Safety of An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol After Head and Neck Free Tissue Transfer

被引:0
|
作者
Schuman, Ari D. [1 ]
Bindal, Mohini [1 ]
Amadio, Grace [1 ]
Turney, Anne M. [1 ]
Hernandez, David J. [1 ]
Sandulache, Vlad C. [1 ]
Liou, N. Eddie [1 ]
Wang, Ray [1 ]
Huang, Andrew T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Bobby R Alford Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Houston, TX USA
[2] One Baylor Plaza,NA 102, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2024年 / 134卷 / 11期
关键词
microvascular reconstruction; oral cavity; skin cancer; CANCER SURGERY; RECONSTRUCTION; STAY;
D O I
10.1002/lary.31564
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and decreasing length of stay (LOS) have become a priority for major surgeries, including microvascular free tissue transfer (MVFTT) reconstruction of the head and neck. We describe an ERAS protocol with the goal to further reduce length of stay beyond national medians. Methods: Retrospective chart review between August 2016 and February 2023, including all patients who underwent MVFTT after oral cavity, skull base, salivary gland, and cutaneous ablative surgery. An ERAS protocol was implemented in March 2020. Results: A total of 383 patients were included. Approximately 59.8% underwent oral cavity MVFTT, 34.5% cutaneous and lateral skull base, and 5.8% maxillary and anterior skull base. A total of 209 (54.7%) patients had surgery prior to implementation of the ERAS protocol and 174 (45.3%) after. Median LOS decreased from 9 days (interquartile interval [IQR] 8-11) to 6 (IQR 5-7.5, p < 0.0001) following oral cavity MVFTT. For cutaneous and lateral skull base reconstruction, median LOS decreased from 6 days (IQR 5-8) to 3 (IQR 3-7, p < 0.0001). For anterior skull base and sinonasal MVFTT, median LOS decreased from 8 (IQR 7-9) to 5 days (IQR 4.5-7, p = 0.0005). Rate of discharge to skilled nursing or subacute rehabilitation facilities decreased (24% before ERAS, 9.2% after, p < 0.0001). Thirty-day readmission rate was similar before and after implementation (10.5% vs. 10.3, p = 0.954). Discharge to facility was associated with readmission (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.12-4.89, p = 0.024). Conclusion and Relevance: Implementation of the ERAS protocol was associated with decreased LOS. There was no increase in rate of readmission.
引用
收藏
页码:4527 / 4534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced recovery after surgery program involving preoperative dexamethasone administration for head and neck surgery with free tissue transfer reconstruction: Single-center prospective observational study
    Imai, Takayuki
    Kurosawa, Koreyuki
    Asada, Yukinori
    Momma, Yumiko
    Takahashi, Maki
    Satake, Naoko
    Azuma, Misato
    Suzuki, Ai
    Sasaki, Megumi
    Morita, Sinkichi
    Saijo, Satoshi
    Fujii, Keitaro
    Kishimoto, Kazuhiro
    Yamazaki, Tomoko
    Goto, Takahiro
    Matsuura, Kazuto
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2020, 34 : 197 - 205
  • [22] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery Requiring Microvascular Reconstruction
    Hanba, Curtis
    Lewis, Carol
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 56 (04) : 801 - 812
  • [23] Utilization of free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery
    Smith, Russell B.
    Sniezek, Joseph C.
    Weed, Donald T.
    Wax, Mark K.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 137 (02) : 182 - 191
  • [24] Free tissue transfer for head and neck defects in salvage surgery after radiotherapy-based treatments
    Baek, Chung-hwan
    Chung, Man Ki
    Jeong, Han-sin
    Son, Young-ik
    Park, Ki Nam
    Kim, Do Hun
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 49 : S84 - S84
  • [25] Preoperative assessment of hyperactive delirium risk after head and neck surgery with free tissue transfer reconstruction
    Imai, Takayuki
    Takasago, Teiko
    Nakanome, Ayako
    Morita, Shinkichi
    Miyakura, Yuya
    Sasaki, Kento
    Ito, Kazue
    Goto, Takahiro
    Asada, Yukinori
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2024, 51 (06) : 929 - 932
  • [26] Enhanced recovery after head and neck cancer surgery: a review of current literature
    Watson, Laura-Jayne
    Ewers, Caroline
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 28 (03): : 161 - 164
  • [27] Enhanced recovery after surgery, current, and future considerations in head and neck cancer
    List, Marna A.
    Knackstedt, Mark
    Liu, Lucy
    Kasabali, Ahmad
    Mansour, Jobran
    Pang, John
    Asarkar, Ameya A.
    Nathan, Cherie-Ann
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 8 (05): : 1240 - 1256
  • [28] The impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for major head and neck oncologic surgery on postoperative complications and adjuvant treatment delivery
    Frenkel, Catherine H.
    Donahue, Erin E.
    Cochran, Allyson
    Brickman, Daniel
    Hong, Steven
    Ward, Matthew C.
    Moeller, Benjamin J.
    Carrizosa, Daniel R.
    Milas, Zvonimir L.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2025, 47 (01): : 68 - 80
  • [29] The fate of the free flap pedicle after free tissue transfer to the head and neck area
    Van Genechten, Maarten L. V.
    Batstone, Martin D.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 65 : 65 - 67
  • [30] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer (Vol 281, Pg 907, 2024)
    Nieminen, Teija
    Tapiovaara, Laura
    Back, Leif
    Lindford, Andrew
    Lassus, Patrik
    Lehtonen, Lasse
    Makitie, Antti
    Keski-Santti, Harri
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (06) : 3313 - 3314