Benchmarking Methods for PROTAC Ternary Complex Structure Prediction

被引:5
|
作者
Rovers, Evianne [1 ,2 ]
Schapira, Matthieu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Struct Genom Consortium, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Pharmacol, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
ANTIBODY-MEDIATED DELIVERY; PROTEIN; GROMACS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00426
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional compounds that recruit an E3 ligase to a target protein to induce ubiquitination and degradation of the target. Rational optimization of PROTAC requires a structural model of the ternary complex. In the absence of an experimental structure, computational tools have emerged that attempt to predict PROTAC ternary complexes. Here, we systematically benchmark three commonly used tools: PRosettaC, MOE, and ICM. We find that these PROTAC-focused methods produce an array of ternary complex structures, including some that are observed experimentally, but also many that significantly deviate from the crystal structure. Molecular dynamics simulations show that PROTAC complexes may exist in a multiplicity of configurational states and question the use of experimentally observed structures as a reference for accurate predictions. The pioneering computational tools benchmarked here highlight the promises and challenges in the field and may be more valuable when guided by clear structural and biophysical data. The benchmarking data set that we provide may also be valuable for evaluating other and future computational tools for ternary complex modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:6162 / 6173
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] General Stepwise Approach to Optimize a TR-FRET Assay for Characterizing the BRD/PROTAC/CRBN Ternary Complex
    Lin, Wenwei
    Chen, Taosheng
    ACS PHARMACOLOGY & TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 4 (02) : 941 - 952
  • [32] Advances in designing ternary complexes: Integrating in-silico and biochemical methods for PROTAC optimisation in target protein degradation
    Shaik, Shareef
    Gayam, Prasanna Kumar Reddy
    Chaudhary, Manish
    Singh, Gurvinder
    Pai, Aravinda
    BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2024, 153
  • [33] On the prediction of ternary semiconductor properties by artificial intelligence methods
    Zeng, YZ
    Chua, SJ
    Wu, P
    CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 2002, 14 (07) : 2989 - 2998
  • [34] Structure-based PROTAC design demonstrates BAF complex ATPase vulnerabilities in cancer
    Koegl, Manfred
    Farnaby, William
    Whitworth, Claire
    Roy, Michael
    Diers, Emelyne
    Trainor, Nicole
    Steurer, Steffen
    Riedmueller, Carina
    Gmaschitz, Teresa
    Wachter, Johannes
    Dank, Christian
    Gallant, Michael
    Sharps, Bernadette
    Rumpel, Klaus
    Traxler, Elisabeth
    Lorenz, Romario
    Petermann, Oliver
    Greb, Peter
    Weinstabl, Harald
    Bader, Gerd
    Zoephel, Andreas
    Weiss-Puxbaum, Alexander
    Rinnenthal, Joerg
    Arnnhof, Heribert
    Wiechens, Nicola
    Wu, Meng-Ying
    Owen-Hughes, Tom
    Ettmayer, Peter
    Pearson, Mark
    McConnell, Darryl B.
    Ciulli, Alessio
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (13)
  • [35] Structure of the measles virus ternary polymerase complex
    Dong Wang
    Ge Yang
    Bin Liu
    Nature Communications, 16 (1)
  • [36] Crystal structure of a nuclear actin ternary complex
    Cao, Tingting
    Sun, Lingfei
    Jiang, Yuxiang
    Huang, Shanjin
    Wang, Jiawei
    Chen, Zhucheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (32) : 8985 - 8990
  • [37] Automated benchmarking of combined protein structure and ligand conformation prediction
    Leemann, Michele
    Sagasta, Ander
    Eberhardt, Jerome
    Schwede, Torsten
    Robin, Xavier
    Durairaj, Janani
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 91 (12) : 1912 - 1924
  • [38] PRosettaC: Rosetta Based Modeling of PROTAC Mediated Ternary Complexes
    Zaidman, Daniel
    Prilusky, Jaime
    London, Nir
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2020, 60 (10) : 4894 - 4903
  • [39] An automated benchmarking platform for MHC class II binding prediction methods
    Andreatta, Massimo
    Trolle, Thomas
    Yan, Zhen
    Greenbaum, Jason A.
    Peters, Bjoern
    Nielsen, Morten
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 34 (09) : 1522 - 1528
  • [40] Benchmarking Parametric and Machine Learning Models for Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits
    Azodi, Christina B.
    Bolger, Emily
    McCarren, Andrew
    Roantree, Mark
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    Shiu, Shin-Han
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2019, 9 (11): : 3691 - 3702