The impact of an endometrial receptivity array on personalizing embryo transfer for patients with infertility: a meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Tran, Huy Phuong [1 ]
Tran, Thuy Thi-Thanh [1 ]
Le, Ly Thi [2 ]
Pham, Bao The [3 ]
Vu, Sang Ngoc-Thanh [3 ]
Ly, Loc Thai [1 ]
Hoang, Tuyet Thi-Diem [1 ]
机构
[1] Hung Vuong Hosp, Infertil Dept, 128 Hong Bang St,Ward 12,Dist 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, Int Univ, Sch Biotechnol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Sai Gon Univ, Informat Sci Fac, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
来源
F&S REVIEWS | 2022年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
Endometrial receptivity array; ERA test; IVF outcomes; personalized embryo transfer; window of implantation; RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE; FRESH BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; ERA TEST; FROZEN; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.06.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. Evidence Review: The PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched. We included studies investigating IVF outcomes between patients who underwent standard embryo transfer and personalized embryo transfer (PET) guided by the ERA results. The main outcome measures were the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate (LBR). The random -effects model was applied to pool data. We evaluated cohort and randomized controlled trial studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: Seventeen studies (7,052 patients, 4 randomized controlled trials, and 13 cohort studies) were included in this meta -analysis. Personalized embryo transfer on the basis of ERA was not found to optimize the gestational outcomes, including the implantation rate (risk ratio [RR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.2), clinical pregnancy rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11), and miscarriage rate (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.81-1.54). Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients undergoing PET in the first IVF cycle had a markedly increased LBR (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.49). Conversely, PET among patients with a history of recurrent implantation failure did not enhance the LBR (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36). Conclusion: Endometrial receptivity array shows no significant improvement in IVF outcomes except in the LBR for patients undergoing the first IVF cycle. Additional research is required to ascertain the efficacy of ERA before achieving wider usage. PROSPERO Number: CRD42021255124. (Fertil Steril Rev (R) 2022;3:157-73. (c) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 173
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATING THE USE OF NATURAL CYCLE ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY ARRAY PRIOR TO EMBRYO TRANSFER.
    Vaughn, S. J.
    Lathi, R. B.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (04) : E45 - E46
  • [22] Association of embryo transfer type with infertility in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chang, Yanan
    Shen, Minghong
    Wang, Sha
    Li, Xiao
    Duan, Hua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (05) : 1033 - 1043
  • [23] Association of embryo transfer type with infertility in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yanan Chang
    Minghong Shen
    Sha Wang
    Xiao Li
    Hua Duan
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 1033 - 1043
  • [24] Personalization of the euploid embryo transfer guided by the endometrial receptivity analysis in patients with >1 previous failed transfer
    Perilla, D. Valbuena
    Gomez, C.
    Stankewicz, T.
    Castellon, J. A.
    Al Asmar, N.
    Simon, C.
    Rubio, C.
    Ruiz, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 : I403 - I403
  • [25] Acupuncture in improving endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yajing Zhong
    Fanzhu Zeng
    Wanjun Liu
    Jing Ma
    Yongge Guan
    Yang Song
    [J]. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 19
  • [26] Personolized embryo transfer (pET) after Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) in patients with recurrent implantation failure -an observational study
    Arikan, G.
    Findikli, N.
    Yagmur, E.
    Karlikaya, G.
    Gultomruk, M.
    Bahceci, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 268 - 268
  • [27] META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE ON ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY
    Liu, Na
    Long, Na
    Han, Lu
    Cai, Xia
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2014, 30 (04): : 885 - 891
  • [28] Acupuncture in improving endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhong, Yajing
    Zeng, Fanzhu
    Liu, Wanjun
    Ma, Jing
    Guan, Yongge
    Song, Yang
    [J]. BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (1):
  • [29] Endometrial receptivity analysis for personalized embryo transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure: a retrospective analysis of a Chinese cohort
    Jia, Y.
    Sha, Y. L.
    Qiu, Z.
    Guo, Y. H.
    Tan, A. X.
    Huang, Y.
    Zhong, Y.
    Dong, Y. J.
    Ye, H. X.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 278 - 278
  • [30] PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF THE ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY ANALYSIS (ERA) TEST IN THE INFERTILITY WORK-UP TO GUIDE PERSONALIZED EMBRYO TRANSFER VERSUS FRESH TRANSFER OR DEFERRED EMBRYO TRANSFER.
    Simon, C.
    Vladimirov, I. K.
    Castillon Cortes, G.
    Ortega, I.
    Cabanillas, S.
    Vidal, C.
    Giles, J.
    Izquierdo, A.
    Portela, S.
    Fernandez, I.
    Ferrando, M.
    Mackens, S.
    Barrera, S.
    Pellicer, A.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : E46 - E47