QUANTIFYING MODEL UNCERTAINTIES AND SENSITIVITIES IN PARALLEL COMPRESSOR MODELS

被引:0
|
作者
Voigt, Jonas [1 ]
Jurke, Keith-Noah [1 ]
Schultz, Julius [2 ]
Roemer, Ulrich [2 ]
Friedrichs, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Flugantriebe & Stromungsmaschinen, Cluster Excellence SE2A Sustainable & Energy Effi, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Dynam & Schwingungen, Cluster Excellence SE2A Sustainable & Energy Effi, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In this work, we consider a parallel compressor model (PCM), which decomposes a compressor encountering non-uniform inflow into a distorted and an undistorted subcompressor, respectively, to determine its overall operating point. The main advantage of PCM modeling is a significantly reduced computational workload. At the same time, modeling errors are introduced, which need to be quantified together with model input uncertainties. Therefore, we introduce a probabilistic setting where unknown parameters are modeled as random variables. We carry out a global sensitivity analysis, which allows to reduce the complexity of the probabilistic model, by setting unimportant input parameters to their nominal values. This analysis attributes portions of the model output variance (the fan efficiency for instance) to particular input parameters or input parameter combinations, through so-called Sobol coefficients. We further include a parameter describing the PCM inflow averaging process into the analysis, which allows to determine the influence of specific modeling choices onto the predicted efficiency. Efficient sampling methods are needed to estimate the sensitivity coefficients with a reasonable computational effort. A key advantage of the global approach is that nonlinear effects are fully taken into account, the necessity of which will be demonstrated by our numerical examples. The model is also compared to CFD reference simulations to quantify structural model errors. This comparison is based on area validation metrics comparing the stochastic distribution functions of the probabilistic PCM model and the reference data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A random matrix approach for quantifying model-form uncertainties in turbulence modeling
    Xiao, Heng
    Wang, Jian-Xun
    Ghanem, Roger G.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 313 : 941 - 965
  • [42] Quantifying uncertainties in satellite NO2 superobservations for data assimilation and model evaluation
    Rijsdijk, Pieter
    Eskes, Henk
    Dingemans, Arlene
    Boersma, K. Folkert
    Sekiya, Takashi
    Miyazaki, Kazuyuki
    Houweling, Sander
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 18 (02) : 483 - 509
  • [43] Quantifying uncertainties in the solar axion flux and their impact on determining axion model parameters
    Hoof, Sebastian
    Jaeckel, Joerg
    Thormaehlen, Lennert J.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2021, (09):
  • [44] Quantifying inflow and RANS turbulence model form uncertainties for wind engineering flows
    Gorle, Catherine
    Garcia-Sanchez, Clara
    Iaccarino, Gianluca
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2015, 144 : 202 - 212
  • [45] Uncertainties and sensitivities in the quantification of future tropical cyclone risk
    Meiler, Simona
    Ciullo, Alessio
    Kropf, Chahan M.
    Emanuel, Kerry
    Bresch, David N.
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [46] Sensitivities and uncertainties of modeled ground temperatures in mountain environments
    Gubler, S.
    Endrizzi, S.
    Gruber, S.
    Purves, R. S.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (04) : 1319 - 1336
  • [47] Model Checking Constrained Markov Reward Models with Uncertainties
    Bacci, Giovanni
    Hansen, Mikkel
    Larsen, Kim Guldstrand
    QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF SYSTEMS (QEST 2019), 2019, 11785 : 37 - 51
  • [48] Updating models and their uncertainties. II: Model identifiability
    Katafygiotis, LS
    Beck, JL
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1998, 124 (04): : 463 - 467
  • [49] Quantifying Seismic Source Parameter Uncertainties
    Kane, Deborah L.
    Prieto, German A.
    Vernon, Frank L.
    Shearer, Peter M.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2011, 101 (02) : 535 - 543
  • [50] WASH-1400 - QUANTIFYING THE UNCERTAINTIES
    ERDMANN, RC
    LEVERENZ, FL
    LELLOUCHE, GS
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 53 (03) : 374 - 380