Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ,2 ]
Kaffey, Zaphanlene Y. [2 ]
Farris, David P. [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [2 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [2 ]
Rasmussen, Mathis [4 ]
Rend, Jintao [4 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Netherton, Tucker J. [5 ]
Korreman, Stine [4 ]
Balakrishnan, Guha [6 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [2 ]
Fuentes, David [1 ]
Dohopolski, Michael J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[6] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; DEEP; PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE; NETWORK; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110542
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy (RT) is expanding rapidly. However, there exists a notable lack of clinician trust in AI models, underscoring the need for effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. The purpose of this study was to scope existing literature related to UQ in RT, identify areas of improvement, and determine future directions. Methods: We followed the PRISMA-ScR scoping review reporting guidelines. We utilized the population (human cancer patients), concept (utilization of AI UQ), context (radiotherapy applications) framework to structure our search and screening process. We conducted a systematic search spanning seven databases, supplemented by manual curation, up to January 2024. Our search yielded a total of 8980 articles for initial review. Manuscript screening and data extraction was performed in Covidence. Data extraction categories included general study characteristics, RT characteristics, AI characteristics, and UQ characteristics. Results: We identified 56 articles published from 2015 to 2024. 10 domains of RT applications were represented; most studies evaluated auto-contouring (50 %), followed by image-synthesis (13 %), and multiple applications simultaneously (11 %). 12 disease sites were represented, with head and neck cancer being the most common disease site independent of application space (32 %). Imaging data was used in 91 % of studies, while only 13 % incorporated RT dose information. Most studies focused on failure detection as the main application of UQ (60 %), with Monte Carlo dropout being the most commonly implemented UQ method (32 %) followed by ensembling (16 %). 55 % of studies did not share code or datasets. Conclusion: Our review revealed a lack of diversity in UQ for RT applications beyond auto-contouring. Moreover, we identified a clear need to study additional UQ methods, such as conformal prediction. Our results may incentivize the development of guidelines for reporting and implementation of UQ in RT.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The application of artificial intelligence in health financing: a scoping review
    Maryam Ramezani
    Amirhossein Takian
    Ahad Bakhtiari
    Hamid R. Rabiee
    Ali Akbar Fazaeli
    Saharnaz Sazgarnejad
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 21
  • [42] Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
    Takiddin, Abdulrahman
    Schneider, Jens
    Yang, Yin
    Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa
    Househ, Mowafa
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (11)
  • [43] Nursing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Buchanan, Christine
    Howitt, M. Lyndsay
    Wilson, Rita
    Booth, Richard G.
    Risling, Tracie
    Bamford, Megan
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (04):
  • [44] Clinical use of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: a scoping review
    Brintha Sivajohan
    Mohamed Elgendi
    Carlo Menon
    Catherine Allaire
    Paul Yong
    Mohamed A. Bedaiwy
    npj Digital Medicine, 5
  • [45] Artificial intelligence in outcomes research: a systematic scoping review
    Graili, Pooyeh
    Ieraci, Luciano
    Hosseinkhah, Nazanin
    Argent-Katwala, Mary
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 601 - 623
  • [46] Application of Artificial Intelligence in Oncology Nursing A Scoping Review
    Zhou, Tianji
    Luo, Yuanhui
    Li, Juan
    Zhang, Hanyi
    Meng, Zhenyu
    Xiong, Wenjin
    Zhang, Jingping
    CANCER NURSING, 2023,
  • [47] Artificial Intelligence Cyberattacks in Red Teaming: A Scoping Review
    Al-Azzawi, Mays
    Doan, Dung
    Sipola, Tuomo
    Hautamaki, Jari
    Kokkonen, Tero
    GOOD PRACTICES AND NEW PERSPECTIVES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1, WORLDCIST 2024, 2024, 985 : 129 - 138
  • [48] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in cardiotocography: A scoping review
    Aeberhard, Jasmin L.
    Radan, Anda-Petronela
    Delgado-Gonzalo, Ricard
    Strahm, Karin Maya
    Sigurthorsdottir, Halla Bjorg
    Schneider, Sophie
    Surbek, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 281 : 54 - 62
  • [49] The application of artificial intelligence in health financing: a scoping review
    Ramezani, Maryam
    Takian, Amirhossein
    Bakhtiari, Ahad
    Rabiee, Hamid R.
    Fazaeli, Ali Akbar
    Sazgarnejad, Saharnaz
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [50] Clinical use of artificial intelligence in endometriosis: a scoping review
    Sivajohan, Brintha
    Elgendi, Mohamed
    Menon, Carlo
    Allaire, Catherine
    Yong, Paul
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)