The Type I plus Forehead in Facial Feminization Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Moghadam, Shahrzad [1 ]
Shariati, Kaavian [1 ]
Huang, Kelly X. [1 ]
Chin, Madeline G. [1 ]
LaGuardia, Jonnby S. [1 ]
Bedar, Meiwand [1 ]
Khetpal, Sumun [1 ]
Cronin, Brendan J. [1 ]
Lee, Justine C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 200 Med Plaza Suite 460, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, UCLA Gender Hlth Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Facial feminization surgery; Feminizing forehead reconstruction; Gender-affirming facial surgery; Facial gender-affirmingsurgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-024-04341-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction involves one of four possibilities with the Ousterhout Type III anterior table frontal sinus osteotomy and setback performed in most patients while the Type I reduction recontouring is reserved for patients without frontal sinuses or thick anterior tables. However, patients with frontal sinuses and either a moderately thick anterior table or a shallow frontal sinus in the sagittal plane represent an intermediate morphology. For such morphologies, we introduce the novel Type I+ fronto-orbital reconstruction technique, consisting of frontal bone recontouring supplemented with anterior table reconstruction and split cranial bone graft. Methods Transgender and gender non-conforming patients who underwent Type I+ or Type III feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction (2019-2023) were included for retrospective review and comparison of techniques. Results In the 123 patients (mean age 32.2 +/- 9.5 years) included, 6.5% underwent Type I+ and 94.5% underwent Type III feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction. Morphologically, Type I+ patients displayed a shallower frontal sinus compared to Type III patients (median anterior to posterior table depth 4.1[interquartile range, IQR, 1.1-5.0] versus 9.8[IQR 7.5-12.0]mm, p<0.001). At the maximum prominence, Type I+ patients also demonstrated thicker anterior tables compared to Type III patients (median 6.6[IQR 5.0-8.8] versus 2.2[IQR 0.4-4.7]mm, p=0.001). Patients receiving Type I+ procedures underwent an anterior table reduction of 2.7 +/- 1.2mm versus 4.2 +/- 1.2mm for Type III procedures in the sagittal plane (p=0.002). Conclusions The current work introduces a novel solution to an intermediate frontal sinus phenotype for gender-affirming facial feminization surgery. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article.
引用
收藏
页码:4778 / 4783
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Arteries of the Central Forehead: Implications for Facial Plastic Surgery
    Koziej, Mateusz
    Polak, Jakub
    Holda, Jakub
    Trybus, Marek
    Holda, Mateusz
    Kluza, Piotr
    Moskala, Artur
    Chrapusta, Anna
    Walocha, Jerzy
    Wozniak, Krzysztof
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2020, 40 (10) : 1043 - 1050
  • [42] Reply: Facial Recognition Neural Networks Confirm Success of Facial Feminization Surgery
    Chen, Kevin
    Lu, Stephen
    Bradley, James P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (02) : 355E - +
  • [43] Quantifying Facial Feminization Surgery's Impact: Focus on Patient Facial Satisfaction
    Alper, David P.
    Almeida, Mariana N.
    Hu, Kevin G.
    De Baun, Heloise M.
    Hosseini, Helia
    Williams, Mica C. G.
    Salib, Andrew
    Shah, Jinesh
    Persing, John A.
    Alperovich, Michael
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (11) : E5366
  • [44] Current Trends in Facial Feminization Surgery: An Assessment of Safety and Style
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Berman, Zoe P.
    Boczar, Daniel
    Siringo, Nicolette
    Rodriguez Colon, Ricardo
    Trilles, Jorge
    Diep, Gustave K.
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (07) : 2366 - 2369
  • [45] Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use after Facial Feminization Surgery
    Chou, David W.
    Block-Wheeler, Nikolas R.
    Kshirsagar, Rijul
    Brandstetter, Kathleyn
    Kleinberger, Andrew
    Shih, Charles
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 38 (03) : 240 - 244
  • [46] A Novel Application of Virtual Surgical Planning to Facial Feminization Surgery
    Mandelbaum, Max
    Lakhiani, Chrisovalantis
    Chao, Jerry W.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (05) : 1347 - 1348
  • [47] Necessity of facial contouring in feminization surgery for Chinese transgender females
    Li, Dong
    Xu, Liang
    Yu, Zheyuan
    Yuan, Jie
    Wei, Min
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [48] Effect of Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS) on Eyelid Anatomic Features
    Luong, Hanna N.
    Liu, Alice S.
    Sharaf, Basel A.
    Bite, Uldis
    Wagner, Lilly H.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024,
  • [49] Approach to Feminization Surgery and Facial Masculinization Surgery: Aesthetic Goals and Principles of Management
    Deschamps-Braly, Jordan C.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (05) : 1352 - 1358
  • [50] Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery
    Tiffiny A. Ainsworth
    Jeffrey H. Spiegel
    Quality of Life Research, 2010, 19 : 1019 - 1024