The impact of an endometrial receptivity array on personalizing embryo transfer for patients with infertility: a meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Tran, Huy Phuong [1 ]
Tran, Thuy Thi-Thanh [1 ]
Le, Ly Thi [2 ]
Pham, Bao The [3 ]
Vu, Sang Ngoc-Thanh [3 ]
Ly, Loc Thai [1 ]
Hoang, Tuyet Thi-Diem [1 ]
机构
[1] Hung Vuong Hosp, Infertil Dept, 128 Hong Bang St,Ward 12,Dist 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, Int Univ, Sch Biotechnol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Sai Gon Univ, Informat Sci Fac, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
来源
F&S REVIEWS | 2022年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
Endometrial receptivity array; ERA test; IVF outcomes; personalized embryo transfer; window of implantation; RECURRENT IMPLANTATION FAILURE; FRESH BLASTOCYST TRANSFER; PREGNANCY OUTCOMES; ERA TEST; FROZEN; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.06.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. Evidence Review: The PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were searched. We included studies investigating IVF outcomes between patients who underwent standard embryo transfer and personalized embryo transfer (PET) guided by the ERA results. The main outcome measures were the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate (LBR). The random -effects model was applied to pool data. We evaluated cohort and randomized controlled trial studies using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results: Seventeen studies (7,052 patients, 4 randomized controlled trials, and 13 cohort studies) were included in this meta -analysis. Personalized embryo transfer on the basis of ERA was not found to optimize the gestational outcomes, including the implantation rate (risk ratio [RR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.2), clinical pregnancy rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.11), and miscarriage rate (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.81-1.54). Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients undergoing PET in the first IVF cycle had a markedly increased LBR (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.49). Conversely, PET among patients with a history of recurrent implantation failure did not enhance the LBR (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36). Conclusion: Endometrial receptivity array shows no significant improvement in IVF outcomes except in the LBR for patients undergoing the first IVF cycle. Additional research is required to ascertain the efficacy of ERA before achieving wider usage. PROSPERO Number: CRD42021255124. (Fertil Steril Rev (R) 2022;3:157-73. (c) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 173
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis on Pregnancy Outcomes In Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Irene Zolfaroli
    Ana Monzó Miralles
    Juan José Hidalgo-Mora
    Beatriz Marcos Puig
    José María Rubio Rubio
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 985 - 994
  • [2] Endometrial receptivity array before frozen embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arian, Sara E.
    Hessami, Kamran
    Khatibi, Ali
    To, Alvin K.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    Gibbons, William
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (02) : 229 - 238
  • [3] Impact of endometrial receptivity analysis on pregnancy outcomes In patients undergoing embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Irene, Z.
    Monzo Miralles, A. M.
    Hidalgo Mora, J. J.
    Marcos Puig, B.
    Rubio Rubio, J. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [4] Correction to: Impact of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis on Pregnancy Outcomes In Patients Undergoing Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Irene Zolfaroli
    Ana Monzó Miralles
    Juan José Hidalgo‑Mora
    Beatriz Marcos Puig
    José María Rubio Rubio
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 995 - 995
  • [5] Personalized embryo transfer guided by endometrial receptivity analysis: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Glujovsky, D.
    Lattes, K.
    Miguens, M.
    Pesce, R.
    Ciapponi, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (07) : 1305 - 1317
  • [6] Response letter to Endometrial receptivity array before frozen embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hessami, Kamran
    Khatibi, Ali
    Arian, Sara E.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 119 (05) : 892 - 892
  • [7] Personalized embryo transfer guided by transcriptomic endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) in infertile patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Glujovsky, D.
    Lattes, K.
    Miguens, M.
    Pesce, R.
    Ciapponi, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38
  • [8] The Clinical Efficacy of Personalized Embryo Transfer Guided by the Endometrial Receptivity Array/Analysis on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Zhenteng
    Liu, Xuemei
    Wang, Meimei
    Zhao, Huishan
    He, Shunzhi
    Lai, Shoucui
    Qu, Qinglan
    Wang, Xinrong
    Zhao, Dongmei
    Bao, Hongchu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [9] Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Bassil, Rawad
    Casper, Robert
    Samara, Nivin
    Hsieh, Tzu-Bou
    Barzilay, Eran
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Haas, Jigal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2018, 35 (07) : 1301 - 1305
  • [10] Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?
    Rawad Bassil
    Robert Casper
    Nivin Samara
    Tzu-Bou Hsieh
    Eran Barzilay
    Raoul Orvieto
    Jigal Haas
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2018, 35 : 1301 - 1305