Benchmarking Methods for PROTAC Ternary Complex Structure Prediction

被引:5
|
作者
Rovers, Evianne [1 ,2 ]
Schapira, Matthieu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Struct Genom Consortium, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Pharmacol, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
ANTIBODY-MEDIATED DELIVERY; PROTEIN; GROMACS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00426
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional compounds that recruit an E3 ligase to a target protein to induce ubiquitination and degradation of the target. Rational optimization of PROTAC requires a structural model of the ternary complex. In the absence of an experimental structure, computational tools have emerged that attempt to predict PROTAC ternary complexes. Here, we systematically benchmark three commonly used tools: PRosettaC, MOE, and ICM. We find that these PROTAC-focused methods produce an array of ternary complex structures, including some that are observed experimentally, but also many that significantly deviate from the crystal structure. Molecular dynamics simulations show that PROTAC complexes may exist in a multiplicity of configurational states and question the use of experimentally observed structures as a reference for accurate predictions. The pioneering computational tools benchmarked here highlight the promises and challenges in the field and may be more valuable when guided by clear structural and biophysical data. The benchmarking data set that we provide may also be valuable for evaluating other and future computational tools for ternary complex modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:6162 / 6173
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Benchmarking and revisiting time series forecasting methods in cloud workload prediction
    Lin, Shengsheng
    Lin, Weiwei
    Zhao, Feiyu
    Chen, Haojun
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2025, 28 (01):
  • [42] Benchmarking pKa prediction methods for Lys115 in acetoacetate decarboxylase
    Yuli Liu
    Anand H. G. Patel
    Steven K. Burger
    Paul W. Ayers
    Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2017, 23
  • [43] Comparing and benchmarking engineering methods for the prediction of X-31 aerodynamics
    Mendenhall, Michael R.
    Perkins, Stanley C., Jr.
    Tomac, Maxmillian
    Rizzi, Arthur
    Nangia, Raj K.
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 20 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [44] BAF complex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design
    Farnaby, William
    Koegl, Manfred
    Roy, Michael J.
    Whitworth, Claire
    Diers, Emelyne
    Trainor, Nicole
    Zollman, David
    Steurer, Steffen
    Karolyi-Oezguer, Jale
    Riedmueller, Carina
    Gmaschitz, Teresa
    Wachter, Johannes
    Dank, Christian
    Galante, Michael
    Sharps, Bernadette
    Rumpel, Klaus
    Traxler, Elisabeth
    Gerstberger, Thomas
    Schnitzer, Renate
    Petermann, Oliver
    Grebe, Peter
    Weinstabl, Harald
    Bader, Gerd
    Zoephel, Andreas
    Weiss-Puxbaum, Alexander
    Ehrenhoefer-Woelfer, Katharina
    Woehrle, Simon
    Boehmelt, Guido
    Rinnenthal, Joerg
    Arnhof, Heribert
    Wiechens, Nicola
    Wu, Meng-Ying
    Owen-Hughes, Tom
    Ettmayer, Peter
    Pearson, Mark
    McConnell, Darryl B.
    Ciulli, Alessio
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 15 (07) : 672 - +
  • [45] BAF complex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design
    William Farnaby
    Manfred Koegl
    Michael J. Roy
    Claire Whitworth
    Emelyne Diers
    Nicole Trainor
    David Zollman
    Steffen Steurer
    Jale Karolyi-Oezguer
    Carina Riedmueller
    Teresa Gmaschitz
    Johannes Wachter
    Christian Dank
    Michael Galant
    Bernadette Sharps
    Klaus Rumpel
    Elisabeth Traxler
    Thomas Gerstberger
    Renate Schnitzer
    Oliver Petermann
    Peter Greb
    Harald Weinstabl
    Gerd Bader
    Andreas Zoephel
    Alexander Weiss-Puxbaum
    Katharina Ehrenhöfer-Wölfer
    Simon Wöhrle
    Guido Boehmelt
    Joerg Rinnenthal
    Heribert Arnhof
    Nicola Wiechens
    Meng-Ying Wu
    Tom Owen-Hughes
    Peter Ettmayer
    Mark Pearson
    Darryl B. McConnell
    Alessio Ciulli
    Nature Chemical Biology, 2019, 15 : 672 - 680
  • [46] Benchmarking pKa prediction methods for Lys115 in acetoacetate decarboxylase
    Liu, Yuli
    Patel, Anand H. G.
    Burger, Steven K.
    Ayers, Paul W.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2017, 23 (05)
  • [47] CompaRNA: a server for continuous benchmarking of automated methods for RNA secondary structure prediction (vol 41, pg 4307, 2013)
    Puton, Tomasz
    Kozlowski, Lukasz P.
    Rother, Kristian M.
    Bujnicki, Janusz M.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (08) : 5403 - 5406
  • [48] Structure Prediction of Ternary Oxide Sub-Nanoparticles
    Woodley, S. M.
    MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2009, 24 (03) : 255 - 264
  • [49] Dynamic Detection of the E3-PROTAC-Target Protein Ternary Complex In Vitro and In Vivo via Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation
    Lei, Kunjian
    Sheng, Yilei
    Li, Yishuang
    Zhou, Zhihong
    Zhu, Xingen
    Huang, Kai
    ACS OMEGA, 2024,
  • [50] A low pressure axial fan for benchmarking prediction methods for aerodynamic performance and sound
    Carolus, Thomas
    Zhu, Tao
    Sturm, Michael
    NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 63 (06) : 537 - 545