Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects with Double-Barrel Fibula Flap and Osseo-Integrated Implants: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Khayat, Saad [1 ]
Urmeneta, Angela Sada [1 ]
Moure, Borja Gonzalez [1 ]
Acosta, Diego Fernandez [1 ]
Anguita, Marta Benito [1 ]
Lopez, Ana Lopez [1 ]
Martin, Juan Jose Verdaguer [1 ,2 ]
Cuellar, Ignacio Navarro [1 ]
Falahat, Farzin [3 ]
Navarro Cuellar, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gregorio Maranon, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Med, Surg Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain
[3] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
dental implants; double-barrel; fibula flap; mandibular reconstruction; VERTICAL DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOSEPTOCUTANEOUS FREE-FLAP; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; IMMEDIATE; REHABILITATION; STABILITY; RESECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13123547
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Mandibular defects resulting from oncological treatment pose significant aesthetic and functional challenges due to the involvement of bone and soft tissues. Immediate reconstruction is crucial to address complications such as malocclusion, mandibular deviation, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes, and soft tissue retraction. These issues can lead to functional impairments, including difficulties in chewing, swallowing, and speech. The fibula flap is widely used for mandibular reconstruction due to its long bone segment and robust vascular supply, though it may not always provide adequate bone height for optimal dental rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to determine if the double-barreled fibula flap (DBFF) configuration is a viable alternative for mandibular reconstruction and to evaluate the outcomes of dental implants placed in this type of flap. Materials and Methods: This study adhered to the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and PRISMA guidelines and was registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Database (INPLASY2023120026). We included clinical studies published in English, Spanish, or French that focused on adult patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy followed by DBFF reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. Data sources included Medline/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and manual searches. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction captured variables such as publication year, patient demographics, number of implants, follow-up duration, flap survival, implant failure, and aesthetic outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI appraisal tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: A total of 17 clinical studies were included, evaluating 245 patients and 402 dental implants. The average patient age was 43.7 years, with a mean follow-up period of 34.3 months. Flap survival was high, with a 98.3% success rate and only four flap losses. The implant failure rate was low at 1.74%. Esthetic outcomes were varied, with only three studies using standardized protocols for evaluation. The overall certainty of evidence for flap survival was moderate, low for implant failure, and very low for aesthetics due to the subjective nature of assessments and variability in reporting. Conclusions: The primary limitations of the evidence included in this review are the observational design of the studies, leading to an inherent risk of bias, inconsistency in reporting methods, and imprecision in outcome measures. Additionally, the subjective nature of aesthetic evaluations and the variability in assessment tools further limit the reliability of the findings. The DBFF technique demonstrates excellent outcomes for mandibular reconstruction, with high flap survival and low implant failure rates, making it a viable option for dental rehabilitation. However, the evidence for aesthetic outcomes is less certain, highlighting the need for more rigorous and standardized research. This review supports the DBFF as a good alternative for mandibular reconstruction with successful dental implant integration, although further studies are needed to enhance the reliability of aesthetic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mandibular reconstruction with single barrel vascular free fibula flap and implants-borne fixed prosthesis: usage of a modified healing abutment
    Si, Jiawen
    Li, Hongliang
    Wang, Minjiao
    Ren, Rong
    Fei, Jiongmei
    Shen, Steve G. F.
    Shi, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (08): : 12635 - 12640
  • [42] Real-time intraoperative computed tomography can accurize virtual surgical planning on the double-barrel fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction
    Lin, Chih-Hung
    Hsu, Chu-Hsiung
    Adarsh, Kudav
    Hsu, Cheng-Ming
    Wu, Chao-Ming
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (08): : 2702 - 2705
  • [43] Mandibular reconstruction using a new design for a patient-specific plate to support a fibular free flap and avoid double-barrel technique
    Tarsitano, Achille
    Battaglia, Salvatore
    Corinaldesi, Giuseppe
    Marchetti, Claudio
    Pellegrino, Gerardo
    Ciocca, Leonardo
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2021, 41 (03) : 230 - 235
  • [44] Late reconstruction of two total metacarpal bone defects using lengthening devices and a double-barrel osteocutaneous free parascapular flap
    Masaki, F
    Takehiro, D
    Ryuuichi, M
    Kumi, M
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (01) : 102 - 106
  • [45] Worldwide 10-Year Systematic Review of Treatment Trends in Fibula Free Flap for Mandibular Reconstruction
    Okay, Devin
    Al Shetawi, Al Haitham
    Moubayed, Sami P.
    Mourad, Moustafa
    Buchbinder, Daniel
    Urken, Mark L.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (12) : 2526 - 2531
  • [46] Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With the Fibula Free Flap A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Barr, Meaghan L.
    Haveles, Christos S.
    Rezzadeh, Kameron S.
    Nolan, Ian T.
    Castro, Ruben
    Lee, Justine C.
    Steinbacher, Derek
    Pfaff, Miles J.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 84 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [47] The use of vascularized fibula flap in mandibular reconstruction; A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies
    Awad, Mohamed E.
    Altman, Amara
    Elrefai, Radwa
    Shipman, Peter
    Looney, Stephen
    Elsalanty, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (04) : 629 - 641
  • [48] Reconstruction of Large Mandibulofacial Defects With the Composed Double Skin Paddle Fibula Free Flap: A Review of 32 Procedures
    Leclere, Franck M.
    Bosc, Romain
    Temam, Stephane
    Leymarie, Nicolas
    Mirghani, Haitham
    Sarfati, Benjamin
    Kolb, Frederic
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (06): : 1336 - 1343
  • [49] RE: HE Y, ZHANG ZY, ZHU HG, ET AL: DOUBLE-BARREL FIBULA VASCULARIZED FREE FLAP WITH DENTAL REHABILITATION FOR MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION. J ORAL MAXILLOFAC SURG 69: 2663, 2011
    Pitak-Arnnop, Poramate
    Hemprich, Alexander
    Dhanuthai, Kittipong
    Pausch, Niels Christian
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (03) : 506 - 506
  • [50] Quantification of the Bimodal Plate-Specific Complication Profile Associated With Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects With Reconstruction Plate and Soft Tissue Flap: Evidence From Systematic Review
    Rymer, Ben C.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (07) : 2072 - 2075