Study of a plastic scintillating plate-based quality assurance system for pencil beam scanning proton beams

被引:0
|
作者
Seo, Jaehyeon [1 ]
Chung, Kwangzoo [2 ]
Han, Youngyih [2 ,3 ]
Jeong, Seonghoon [4 ]
Jo, Yunhui [5 ]
Oh, Geon [6 ]
Gi, Yongha [6 ]
Sung, Heehun [6 ]
Ahn, Sung Hwan [2 ,9 ]
Yoon, Myonggeun [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Bioconvergence Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Proton Therapy Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Inst Global Hlth Technol IGHT, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Korea Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Fieldcure Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Anamro 145, Seoul, South Korea
[9] 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Pencil beam scanning proton beam; plastic scintillating plate; quality assurance; THERAPY; DOSIMETRY; DETECTOR; PROFILE; IMRT;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1344_22
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a plastic scintillating plate-based beam monitoring system to perform quality assurance (QA) measurements in pencil beam scanning proton beam. Methods: Single spots and scanned fields were measured with the high-resolution dosimetry system, consisting of a plastic scintillation plate coupled to a camera in a dark box at the isocenter. The measurements were taken at 110-190 MeV beam energies with 30 degrees gantry angle intervals at each energy. Spot positions were determined using the plastic scintillating plate-based dosimetry system at the isocenter for 70-230 MeV beam energies with 30 degrees gantry angle intervals. The effect of gantry angle on dose distribution was also assessed by determining the scanning pattern for daily QA and 25 fields treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy. Results: Spot size, field flatness, and field symmetry of plastic scintillating plate-based dosimetry system were consistent with EBT3 at all investigated energies and angles. In all investigated energies and angles, the spot size measured was +/- 10% of the average size of each energy, the spot position measured was within +/- 2 mm, field flatness was within +/- 2%, and field symmetry was within +/- 1%. The mean gamma passing rates with the 3%/3 mm gamma criterion of the scanning pattern and 25 fields were 99.2% and 99.8%, respectively. Conclusions: This system can be effective for QA determinations of spot size, spot position, field flatness, and field symmetry over 360 degrees of gantry rotation in a time- and cost-effective manner, with spatial resolution comparable to that of EBT3 film.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 92
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of a novel two-dimensional ionization chamber array for pencil beam scanning proton therapy beam quality assurance
    Lin, Liyong
    Kang, Minglei
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    Mertens, Thierry
    Baumer, Christian
    Ainsley, Christopher G.
    McDonough, James E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03): : 270 - 276
  • [22] Log File-Based Patient Specific Quality Assurance: 5 Years of Experience in Pencil Beam Scanning Pediatric Proton Therapy
    Ates, O.
    Pirlepesov, F.
    Hua, C.
    Merchant, T. E.
    Zhao, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [23] Feasibility study of utilizing XRV-124 scintillation detector for quality assurance of spot profile in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Rana, Suresh
    Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 66 : 15 - 20
  • [24] Pencil Beam Scanning System Based On A Cyclotron
    Tachikawa, Toshiki
    Nonaka, Hideki
    Kumata, Yukio
    Nishio, Teiji
    Ogino, Takashi
    [J]. APPLICATION OF ACCELERATORS IN RESEARCH AND INDUSTRY: TWENTY-FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2011, 1336 : 410 - 412
  • [25] On the Equivalence of the Quality Correction Factor for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Sorriaux, J.
    Paganetti, H.
    Testa, M.
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Schuemann, J.
    Bertrand, D.
    de Xivry, J. Orban
    Lee, J.
    Palmans, H.
    Vynckier, S.
    Sterpin, E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 333 - 333
  • [26] Technical Note: Validation of halo modeling for proton pencil beam spot scanning using a quality assurance test pattern
    Lin, Liyong
    Huang, Sheng
    Kang, Minglei
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    McDonough, James E.
    Ainsley, Christopher G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (09) : 5138 - 5143
  • [27] Assessment of Monte Carlo Simulations as Alternative Reference for Patient Specific Quality Assurance in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Shin, J.
    Jee, K.
    Clasie, B.
    Depauw, N.
    Madden, T.
    Paganetti, H.
    Kooy, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [28] Investigation of beam delivery time for synchrotron-based proton pencil beam scanning system with novel scanning mode
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Liu, Chunbo
    Furutani, Keith M.
    Shen, Jiajian
    Bues, Martin
    Dougherty, Jingjing M.
    Li, Heng
    Parisi, Alessio
    Shrestha, Deepak K.
    Yaddanpudi, Sridhar
    Beltran, Chris
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (17):
  • [29] A CASE STUDY IN PROTON PENCIL-BEAM SCANNING DELIVERY
    Kooy, Hanne M.
    Clasie, Benjamin M.
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    Madden, Thomas M.
    Bentefour, Hassan
    Depauw, Nicolas
    Adams, Judy A.
    Trofimov, Alexei V.
    Demaret, Denis
    Delaney, Thomas F.
    Flanz, Jacob B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (02): : 624 - 630
  • [30] Development and Validation of Monte Carlo-Based Facility-Specific Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Model for Patient Specific Quality Assurance
    Liu, H.
    Hong, L.
    Li, Z.
    Slopsema, R.
    Pei, X.
    Xu, X.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E168 - E168