Safety of An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol After Head and Neck Free Tissue Transfer

被引:0
|
作者
Schuman, Ari D. [1 ]
Bindal, Mohini [1 ]
Amadio, Grace [1 ]
Turney, Anne M. [1 ]
Hernandez, David J. [1 ]
Sandulache, Vlad C. [1 ]
Liou, N. Eddie [1 ]
Wang, Ray [1 ]
Huang, Andrew T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Bobby R Alford Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Houston, TX USA
[2] One Baylor Plaza,NA 102, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2024年 / 134卷 / 11期
关键词
microvascular reconstruction; oral cavity; skin cancer; CANCER SURGERY; RECONSTRUCTION; STAY;
D O I
10.1002/lary.31564
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and decreasing length of stay (LOS) have become a priority for major surgeries, including microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT) reconstruction of the head and neck. We describe an ERAS protocol with the goal to further reduce length of stay beyond national medians. Methods: Retrospective chart review between August 2016 and February 2023, including all patients who underwent MVFTT after oral cavity, skull base, salivary gland, and cutaneous ablative surgery. An ERAS protocol was implemented in March 2020. Results: A total of 383 patients were included. Approximately 59.8% underwent oral cavity MVFTT, 34.5% cutaneous and lateral skull base, and 5.8% maxillary and anterior skull base. A total of 209 (54.7%) patients had surgery prior to implementation of the ERAS protocol and 174 (45.3%) after. Median LOS decreased from 9 days (interquartile interval [IQR] 8-11) to 6 (IQR 5-7.5, p < 0.0001) following oral cavity MVFTT. For cutaneous and lateral skull base reconstruction, median LOS decreased from 6 days (IQR 5-8) to 3 (IQR 3-7, p < 0.0001). For anterior skull base and sinonasal MVFTT, median LOS decreased from 8 (IQR 7-9) to 5 days (IQR 4.5-7, p = 0.0005). Rate of discharge to skilled nursing or subacute rehabilitation facilities decreased (24% before ERAS, 9.2% after, p < 0.0001). Thirty-day readmission rate was similar before and after implementation (10.5% vs. 10.3, p = 0.954). Discharge to facility was associated with readmission (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.12-4.89, p = 0.024). Conclusion and Relevance: Implementation of the ERAS protocol was associated with decreased LOS. There was no increase in rate of readmission.
引用
收藏
页码:4527 / 4534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?
    Bianchini, Chiara
    Pelucchi, Stefano
    Pastore, Antonio
    Feo, Carlo V.
    Ciorba, Andrea
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) : 439 - 443
  • [42] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?
    Chiara Bianchini
    Stefano Pelucchi
    Antonio Pastore
    Carlo V. Feo
    Andrea Ciorba
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014, 271 : 439 - 443
  • [43] Arterial blood flow changes after free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction
    Sekido, M
    Yamamoto, Y
    Sugihara, T
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (06) : 1547 - 1552
  • [44] Fistulae After Successful Free Tissue Transfer to Head and Neck: Its Prevention and Treatment
    Deek, Nidal Farhan A. L.
    Wei, Fu-Chan
    Tsao, Chung-Kan
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 43 (04) : 739 - +
  • [45] Mayo Clinic Experience with Unfavorable Results After Free Tissue Transfer to Head and Neck
    Nagel, Thomas H.
    Hayden, Richard E.
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 43 (04) : 669 - +
  • [46] Microvascular free tissue transfer after prior radiotherapy in head and neck reconstruction - A review
    Thankappan, Krishnakumar
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2010, 19 (04): : 227 - 234
  • [47] Reducing morbidity and complications after major head and neck cancer surgery: the (future) role of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols
    Huber, Gerhard F.
    Dort, Joseph C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 26 (02): : 71 - 77
  • [48] Enhanced recovery in patients having free tissue transfer for head and neck cancer: does it make a difference?
    Bater, M.
    King, W.
    Teare, J.
    D'Souza, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (10): : 1024 - 1029
  • [49] EXPLORING ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY PROTOCOL FOR URETEROSCOPY
    Portis, Andrew
    Iannazzo, Stephanie
    Borofsky, Michael
    Neises, Suzanne
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E652 - E653
  • [50] THE ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY PROTOCOL FOR RIGHT COLECTOMY
    Naoi, Daishi
    Horie, Hisanaga
    Koinuma, Koji
    Inoue, Yoshiyuki
    Ito, Homare
    Kono, Yosihiko
    Mori, Katsusuke
    Tahara, Makiko
    Sadatomo, Ai
    Sakuma, Yasunaru
    Hosoya, Yoshinori
    Kitayama, Joji
    Lefor, Alan K.
    Sata, Naohiro
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S1351 - S1351