3-D Rock Mass Strength Criteria-A Review of the Current Status

被引:2
|
作者
Kulatilake, Pinnaduwa H. S. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Rock Mech & Rock Engn, Ganzhou 341000, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Min & Geol Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
GEOTECHNICS | 2021年 / 1卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
rock mass strength; anisotropy; scale effects; intermediate principal stress; discontinuity geometry; fracture tensor components; discontinuity mechanical properties; physical modeling; empirical modeling; numerical modeling; DISTINCT ELEMENT MODEL; BONDED-PARTICLE MODEL; FINITE-SIZE JOINTS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; STRESS-ANALYSIS; SHEAR-STRENGTH; SPECIMEN SIZE; DAM SITE; DEFORMABILITY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.3390/geotechnics1010007
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The presence of complex discontinuity patterns, the inherent statistical nature of their geometrical parameters, the uncertainties involved in the estimation of the discontinuity geometrical and geo-mechanical properties and complex three dimensional (3-D) in-situ stress make the accurate prediction of rock mass strength a difficult task. It has been a great challenge for the rock mechanics and rock engineering professions to develop a rock mass strength criterion in three dimensions that incorporates the effect of the minor and intermediate principal stresses and captures the scale dependent and anisotropic properties resulting from the discontinuity geometry parameters, such as the number of discontinuity sets, 3-D discontinuity intensity, and the distributions of the discontinuity orientation and size. Rock mechanics and rock engineering researchers have dealt with this topic for more than 55 years. The paper provides a critical review of the current state of the art regarding 3-D jointed rock mass strength criteria. The shortcomings of several rock mass strength criteria are discussed. The historic development of rock mass strength criteria that incorporate the effect of the minor and intermediate principal stresses and capture the scale dependent and anisotropic properties is presented. The most advanced 3-D rock mass strength criteria currently available in the literature are presented, including suggested future improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 146
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Fracture analysis of rock mass based on 3-D nonlinear Finite Element Method
    LIU YaoRu CHANG Qiang YANG Qiang WANG ChuanQi GUAN FuHai State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing China
    [J]. Science China(Technological Sciences), 2011, 54 (03) : 556 - 564
  • [23] Efficient and automatic plane detection approach for 3-D rock mass point clouds
    Liang Hu
    Jun Xiao
    Ying Wang
    [J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020, 79 : 839 - 864
  • [24] Fracture analysis of rock mass based on 3-D nonlinear Finite Element Method
    Liu YaoRu
    Chang Qiang
    Yang Qiang
    Wang ChuanQi
    Guan FuHai
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 54 (03) : 556 - 564
  • [25] A 3-D block deformation analysis for JY underground openings in jointed rock mass
    Li, N
    Chen, FX
    Han, X
    Cui, ZQ
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND ADVANCES IN GEOMECHANICS, VOL 4, 1998, : 2537 - 2540
  • [26] Fracture analysis of rock mass based on 3-D nonlinear Finite Element Method
    YaoRu Liu
    Qiang Chang
    Qiang Yang
    ChuanQi Wang
    FuHai Guan
    [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54 : 556 - 564
  • [27] 3-D net work numerical modeling technique for random discontinuities of rock mass
    Chen, J.P.
    [J]. Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2001, 23 (04):
  • [28] INDUSTRIAL-STRENGTH 3-D
    WILLIAMS, G
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1990, 60 (02): : 40 - 42
  • [29] A review of current research in 3-D machine vision and robot accuracy
    Edwards, C
    Starr, AG
    [J]. LASER METROLOGY AND MACHINE PERFORMANCE III, 1997, : 423 - 430
  • [30] Design criteria for 3-D seismic acquisition
    Berkhout, AJ
    Ongkiehong, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION, 1998, 7 (01): : 65 - 72