Outcome of Osseointegrated Dental Implants in Double-Barrel and Vertically Distracted Fibula Osteoseptocutaneous Free Flaps for Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction

被引:29
|
作者
Chang, Yang-Ming
Wallace, Christopher Glenn
Hsu, Yueh-Min
Shen, Yu-Fu
Tsai, Chi-Yin
Wei, Fu-Chan
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Coll Med, Taipei 10591, Taiwan
关键词
LONG-TERM EVALUATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; OROMANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; ALVEOLAR BONE; ILIAC CREST; OSTEOGENESIS; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; GRAFTS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000623
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Osseointegrated dental implants in double-barrel, or single-barrel and then vertically distracted, fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flaps can achieve segmental mandibular reconstruction, dental rehabilitation, and premorbid facial height. However, it remains unknown which configuration provides better osseointegration outcomes. Methods: Between 2003 and 2009, all patients who underwent segmental mandibular defect reconstruction using vertical distraction osteogenesis of single-barrel fibula with secondary osseointegration (group A, 10 patients and 35 osseointegrated dental implants) or double-barrel fibula with primary osseointegration (group B, 13 patients and 36 osseointegrated dental implants) were evaluated prospectively for crown-implant ratios, mesial/distal marginal bone losses, and complications. In group B, 18 osseointegrated dental implants were surrounded by palatal mucosal grafts; the other retained fibula skin paddles. Results: Palatal mucosal grafts in group B improved mesial (p < 0.001) and distal (p < 0.001) marginal bone losses. Mesial marginal bone loss of group B with palatal mucosal grafts was better than that of group A (p < 0.05), despite higher crown-implant ratios in group A (p < 0.01). Mesial (p < 0.01) and distal (p < 0.05) marginal bone losses of group A were better than that of group B osseointegrated dental implants without palatal mucosal grafts. Complications in group A were common and complex, unlike group B. All patients completed dental rehabilitation. Conclusions: Osseointegration was adequate to complete dental rehabilitation in group B without palatal mucosal grafts, but was significantly better in group A, and significantly best in group B with palatal mucosal grafts. Given the complexity and frequency of complications in group A, the authors recommend the double-barrel configuration with osseointegrated dental implants for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction. Palatal mucosal grafts have a definite advantage. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1033 / 1043
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis
    Chiapasco, M
    Biglioli, F
    Autelitano, L
    Romeo, E
    Brusati, R
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (02) : 220 - 228
  • [42] Survival of dental implants placed in vascularised fibula free flaps after jaw reconstruction
    Attia, Sameh
    Wiltfang, Joerg
    Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern
    Wilbrand, Jan-Falco
    Streckbein, Philipp
    Kaehling, Christopher
    Howaldt, Hans-Peter
    Schaaf, Heidrun
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (08) : 1205 - 1210
  • [44] Chimeric LSMAP Double-barrel Fibula Free Flap: Goal-oriented Surgical Technique and Tips for One-stage Mandibular Reconstruction
    Massarelli, Olindo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (01) : E4040
  • [45] Long-term outcome of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects due to extreme atrophy
    Chiapasco, Matteo
    Romeo, Eugenio
    Coggiola, Alberto
    Brusati, Roberto
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [46] Do osteotomies of the free fibula flap in segmental mandibular reconstruction influence complications and outcome?
    van Gemert, J. T. M.
    Van Cann, E. M.
    Koole, R.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, : 88 - 88
  • [47] One-and-a-Half-Barrel Vascularized Free Fibular Flap for the Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defect
    Ulkur, Ersin
    Karagoz, Huseyin
    Kulahci, Yalcin
    Suer, Berkay Tolga
    Oksuz, Sinan
    Kocyigit, Ismail Doruk
    Acikel, Cengiz
    Urhan, Muammer
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02) : E167 - E169
  • [48] Gap ossification in the double-barrel technique for the reconstruction of mandibular defects by means of the vascularized free fibular flap
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Raul
    Naval-Gias, Luis
    Rodriguez-Campo, Francisco J.
    Munoz-Guerra, Mario F.
    Sastre-Perez, Jesus
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (07) : 2519 - 2520
  • [49] Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Flap and Dental Implants Through Virtual Surgical Planning and Three Different Techniques: Double-Barrel Flap, Implant Dynamic Navigation and CAD/CAM Mesh With Iliac Crest Graft
    Antunez-Conde, Raul
    Salmeron, Jose Ignacio
    Diez-Montiel, Alberto
    Agea, Marc
    Gascon, Dafne
    Sada, Angela
    Navarro Cuellar, Ignacio
    Tousidonis, Manuel
    Ochandiano, Santiago
    Arenas, Gema
    Navarro Cuellar, Carlos
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [50] Problems with dental implants that were placed on vertically distracted fibular free flaps after resection: A report of six cases
    Lizio, Giuseppe
    Corinaldesi, Giuseppe
    Pieri, Francesco
    Marchetti, Claudio
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 47 (06): : 455 - 460