Mechanized wet direct seeding for increased rice production efficiency and reduced carbon footprint

被引:1
|
作者
Hung, Nguyen Van [1 ]
Thach, Tran Ngoc [2 ]
Hoang, Nguyen Ngoc [2 ]
Binh, Nguyen Cao Quan [2 ]
Tam, Dang Minh [2 ]
Hau, Tran Tan [2 ]
Anh, Duong Thi Tu [2 ]
Khuong, Trinh Quang [2 ]
Chi, Vo Thi Bich [2 ]
Lien, Truong Thi Kieu [2 ]
Gummert, Martin [1 ]
Rakotoson, Tovohery [1 ]
Saito, Kazuki [1 ]
Kumar, Virender [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Rice Res Inst, Los Banos 4031, Philippines
[2] Cuu Long Rice Res Inst, Can Tho City, Vietnam
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Crop establishment; Sustainable production; Low carbon; Climate change; Agrifood; Resilience; DIRECT-SEEDED RICE; CROP ESTABLISHMENT; MANAGEMENT; FERTILIZER; YIELD; DELTA;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-024-10163-8
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Crop establishment is one of the major rice production operations that strongly affects rice production, productivity, and environmental impacts. This research introduced a new technology and provided scientific evidence for the benefits of mechanized wet direct seeding (mDSR) of rice as compared with the other crop establishment practices commonly applied by farmers for wet direct seeded rice in Mekong River Delta in Vietnam, such as seeding in line using drum-seeder (dDSR) and broadcast seeding (bDSR). The experiment was implemented across two consecutive rice cropping seasons that are Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn season in 2020-2021. Treatments included (1-3) mDSR with seeding rates of 30, 50, and 70 kg ha- 1, (4) dDSR with 80 kg ha- 1 seed rate, and (5) bDSR as current farmer practice with seeding rate of 180 kg ha- 1. The fertilizer application was adjusted as per seeding rate with 80:40:30 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with lower seed rate 30 and 50 kg ha- 1 in mDSR; 90:40:30 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with medium seed rate of 70 to 80 kg ha- 1; and 115:55:40 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with high seed rate of 180 kg ha- 1 in bDSR. Mechanized wet direct seeding rice with a lower seed rate of 30 to 70 kg ha- 1 and fertilizer rate by 22-30% reduced variation in seedling density by 40-80% and in yield by 0.1 to 0.3 t ha- 1 and had similar yield to bDSR. In consequence, N productivity was 27 and 32% higher in mDSR as compared to bDSR during the Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn seasons, respectively. The use of lower seed rate and fertilizer in mDSR also led to higher income and lower carbon footprint (GHGe per kg of paddy grains) of rice production than the currently used practices of bDSR. Net income of mDSR was comparable to that of dDSR and higher by 145-220 and 171-248 $US than that of bDSR in Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn, respectively. The carbon footprint of mDSR rice production compared to bDSR was lower by 22-25% and 12-20% during the Winter-Spring and Summer-Autumn seasons, respectively. Given the above benefits of farming efficiency, higher income, and low emission, mDSR would be a technology package that strongly supports sustainable rice cultivation transformation for the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. Mechanized direct seeding decreased the seed rate by 61-83% compared to broadcast seeding.Mechanized direct seeding increased nitrogen productivity by 27-32% compared to broadcast seeding.Mechanized direct seeding decreased rice carbon footprint by 19-24% compared to broadcast seeding.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2244
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Delaying First Fertilization Time Improved Yield and N Utilization Efficiency on Direct Seeding Rice
    Yang Li
    Xiaolong Yang
    Zuolin Zhang
    Yiyue Lin
    Benfu Wang
    Zhisheng Zhang
    Changyan Liu
    Jianping Cheng
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2024, 43 (2) : 423 - 433
  • [32] Delaying First Fertilization Time Improved Yield and N Utilization Efficiency on Direct Seeding Rice
    Li, Yang
    Yang, Xiaolong
    Zhang, Zuolin
    Lin, Yiyue
    Wang, Benfu
    Zhang, Zhisheng
    Liu, Changyan
    Cheng, Jianping
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2024, 43 (02) : 423 - 433
  • [33] No-tillage and direct seeding for super hybrid rice production in rice-oilseed rape cropping system
    Huang, Min
    Zou, Yingbin
    Feng, Yuehua
    Cheng, Zhaowei
    Mo, Yali
    Ibrahim, Md.
    Xia, Bing
    Jiang, Peng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2011, 34 (04) : 278 - 286
  • [34] The effect of rice seeding rate on rice and fish production, and weed abundance in direct-seeded rice-fish culture
    Rothuis, AJ
    Vromant, N
    Xuan, VT
    Richter, CJJ
    Ollevier, F
    AQUACULTURE, 1999, 172 (3-4) : 255 - 274
  • [35] WHEAT PRODUCTION USING DIRECT SEEDING, REDUCED TILLAGE AND CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE IN MIDDLE ANATOLIA
    Marakoglu, T.
    Carman, K.
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2012, 18 (05): : 789 - 793
  • [36] Carbon footprint of rice production under biochar amendment - a case study in a Chinese rice cropping system
    Liu, Qi
    Liu, Benjuan
    Ambus, Per
    Zhang, Yanhui
    Hansen, Veronika
    Lin, Zhibin
    Shen, Dachun
    Liu, Gang
    Bei, Qicheng
    Zhu, Jianguo
    Wang, Xiaojie
    Ma, Jing
    Lin, Xingwu
    Yu, Yongchang
    Zhu, Chunwu
    Xie, Zubin
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01): : 148 - 159
  • [37] Combing public-private partnership and large-scale farming increased net ecosystem carbon budget and reduced carbon footprint of maize production
    Zhang, Wushuai
    Qiao, Yuan
    Lakshmanan, Prakash
    Yuan, Liuzheng
    Liu, Jiayou
    Zhong, Chenghu
    Chen, Xinping
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 184
  • [38] Use of Genomic Tools to Improve Production Efficiency, Health Resilience and Carbon Footprint of Beef Production
    Basarab, John A.
    Li, Changxi
    Stothard, Paul
    Fitzsimmons, Carolyn J.
    Plastow, Graham
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 : 90 - 90
  • [39] Adoption of Direct Seeding, Yield and Fertilizer Use in Rice Production: Empirical Evidence from China
    Zhang, Chao
    Hu, Ruifa
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [40] Effects of different irrigation methods on production of precision hill-direct-seeding super rice
    Zheng T.
    Tang X.
    Luo X.
    Li G.
    Wang Z.
    Shu S.
    Chen W.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26 (08): : 52 - 55