Mechanized wet direct seeding for increased rice production efficiency and reduced carbon footprint

被引:1
|
作者
Hung, Nguyen Van [1 ]
Thach, Tran Ngoc [2 ]
Hoang, Nguyen Ngoc [2 ]
Binh, Nguyen Cao Quan [2 ]
Tam, Dang Minh [2 ]
Hau, Tran Tan [2 ]
Anh, Duong Thi Tu [2 ]
Khuong, Trinh Quang [2 ]
Chi, Vo Thi Bich [2 ]
Lien, Truong Thi Kieu [2 ]
Gummert, Martin [1 ]
Rakotoson, Tovohery [1 ]
Saito, Kazuki [1 ]
Kumar, Virender [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Rice Res Inst, Los Banos 4031, Philippines
[2] Cuu Long Rice Res Inst, Can Tho City, Vietnam
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Crop establishment; Sustainable production; Low carbon; Climate change; Agrifood; Resilience; DIRECT-SEEDED RICE; CROP ESTABLISHMENT; MANAGEMENT; FERTILIZER; YIELD; DELTA;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-024-10163-8
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Crop establishment is one of the major rice production operations that strongly affects rice production, productivity, and environmental impacts. This research introduced a new technology and provided scientific evidence for the benefits of mechanized wet direct seeding (mDSR) of rice as compared with the other crop establishment practices commonly applied by farmers for wet direct seeded rice in Mekong River Delta in Vietnam, such as seeding in line using drum-seeder (dDSR) and broadcast seeding (bDSR). The experiment was implemented across two consecutive rice cropping seasons that are Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn season in 2020-2021. Treatments included (1-3) mDSR with seeding rates of 30, 50, and 70 kg ha- 1, (4) dDSR with 80 kg ha- 1 seed rate, and (5) bDSR as current farmer practice with seeding rate of 180 kg ha- 1. The fertilizer application was adjusted as per seeding rate with 80:40:30 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with lower seed rate 30 and 50 kg ha- 1 in mDSR; 90:40:30 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with medium seed rate of 70 to 80 kg ha- 1; and 115:55:40 kg ha- 1 N: P2O5: K2O with high seed rate of 180 kg ha- 1 in bDSR. Mechanized wet direct seeding rice with a lower seed rate of 30 to 70 kg ha- 1 and fertilizer rate by 22-30% reduced variation in seedling density by 40-80% and in yield by 0.1 to 0.3 t ha- 1 and had similar yield to bDSR. In consequence, N productivity was 27 and 32% higher in mDSR as compared to bDSR during the Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn seasons, respectively. The use of lower seed rate and fertilizer in mDSR also led to higher income and lower carbon footprint (GHGe per kg of paddy grains) of rice production than the currently used practices of bDSR. Net income of mDSR was comparable to that of dDSR and higher by 145-220 and 171-248 $US than that of bDSR in Winter-Spring season and Summer-Autumn, respectively. The carbon footprint of mDSR rice production compared to bDSR was lower by 22-25% and 12-20% during the Winter-Spring and Summer-Autumn seasons, respectively. Given the above benefits of farming efficiency, higher income, and low emission, mDSR would be a technology package that strongly supports sustainable rice cultivation transformation for the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. Mechanized direct seeding decreased the seed rate by 61-83% compared to broadcast seeding.Mechanized direct seeding increased nitrogen productivity by 27-32% compared to broadcast seeding.Mechanized direct seeding decreased rice carbon footprint by 19-24% compared to broadcast seeding.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2244
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Controlled Release Fertilizer for Increasing N Efficiency of Direct Seeding Rice
    FU JIANRONG
    Pedosphere , 2001, (04) : 333 - 339
  • [22] Increased carbon footprint of materials production driven by rise in investments
    Edgar G. Hertwich
    Nature Geoscience, 2021, 14 : 151 - 155
  • [23] Increased carbon footprint of materials production driven by rise in investments
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2021, 14 (03) : 151 - +
  • [24] Nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated tropical rice established by broadcast wet-seeding and transplanting
    Peng, S
    Garcia, FV
    Gines, HC
    Laza, RC
    Samson, MI
    Sanico, AL
    Visperas, RM
    Cassman, KG
    FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1996, 45 (02): : 123 - 134
  • [25] Climate change and rice production in India: role of ecological and carbon footprint
    Kumar, Pushp
    Sahu, Naresh Chandra
    Ansari, Mohd Arshad
    Kumar, Siddharth
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2023, 13 (02) : 260 - 278
  • [26] Comparing rice production systems in China: Economic output and carbon footprint
    Ling Lin
    Shuai Yanju
    Xu Ying
    Zhang Zhisheng
    Wang Bin
    Liangzhi You
    Sun Zichuan
    Zhang Haoran
    Zhan Ming
    Li Chengfang
    Wang Jinping
    Jiang Yang
    Maimaitizunong, Ayitula
    Cao Cougui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 791
  • [27] Small-Scaled Production of Blue Hydrogen with Reduced Carbon Footprint
    Zagashvili, Yuriy
    Kuzmin, Aleksey
    Buslaev, George
    Morenov, Valentin
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [28] Ratoon rice with direct seeding improves soil carbon sequestration in rice fields and increases grain quality
    Zhang, Lang
    Tang, Qiyuan
    Li, Linlin
    Xu, Huaqin
    Zheng, Huabing
    Wang, Jilong
    Hua, Yujie
    Ren, Linjing
    Tang, Jianwu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 317
  • [29] Direct seeding and transplanting for rice production under flood-prone lowland conditions
    Sharma, AR
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1995, 44 (2-3) : 129 - 137
  • [30] Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates on carbon footprint and ecosystem service of carbon sequestration in rice production
    Jiang, Zhenhui
    Zhong, Yiming
    Yang, Jingping
    Wu, Yangxiaoying
    Li, Hui
    Zheng, Lin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 670 : 210 - 217