The impact of an endometrial receptivity array on personalizing embryo transfer for patients with infertility: a meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Tran, Huy Phuong [1 ]
Tran, Thuy Thi-Thanh [1 ]
Le, Ly Thi [2 ]
Pham, Bao The [3 ]
Vu, Sang Ngoc-Thanh [3 ]
Ly, Loc Thai [1 ]
Hoang, Tuyet Thi-Diem [1 ]
机构
[1] Hung Vuong Hosp, Infertil Dept, 128 Hong Bang St,Ward 12,Dist 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, Int Univ, Sch Biotechnol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Sai Gon Univ, Informat Sci Fac, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
来源
F&S REVIEWS | 2022年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
Endometrial receptivity array; ERA test; IVF outcomes; personalized embryo transfer; window of implantation; RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE; FRESH BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; ERA TEST; FROZEN; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.06.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. Evidence Review: The PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched. We included studies investigating IVF outcomes between patients who underwent standard embryo transfer and personalized embryo transfer (PET) guided by the ERA results. The main outcome measures were the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate (LBR). The random -effects model was applied to pool data. We evaluated cohort and randomized controlled trial studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: Seventeen studies (7,052 patients, 4 randomized controlled trials, and 13 cohort studies) were included in this meta -analysis. Personalized embryo transfer on the basis of ERA was not found to optimize the gestational outcomes, including the implantation rate (risk ratio [RR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.2), clinical pregnancy rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11), and miscarriage rate (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.81-1.54). Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients undergoing PET in the first IVF cycle had a markedly increased LBR (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.49). Conversely, PET among patients with a history of recurrent implantation failure did not enhance the LBR (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36). Conclusion: Endometrial receptivity array shows no significant improvement in IVF outcomes except in the LBR for patients undergoing the first IVF cycle. Additional research is required to ascertain the efficacy of ERA before achieving wider usage. PROSPERO Number: CRD42021255124. (Fertil Steril Rev (R) 2022;3:157-73. (c) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 173
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of endometrial receptivity by Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) in patients with adenomyosis and previous implantation failure
    Kaur, S.
    Mahajan, N.
    Naidu, P.
    Rani, K.
    Kaur, J.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 : 358 - 358
  • [42] Personalized Embryo Transfer Outcomes in Recurrent Implantation Failure Patients Following Endometrial Receptivity Array With Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing
    Amin, Jayesh, Sr.
    Patel, Ripal
    JayeshAmin, Grishma
    Gomedhikam, Jayaprakash
    Surakala, Swarnalatha
    Kota, Muralikrishna
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [43] ROUTINE ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY ARRAY IN FIRST EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES DOES NOT IMPROVE LIVE BIRTH RATE.
    Riestenberg, Carrie
    Kroener, Lindsay
    Ching, Kaycee
    Ambartsumyan, Gayane
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E281 - E281
  • [44] Endometrial preparation for frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Hanglin Wu
    Ping Zhou
    Xiaona Lin
    Shasha Wang
    Songying Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2021, 38 : 1913 - 1926
  • [45] The impact of infertility diagnosis on embryo-endometrial dialogue
    Parks, Jason C.
    McCallie, Blair R.
    Patton, Alyssa L.
    Al-Safi, Zain A.
    Polotsky, Alex J.
    Griffin, Darren K.
    Schoolcraft, William B.
    Katz-Jaffe, Mandy G.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION, 2018, 155 (06) : 543 - 552
  • [46] Efficiency of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer after cured of endometrial abnormality for infertility patients with endometrial hyperplasia
    Kato, K.
    Segawa, T.
    Kawachiya, S.
    Kaijima, H.
    Takehara, Y.
    Teramoto, S.
    Kato, O.
    Inoue, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I125 - I125
  • [47] Meta-analysis of the embryo freezing transfer interval
    Matorras, Roberto
    Ignacio Pijoan, Jose
    Perez-Ruiz, Irantzu
    Lainz, Lucia
    Malaina, Iker
    Borjaba, Sonia
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 20 (02) : 144 - 158
  • [48] The role of transcriptomic biomarkers of endometrial receptivity in personalized embryo transfer for patients with repeated implantation failure
    He, Aihua
    Zou, Yangyun
    Wan, Cheng
    Zhao, Jing
    Zhang, Qiong
    Yao, Zhongyuan
    Tian, Fen
    Wu, Hong
    Huang, Xi
    Fu, Jing
    Hu, Chunxu
    Sun, Yue
    Xiao, Lan
    Yang, Tianli
    Hou, Zhaojuan
    Dong, Xin
    Lu, Sijia
    Li, Yanping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [49] The role of transcriptomic biomarkers of endometrial receptivity in personalized embryo transfer for patients with repeated implantation failure
    Aihua He
    Yangyun Zou
    Cheng Wan
    Jing Zhao
    Qiong Zhang
    Zhongyuan Yao
    Fen Tian
    Hong Wu
    Xi Huang
    Jing Fu
    Chunxu Hu
    Yue Sun
    Lan Xiao
    Tianli Yang
    Zhaojuan Hou
    Xin Dong
    Sijia Lu
    Yanping Li
    [J]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 19
  • [50] The impact of difficult embryo transfer on the success of IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Galati, Giulia
    Reschini, Marco
    Mensi, Laura
    Di Dio, Camilla
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    Muzii, Ludovico
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)