Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects with Double-Barrel Fibula Flap and Osseo-Integrated Implants: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Khayat, Saad [1 ]
Urmeneta, Angela Sada [1 ]
Moure, Borja Gonzalez [1 ]
Acosta, Diego Fernandez [1 ]
Anguita, Marta Benito [1 ]
Lopez, Ana Lopez [1 ]
Martin, Juan Jose Verdaguer [1 ,2 ]
Cuellar, Ignacio Navarro [1 ]
Falahat, Farzin [3 ]
Navarro Cuellar, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gregorio Maranon, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Med, Surg Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain
[3] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
dental implants; double-barrel; fibula flap; mandibular reconstruction; VERTICAL DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOSEPTOCUTANEOUS FREE-FLAP; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; IMMEDIATE; REHABILITATION; STABILITY; RESECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13123547
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Mandibular defects resulting from oncological treatment pose significant aesthetic and functional challenges due to the involvement of bone and soft tissues. Immediate reconstruction is crucial to address complications such as malocclusion, mandibular deviation, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes, and soft tissue retraction. These issues can lead to functional impairments, including difficulties in chewing, swallowing, and speech. The fibula flap is widely used for mandibular reconstruction due to its long bone segment and robust vascular supply, though it may not always provide adequate bone height for optimal dental rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to determine if the double-barreled fibula flap (DBFF) configuration is a viable alternative for mandibular reconstruction and to evaluate the outcomes of dental implants placed in this type of flap. Materials and Methods: This study adhered to the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and PRISMA guidelines and was registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Database (INPLASY2023120026). We included clinical studies published in English, Spanish, or French that focused on adult patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy followed by DBFF reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. Data sources included Medline/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and manual searches. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction captured variables such as publication year, patient demographics, number of implants, follow-up duration, flap survival, implant failure, and aesthetic outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI appraisal tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: A total of 17 clinical studies were included, evaluating 245 patients and 402 dental implants. The average patient age was 43.7 years, with a mean follow-up period of 34.3 months. Flap survival was high, with a 98.3% success rate and only four flap losses. The implant failure rate was low at 1.74%. Esthetic outcomes were varied, with only three studies using standardized protocols for evaluation. The overall certainty of evidence for flap survival was moderate, low for implant failure, and very low for aesthetics due to the subjective nature of assessments and variability in reporting. Conclusions: The primary limitations of the evidence included in this review are the observational design of the studies, leading to an inherent risk of bias, inconsistency in reporting methods, and imprecision in outcome measures. Additionally, the subjective nature of aesthetic evaluations and the variability in assessment tools further limit the reliability of the findings. The DBFF technique demonstrates excellent outcomes for mandibular reconstruction, with high flap survival and low implant failure rates, making it a viable option for dental rehabilitation. However, the evidence for aesthetic outcomes is less certain, highlighting the need for more rigorous and standardized research. This review supports the DBFF as a good alternative for mandibular reconstruction with successful dental implant integration, although further studies are needed to enhance the reliability of aesthetic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One-stage, double-barrel fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap and immediate dental implants for functional and aesthetic reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects
    Chang, Yang-Ming
    Tsai, Chi-Ying
    Wei, Fu-Chan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (01) : 143 - 145
  • [2] Double-Barrel Fibula Flap Versus Vascularized Iliac Crest Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction
    Yu, Yao
    Zhang, Wen-Bo
    Liu, Xiao-Jing
    Guo, Chuan-Bin
    Yu, Guang-Yan
    Peng, Xin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (05) : 844 - 850
  • [3] Reconstruction of partial maxillary defects with the double-barrel fibula free flap
    Baj, A.
    Youssef, D. Ali
    Monteverdi, R.
    Bianchi, B.
    Combi, V. A.
    Gianni, A. B.
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2010, 30 (06) : 299 - 302
  • [4] Double-Barrel Fibula Vascularized Free Flap With Dental Rehabilitation for Mandibular Reconstruction
    He, Yue
    Zhang, Zhi Yuan
    Zhu, Han Guang
    Wu, Yi Qun
    Fu, Hong Hai
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (10) : 2663 - 2669
  • [5] Outcome of Osseointegrated Dental Implants in Double-Barrel and Vertically Distracted Fibula Osteoseptocutaneous Free Flaps for Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction
    Chang, Yang-Ming
    Wallace, Christopher Glenn
    Hsu, Yueh-Min
    Shen, Yu-Fu
    Tsai, Chi-Yin
    Wei, Fu-Chan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (05) : 1033 - 1043
  • [6] The Biaxial Double-Barrel Fibula Flap-A Simplified Technique for Fibula Maxillary Reconstruction
    Khatib, Baber
    Patel, Ashish
    Dierks, Eric J.
    Bell, R. Bryan
    Cheng, Allen
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (02) : 412 - 425
  • [7] Central Mandibular Reconstruction by Semiopen Wedge Osteotomy Double-barrel Fibula Flap for a Slim Aesthetic Appearance
    Tsuge, Itaru
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    Katsube, Motoki
    Sowa, Yoshihiro
    Sakamoto, Michiharu
    Morimoto, Naoki
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [8] Double-Barrel Versus Single-Barrel Fibula Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction: Safety and Outcomes
    Trilles, Jorge
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Daar, David A.
    Anzai, Lavinia
    Boczar, Daniel
    Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez
    Hirsch, David L.
    Jacobson, Adam S.
    Levine, Jamie P.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (08): : 1576 - 1581
  • [9] Comparative evaluation of personalized 3D-printed scaffold-driven double-barrel fibula flap for the reconstruction of segmented mandibular defects
    Zheng, Lingling
    Chen, Dan
    Wang, Chao
    Ai, Liya
    Li, Yongfeng
    Hu, Min
    Aversa, Raffaella
    Wang, Lizhen
    Fan, Yubo
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 234
  • [10] Innovative principle of implant-oriented fibula placement in mandibular reconstruction using double-barrel fibula and simultaneous implants: A technical note
    Li, Xinhui
    AL-Wesabi, Saddam Noman
    Wu, Yingying
    Li, Chunjie
    Hu, Chen
    Deng, Chen
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Gaowei
    Wang, Jing
    Zhu, Guiquan
    Man, Yi
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (02)