Influencing factors and the establishment of a basin ecological compensation mechanism from the perspective of water conservation: A case study of the upper Yangtze River in China

被引:3
|
作者
Guan, Dongjie [1 ]
Chen, Shi [1 ]
Zhang, Yuxiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Peng, Guochuan [2 ,6 ]
Zhou, Lilei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Smart City, 66 Xuefu Rd, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Res Ctr Ecol Secur & Green Dev, Chongqing 400020, Peoples R China
[3] China Geol Survey, Appl Geol Res Ctr, Chengdu 610036, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol E, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Sch Nat Resources, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[6] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Inst Ecol & Environm Resources, Chongqing 400020, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological compensation threshold; Land use conversion; Water conservation; Optimal parameters-based geographical detec; tor; Upper Yangtze River basin; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142332
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the dual impacts of global environmental degradation and human activities, ecosystem service functions have steadily declined. Ecological compensation has emerged as an important direct and efficient motivator for countries to implement ecosystem protection and restoration. At present, few studies have considered ways in which to establish ecological compensation mechanisms or have analyze the related influencing factors. The ecological compensation threshold is in the conceptual analysis stage; thus, quantitative simulation studies are lacking. In this study, the relationship between water conservation and ecological compensation was analyzed. Scenario simulation and the minimum data method were combined to establish an ecological compensation mechanism for the upper Yangtze River (UYR) basin, and the ecological compensation thresholds were quantitatively assessed. Finally, the factors influencing ecological compensation and the interactions among the factors were analyzed using an optimal parameters-based geographical detector. The results showed that (1) the different land use scenarios for the UYR resulted in notable water conservation differences, with greater differences under the fallow-to-forest scenario than under the fallow-to-grass scenario and existing scenario. (2) Furthermore, 27 subbasins were suitable for the implementation of the fallow-to-forest scenario, with an average ecological compensation threshold of 46.48 yuan/m3 and an average new water conservation amount of 22.02 x 108 m3; and 21 subbasins were suitable for the implementation of the fallow-to-grass scenario, with an average ecological compensation threshold of 107.87 yuan/m3 and an average new water conservation amount of 3.72 x 108 m3. (3) The drivers with the highest and lowest impacts on the ecological compensation thresholds were the grain yield and NDVI, respectively, while their impacts on ecological compensation were significantly enhanced by interactions among the influencing factors. In this study, the differences in ecological compensation standards were compared at the basin scale and administrative scale in different regions worldwide. Moreover, the need to establish a basin-scale ecological compensation mechanism as an effective reference for promoting the implementation and development of ecological compensation policies was explored.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecological rehabilitation effect assessment of soil and water conservation model——A case study of the upper reaches of Liangdang River,Changjiang Basin
    潘竟虎
    魏宏庆
    中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2008, (01) : 192 - 195
  • [32] Research on the cumulative effect of multiscale ecological compensation in river basins: A case study of the Minjiang River Basin, China
    He, Yanmei
    Pan, Hongyi
    Wang, Ruosi
    Yao, Caiyi
    Cheng, Jianxiong
    Zhang, Tianyi
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [33] Study on public willingness and incentive mechanism of ecological compensation for inter-basin water transfer in China in the carbon neutral perspective
    Peng, Zhuoyue
    Pu, Hangrong
    Huang, Xi
    Zheng, Rui
    Xu, Lin
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 143
  • [34] Identifying the drivers of water yield ecosystem service: A case study in the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Zhang, Xiu
    Zhang, Guanshi
    Long, Xie
    Zhang, Qi
    Liu, Dongsheng
    Wu, Hongjuan
    Li, Sen
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 132
  • [35] Evaluation of water yield and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Yang, Hongfei
    Nie, Shunan
    Deng, Siqi
    Zhou, Hui
    Zhou, Xin
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (18)
  • [36] Evaluation of water yield and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Hongfei Yang
    Shunan Nie
    Siqi Deng
    Hui Zhou
    Xin Zhou
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2023, 82
  • [37] Comprehensive optimization of ecological network in inland river basin from the perspective of future development: A case study of Shiyang River, China
    AoKang Xu
    XiangYun Meng
    Jing Shi
    Research in Cold and Arid Regions, 2025, 17 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [38] Fish Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration, Yangtze River Basin, China, Urgently Needs 'Scientific' and 'Ecological' Action
    Li, Jianhua
    Chen, Xiaochen
    Zhang, Xinliang
    Huang, Zhenjia
    Xiao, Liang
    Huang, Liangliang
    Kano, Yuichi
    Sato, Tatsuro
    Shimatani, Yukihiro
    Zhang, Chunpeng
    WATER, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 8
  • [39] Study on Quantitative Model of Water Resource Ecological Compensation in Yangtze River Basin Based on Water Footprint-Decoupling Analysis Methodology
    Sun, Fuhua
    Pan, Daoming
    Zhang, Dandan
    Guo, Jiayi
    Guo, Ping
    Zhang, Xiaojie
    Chi, Chen
    Zhang, Shengnan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [40] Analysis of sediment variation and influencing factors in the upper Yangtze River in the past 50 years, China
    Guo, Wenxian
    Jiao, Xuyang
    Huang, Lintong
    Zhou, Haotong
    Zhao, Ruichao
    Wang, Hongxiang
    WATER SUPPLY, 2022, 22 (05) : 5012 - 5027