Artificial intelligence uncertainty quantification in radiotherapy applications - A scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Wahid, Kareem A. [1 ,2 ]
Kaffey, Zaphanlene Y. [2 ]
Farris, David P. [3 ]
Humbert-Vidan, Laia [2 ]
Moreno, Amy C. [2 ]
Rasmussen, Mathis [4 ]
Rend, Jintao [4 ]
Naser, Mohamed A. [2 ]
Netherton, Tucker J. [5 ]
Korreman, Stine [4 ]
Balakrishnan, Guha [6 ]
Fuller, Clifton D. [2 ]
Fuentes, David [1 ]
Dohopolski, Michael J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX USA
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[6] Rice Univ, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION; DEEP; PREDICTION; ENSEMBLE; NETWORK; MODELS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110542
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy (RT) is expanding rapidly. However, there exists a notable lack of clinician trust in AI models, underscoring the need for effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods. The purpose of this study was to scope existing literature related to UQ in RT, identify areas of improvement, and determine future directions. Methods: We followed the PRISMA-ScR scoping review reporting guidelines. We utilized the population (human cancer patients), concept (utilization of AI UQ), context (radiotherapy applications) framework to structure our search and screening process. We conducted a systematic search spanning seven databases, supplemented by manual curation, up to January 2024. Our search yielded a total of 8980 articles for initial review. Manuscript screening and data extraction was performed in Covidence. Data extraction categories included general study characteristics, RT characteristics, AI characteristics, and UQ characteristics. Results: We identified 56 articles published from 2015 to 2024. 10 domains of RT applications were represented; most studies evaluated auto-contouring (50 %), followed by image-synthesis (13 %), and multiple applications simultaneously (11 %). 12 disease sites were represented, with head and neck cancer being the most common disease site independent of application space (32 %). Imaging data was used in 91 % of studies, while only 13 % incorporated RT dose information. Most studies focused on failure detection as the main application of UQ (60 %), with Monte Carlo dropout being the most commonly implemented UQ method (32 %) followed by ensembling (16 %). 55 % of studies did not share code or datasets. Conclusion: Our review revealed a lack of diversity in UQ for RT applications beyond auto-contouring. Moreover, we identified a clear need to study additional UQ methods, such as conformal prediction. Our results may incentivize the development of guidelines for reporting and implementation of UQ in RT.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy
    Shan, Guoping
    Yu, Shunfei
    Lai, Zhongjun
    Xuan, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Jie
    Wang, Binbing
    Ge, Yun
    DOSE-RESPONSE, 2024, 22 (02):
  • [22] Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: a technological review
    Ke Sheng
    Frontiers of Medicine, 2020, 14 : 431 - 449
  • [23] Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy: a technological review
    Sheng, Ke
    FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (04) : 431 - 449
  • [24] Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A scoping review
    Kirubarajan, Abirami
    Taher, Ahmed
    Khan, Shawn
    Masood, Sameer
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2020, 1 (06) : 1691 - 1702
  • [25] Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review
    Sethi, Yashendra
    Patel, Neil
    Kaka, Nirja
    Desai, Ami
    Kaiwan, Oroshay
    Sheth, Mili
    Sharma, Rupal
    Huang, Helen
    Chopra, Hitesh
    Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
    Lashin, Maha M. A.
    Hamd, Zuhal Y. Y.
    Bin Emran, Talha
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [26] A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Research in Rhinology
    Osie, Gabriel
    Kaul, Rhea Darbari
    Alvarado, Raquel
    Katsoulotos, Gregory
    Rimmer, Janet
    Kalish, Larry
    Campbell, Raewyn G.
    Sacks, Raymond
    Harvey, Richard J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2023, 37 (04) : 438 - 448
  • [27] Ageism and Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Chu, Charlene H.
    Leslie, Kathleen
    Shi, Jiamin
    Nyrup, Rune
    Bianchi, Andria
    Khan, Shehroz S.
    Rahimi, Samira Abbasgholizadeh
    Lyn, Alexandra
    Grenier, Amanda
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (06):
  • [28] Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review
    Ma, Bingxin
    Yang, Jin
    Wong, Frances Kam Yuet
    Wong, Arkers Kwan Ching
    Ma, Tingting
    Meng, Jianan
    Zhao, Yue
    Wang, Yaogang
    Lu, Qi
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2023, 83
  • [29] Artificial intelligence in pediatric airway - A scoping review
    Nemani, Sugandhi
    Goyal, Shilpa
    Sharma, Ankur
    Kothari, Nikhil
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (03) : 410 - 416
  • [30] Artificial intelligence in obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review
    Horgan, Rebecca
    Nehme, Lea
    Abuhamad, Alfred
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (09) : 1176 - 1219