QUANTIFYING MODEL UNCERTAINTIES AND SENSITIVITIES IN PARALLEL COMPRESSOR MODELS

被引:0
|
作者
Voigt, Jonas [1 ]
Jurke, Keith-Noah [1 ]
Schultz, Julius [2 ]
Roemer, Ulrich [2 ]
Friedrichs, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Flugantriebe & Stromungsmaschinen, Cluster Excellence SE2A Sustainable & Energy Effi, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Dynam & Schwingungen, Cluster Excellence SE2A Sustainable & Energy Effi, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In this work, we consider a parallel compressor model (PCM), which decomposes a compressor encountering non-uniform inflow into a distorted and an undistorted subcompressor, respectively, to determine its overall operating point. The main advantage of PCM modeling is a significantly reduced computational workload. At the same time, modeling errors are introduced, which need to be quantified together with model input uncertainties. Therefore, we introduce a probabilistic setting where unknown parameters are modeled as random variables. We carry out a global sensitivity analysis, which allows to reduce the complexity of the probabilistic model, by setting unimportant input parameters to their nominal values. This analysis attributes portions of the model output variance (the fan efficiency for instance) to particular input parameters or input parameter combinations, through so-called Sobol coefficients. We further include a parameter describing the PCM inflow averaging process into the analysis, which allows to determine the influence of specific modeling choices onto the predicted efficiency. Efficient sampling methods are needed to estimate the sensitivity coefficients with a reasonable computational effort. A key advantage of the global approach is that nonlinear effects are fully taken into account, the necessity of which will be demonstrated by our numerical examples. The model is also compared to CFD reference simulations to quantify structural model errors. This comparison is based on area validation metrics comparing the stochastic distribution functions of the probabilistic PCM model and the reference data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visualization Workflow for Quantifying Parameter Sensitivities and Uncertainties for Hydrologic Models
    Finkenbiner, Catherine
    Semmendinger, Kyla
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 58 (01): : 5 - 18
  • [2] Quantifying Model Uncertainties in Complex Systems
    Yang, Jiarui
    Duan, Jinqiao
    STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS WITH FINANCIAL APPLICATIONS, HONG KONG 2009, 2011, 65 : 221 - 252
  • [3] Quantifying uncertainties in a national forecasting model
    Hugosson, MB
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2005, 39 (06) : 531 - 547
  • [4] Quantifying uncertainties on the solution model of seismic tomography
    Duffet, C
    Sinoquet, D
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2006, 22 (02) : 525 - 538
  • [5] A METHODOLOGY FOR QUANTIFYING DISTORTION IMPACTS USING A MODIFIED PARALLEL COMPRESSOR THEORY
    Pokhrel, Manish
    Gladin, Jonathan
    Garcia, Elena
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [6] Quantifying age and model uncertainties in palaeoclimate data and dynamical climate models with a joint inferential analysis
    Carson, J.
    Crucifix, M.
    Preston, S. P.
    Wilkinson, R. D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2019, 475 (2224):
  • [7] Building energy models: Quantifying uncertainties due to stochastic processes
    Ahuja, Sunil
    Peles, Slaven
    2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 4808 - 4814
  • [8] Composite ground-motion models and logic trees: Methodology, sensitivities, and uncertainties
    Scherbaum, F
    Bommer, JJ
    Bungum, H
    Cotton, F
    Abrahamson, NA
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (05) : 1575 - 1593
  • [9] Quantifying Uncertainties of Contact Classifications in a Human-Robot Collaboration with Parallel Robots
    Mohammad, Aran
    Muscheid, Hendrik
    Schappler, Moritz
    Seel, Thomas
    HUMAN-FRIENDLY ROBOTICS 2023, HFR 2023, 2024, 29 : 137 - 150
  • [10] Quantifying PM2.5-meteorology sensitivities in a global climate model
    Westervelt, D. M.
    Horowitz, L. W.
    Naik, V.
    Tai, A. P. K.
    Fiore, A. M.
    Mauzerall, D. L.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 142 : 43 - 56