Outcome of Osseointegrated Dental Implants in Double-Barrel and Vertically Distracted Fibula Osteoseptocutaneous Free Flaps for Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction

被引:29
|
作者
Chang, Yang-Ming
Wallace, Christopher Glenn
Hsu, Yueh-Min
Shen, Yu-Fu
Tsai, Chi-Yin
Wei, Fu-Chan
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Coll Med, Taipei 10591, Taiwan
关键词
LONG-TERM EVALUATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; OROMANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; ALVEOLAR BONE; ILIAC CREST; OSTEOGENESIS; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; GRAFTS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000623
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Osseointegrated dental implants in double-barrel, or single-barrel and then vertically distracted, fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flaps can achieve segmental mandibular reconstruction, dental rehabilitation, and premorbid facial height. However, it remains unknown which configuration provides better osseointegration outcomes. Methods: Between 2003 and 2009, all patients who underwent segmental mandibular defect reconstruction using vertical distraction osteogenesis of single-barrel fibula with secondary osseointegration (group A, 10 patients and 35 osseointegrated dental implants) or double-barrel fibula with primary osseointegration (group B, 13 patients and 36 osseointegrated dental implants) were evaluated prospectively for crown-implant ratios, mesial/distal marginal bone losses, and complications. In group B, 18 osseointegrated dental implants were surrounded by palatal mucosal grafts; the other retained fibula skin paddles. Results: Palatal mucosal grafts in group B improved mesial (p < 0.001) and distal (p < 0.001) marginal bone losses. Mesial marginal bone loss of group B with palatal mucosal grafts was better than that of group A (p < 0.05), despite higher crown-implant ratios in group A (p < 0.01). Mesial (p < 0.01) and distal (p < 0.05) marginal bone losses of group A were better than that of group B osseointegrated dental implants without palatal mucosal grafts. Complications in group A were common and complex, unlike group B. All patients completed dental rehabilitation. Conclusions: Osseointegration was adequate to complete dental rehabilitation in group B without palatal mucosal grafts, but was significantly better in group A, and significantly best in group B with palatal mucosal grafts. Given the complexity and frequency of complications in group A, the authors recommend the double-barrel configuration with osseointegrated dental implants for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction. Palatal mucosal grafts have a definite advantage. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1043
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mandibular reconstruction with fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap and osseointegrated dental implants
    Kildal, M
    Wei, FC
    Chang, YM
    Chen, HC
    Chang, MH
    [J]. CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 28 (02) : 403 - +
  • [2] One-stage, double-barrel fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap and immediate dental implants for functional and aesthetic reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects
    Chang, Yang-Ming
    Tsai, Chi-Ying
    Wei, Fu-Chan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 122 (01) : 143 - 145
  • [3] Double-Barrel Fibula Vascularized Free Flap With Dental Rehabilitation for Mandibular Reconstruction
    He, Yue
    Zhang, Zhi Yuan
    Zhu, Han Guang
    Wu, Yi Qun
    Fu, Hong Hai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (10) : 2663 - 2669
  • [4] MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION - OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN MICROVASCULAR FIBULA FREE FLAPS
    ROUMANAS, ED
    MARKOWITZ, BL
    LORANT, JA
    NISHIMURA, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 478 - 478
  • [5] Alignment of the Double-Barrel Fibula Free Flap for Better Cosmesis and Bone Height for Osseointegrated Dental Implants
    Ch'ng, Sydney
    Ashford, Bruce G.
    Clark, Jonathan R.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (04) : 688E - 689E
  • [6] Functional Mandibular Reconstruction With Double-Barrel Fibular Flap and Primary Osseointegrated Dental Implants Improve Facial Esthetic Outcome
    Chen, Jie
    Yin, Ping
    Li, Ning
    Wu, Limeng
    Jian, Xinchun
    Jiang, Canhua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (01) : 218 - 225
  • [7] Maxillary reconstruction with a fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap and simultaneous insertion of osseointegrated dental implants
    Chang, YM
    Coskunfirat, OK
    Wei, FC
    Tsai, CY
    Lin, HN
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (04) : 1140 - 1145
  • [8] Double-Barrel Versus Single-Barrel Fibula Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction: Safety and Outcomes
    Trilles, Jorge
    Chaya, Bachar F.
    Daar, David A.
    Anzai, Lavinia
    Boczar, Daniel
    Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez
    Hirsch, David L.
    Jacobson, Adam S.
    Levine, Jamie P.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2022, 132 (08): : 1576 - 1581
  • [9] Primary insertion of osseointegrated dental implants into fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap for mandible reconstruction
    Chang, YM
    Santamaria, E
    Wei, FC
    Chen, HC
    Chan, CP
    Shen, YF
    Hou, SP
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (03) : 680 - 688
  • [10] Reconstruction following resection of large mandibular Ameloblastomas using the free osteoseptocutaneous fibula flap and immediate osseointegrated dental implants
    Chana, JS
    Chang, YM
    Wei, FC
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INAUGURAL CONGRESS OF THE WORLD SOCIETY FOR RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2001, : 109 - 111