Influencing factors and the establishment of a basin ecological compensation mechanism from the perspective of water conservation: A case study of the upper Yangtze River in China

被引:3
|
作者
Guan, Dongjie [1 ]
Chen, Shi [1 ]
Zhang, Yuxiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Peng, Guochuan [2 ,6 ]
Zhou, Lilei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Smart City, 66 Xuefu Rd, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Res Ctr Ecol Secur & Green Dev, Chongqing 400020, Peoples R China
[3] China Geol Survey, Appl Geol Res Ctr, Chengdu 610036, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol E, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Sch Nat Resources, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[6] Chongqing Acad Social Sci, Inst Ecol & Environm Resources, Chongqing 400020, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological compensation threshold; Land use conversion; Water conservation; Optimal parameters-based geographical detec; tor; Upper Yangtze River basin; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142332
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the dual impacts of global environmental degradation and human activities, ecosystem service functions have steadily declined. Ecological compensation has emerged as an important direct and efficient motivator for countries to implement ecosystem protection and restoration. At present, few studies have considered ways in which to establish ecological compensation mechanisms or have analyze the related influencing factors. The ecological compensation threshold is in the conceptual analysis stage; thus, quantitative simulation studies are lacking. In this study, the relationship between water conservation and ecological compensation was analyzed. Scenario simulation and the minimum data method were combined to establish an ecological compensation mechanism for the upper Yangtze River (UYR) basin, and the ecological compensation thresholds were quantitatively assessed. Finally, the factors influencing ecological compensation and the interactions among the factors were analyzed using an optimal parameters-based geographical detector. The results showed that (1) the different land use scenarios for the UYR resulted in notable water conservation differences, with greater differences under the fallow-to-forest scenario than under the fallow-to-grass scenario and existing scenario. (2) Furthermore, 27 subbasins were suitable for the implementation of the fallow-to-forest scenario, with an average ecological compensation threshold of 46.48 yuan/m3 and an average new water conservation amount of 22.02 x 108 m3; and 21 subbasins were suitable for the implementation of the fallow-to-grass scenario, with an average ecological compensation threshold of 107.87 yuan/m3 and an average new water conservation amount of 3.72 x 108 m3. (3) The drivers with the highest and lowest impacts on the ecological compensation thresholds were the grain yield and NDVI, respectively, while their impacts on ecological compensation were significantly enhanced by interactions among the influencing factors. In this study, the differences in ecological compensation standards were compared at the basin scale and administrative scale in different regions worldwide. Moreover, the need to establish a basin-scale ecological compensation mechanism as an effective reference for promoting the implementation and development of ecological compensation policies was explored.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors Influencing the Regional Diffusion of Watershed Ecological Compensation Policies: A Case Study of China
    Gao, Jin
    Gao, Qing
    Liu, Qiudan
    Yang, Jianchuang
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 149 (11)
  • [22] The impact of basin horizontal ecological compensation policies on carbon emissions: A case study of the Yangtze river economic Belt
    Jia, Kuiyuan
    Yuan, Ruhua
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (08)
  • [23] Zoning of rural water conservation in China: A case study at Ashihe River Basin
    Liu, Xiaoying
    Zhou, Sha
    Qi, Shi
    Yang, Bo
    Chen, Yuehong
    Huang, Ruan
    Du, Pengfei
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2015, 3 (02) : 130 - 140
  • [24] Assessment of the impact of LUCC on NPP and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River basin, China
    Yang, Hongfei
    Zhong, Xuanning
    Deng, Siqi
    Xu, Hao
    CATENA, 2021, 206
  • [25] Chinese Practices of Ecological Compensation and Payments for Environmental Services in River Basin - Case Study of Water Source, Beijing, China
    Zheng Haixia
    DYNAMICS OF URBAN AGGLOMERATION IN CHINA: PREFERENCES OF ENERGY-SAVING AND ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY SOCIETY, 2009, : 130 - 136
  • [26] Variations in Basin Sediment Yield and Channel Sediment Transport in the Upper Yangtze River and Influencing Factors
    Chen, Yin
    Wang, Yan-Gui
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2019, 24 (07)
  • [27] Ecological Compensation Based on the Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study of the Xin'an River Basin in China
    Chen, Yuanhua
    Wu, Qinglian
    Guo, Liang
    WATER, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [28] Spatial Distribution and Factors Influencing Ecological Efficiency of the Yellow River Basin in China
    Guo, Zhengquan
    Tang, Shuning
    Wang, Daojuan
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [29] Spatiotemporal analysis and influencing factors of ecological vulnerability in the Tuojiang River Basin, China
    Zhang, Rui
    Hu, Chengyu
    Lim, Hweesan
    Zhang, Yuanjun
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 40 (01)
  • [30] The research of river basin ecological compensation based on water emissions trading mechanism
    Lu, Zuliang
    Xing, Lu
    Xu, Ruixiang
    Hou, Chunjuan
    Yang, Yin
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 89 (07) : 1665 - 1681