The Type I plus Forehead in Facial Feminization Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Moghadam, Shahrzad [1 ]
Shariati, Kaavian [1 ]
Huang, Kelly X. [1 ]
Chin, Madeline G. [1 ]
LaGuardia, Jonnby S. [1 ]
Bedar, Meiwand [1 ]
Khetpal, Sumun [1 ]
Cronin, Brendan J. [1 ]
Lee, Justine C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 200 Med Plaza Suite 460, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, UCLA Gender Hlth Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Facial feminization surgery; Feminizing forehead reconstruction; Gender-affirming facial surgery; Facial gender-affirmingsurgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-024-04341-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction involves one of four possibilities with the Ousterhout Type III anterior table frontal sinus osteotomy and setback performed in most patients while the Type I reduction recontouring is reserved for patients without frontal sinuses or thick anterior tables. However, patients with frontal sinuses and either a moderately thick anterior table or a shallow frontal sinus in the sagittal plane represent an intermediate morphology. For such morphologies, we introduce the novel Type I+ fronto-orbital reconstruction technique, consisting of frontal bone recontouring supplemented with anterior table reconstruction and split cranial bone graft. Methods Transgender and gender non-conforming patients who underwent Type I+ or Type III feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction (2019-2023) were included for retrospective review and comparison of techniques. Results In the 123 patients (mean age 32.2 +/- 9.5 years) included, 6.5% underwent Type I+ and 94.5% underwent Type III feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction. Morphologically, Type I+ patients displayed a shallower frontal sinus compared to Type III patients (median anterior to posterior table depth 4.1[interquartile range, IQR, 1.1-5.0] versus 9.8[IQR 7.5-12.0]mm, p<0.001). At the maximum prominence, Type I+ patients also demonstrated thicker anterior tables compared to Type III patients (median 6.6[IQR 5.0-8.8] versus 2.2[IQR 0.4-4.7]mm, p=0.001). Patients receiving Type I+ procedures underwent an anterior table reduction of 2.7 +/- 1.2mm versus 4.2 +/- 1.2mm for Type III procedures in the sagittal plane (p=0.002). Conclusions The current work introduces a novel solution to an intermediate frontal sinus phenotype for gender-affirming facial feminization surgery. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article.
引用
收藏
页码:4778 / 4783
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Facial feminization surgery - middle and inferior thirds
    Boucher, F.
    Gleizal, A.
    Mojallal, A.
    Bachelet, J. -T.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2017, 62 (02): : 122 - 130
  • [22] Outcomes in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Uhlman, Kathryn
    Gormley, Jessica
    Churchill, Isabella
    Huynh, Minh
    Leveille, Cameron F.
    McRae, Mark H.
    McRae, Matthew C.
    Musgrave, Melinda A.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (02) : 236 - 244
  • [23] Technical Pearls and Pitfalls of Facial Feminization Surgery
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Laspro, Matteo
    Trilles, Jorge
    Brydges, Hilliard
    Tran, David
    Rochlin, Danielle H.
    Cassidy, Michael F.
    Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 93 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [24] Secondary Surgery in Facial Feminization Reasons and Recommendations
    Rochlin, Danielle H.
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez
    Onuh, Ogechukwu
    Rojas, Allison
    Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 89 (06) : 652 - 655
  • [25] Facial feminization surgery: current state of the art
    Altman, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (08) : 885 - 894
  • [26] Timing in Facial Feminization Surgery: Where We Are?
    Rosatti, Fernando
    Cordova, Adriana
    Zabbia, Giovanni
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 94 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [27] Perception of femininity and attractiveness in Facial Feminization Surgery
    Ching, Ann Hui
    Hirschman, Allister
    Lu, Xiaona
    Maniskas, Seija
    Forte, Antonio J.
    Alperovich, Michael
    Persing, John A.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [28] Facial Recognition Neural Networks Confirm Success of Facial Feminization Surgery
    Chen, Kevin
    Lu, Stephen M.
    Cheng, Roger
    Fisher, Mark
    Zhang, Ben H.
    Di Maggio, Marcelo
    Bradley, James P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 145 (01) : 203 - 209
  • [29] Facial Recognition Neural Networks Confirm Success of Facial Feminization Surgery
    Zuo, Kevin J.
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (02) : 354E - +
  • [30] Formations of Femininity: Science and Aesthetics in Facial Feminization Surgery
    Plemons, Eric
    MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2017, 36 (07) : 629 - 641