, L.
    Rizzoni, G.
    Cordoba-Arenas, A.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (11): : 70 - 76
  • [5] Research on Plug-in Electric Vehicles Dispatch Strategy Considering Battery Life
    Huang, Yinuo
    Wang, Xiao
    Sun, Hao
    Huang, Xing
    [J]. 2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, ROBOTICS AND CYBERNETICS (CRC 2019), 2019, : 28 - 32
  • [6] All plug-in electric vehicles are not the same: Predictors of preference for a plug-in hybrid versus a battery-electric vehicle
    Lane, Bradley W.
    Dumortier, Jerome
    Carley, Sanya
    Siddiki, Saba
    Clark-Sutton, Kyle
    Graham, John D.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 65 : 1 - 13
  • [7] Battery evaluation for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
    Duvall, MS
    [J]. 2005 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2005, : 338 - 343
  • [8] Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment?
    Anders Nordelöf
    Maarten Messagie
    Anne-Marie Tillman
    Maria Ljunggren Söderman
    Joeri Van Mierlo
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 1866 - 1890
  • [9] Erratum to: Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment?
    Anders Nordelöf
    Maarten Messagie
    Anne-Marie Tillman
    Maria Ljunggren Söderman
    Joeri Van Mierlo
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 134 - 135
  • [10] A Novel Battery Charger for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles
    Wang, Liangrong
    Liang, Jianing
    Xu, Guoqing
    Xu, Kun
    Song, Zhibin
    [J]. PROCEEDING OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND AUTOMATION, 2012, : 168 - 173