Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure

被引:1
|
作者
Canan, Sultan [1 ]
Inan, Mehmet Arda [2 ]
Erdem, Ahmet [3 ]
Demirdag, Erhan [3 ]
Gunduz, Mualla Ilknur [2 ]
Erdem, Ozlem [2 ]
Erdem, Mehmet [3 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Training & Res Hosp, Clin Obstet & Gynecol, Sakarya, Turkiye
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Pathol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Gazi Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Adhesion molecules; implantation; endometrial receptivity; recurrent implantation failure; recurrent pregnancy loss; MICROVESSEL DENSITY; CERVICAL-CANCER; OVARIAN-CANCER; CD146; EXPRESSION; MARKER; ANGIOGENESIS;
D O I
10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.42959
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The cause of implantation defects in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) has not been clearly established. We aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical changes in HOXA-11, j31 integrin, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), and extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1) molecules during the receptive endometrial period in patients with RIF and RPL. Materials and Methods: This study was retrospectively conducted at a university hospital. After the exclusion of cases with pathology that may cause a change in the level of receptors in the endometrium, biopsies performed during the receptive period were selected, and the patients were categorized into RPL (n=15), RIF (n=16), control (n=16) groups. All preparations were immunohistochemically stained for HOXA-11, j31 integrin, FAK, CD44, and ECM1. Results: HOXA-11 and j31 Integrin expression changes were similar between the RIF and control groups. However, FAK expression was significantly increased in the RIF group (p<0.01). Additionally, ECM1 and CD44 expressions were significantly decreased in the RIF group compared with the control group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the endometrial staining of HOXA-11, FAK, and ECM1 in patients with a history of RPL. However, j31 Integrin and CD44 levels were significantly decreased in the RPL group compared with the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Implantation is a complex process, and altered adhesion mechanisms involved in endometrial receptivity may be related to defective implantation in patients with RIF and RPL. Among the adhesion molecules, the expression of CD44, j31 integrin, FAK, and ECM1 molecules varies in inappropriate implantation compared with the normal population.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 27
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular Determinants of Uterine Receptivity: Comparison of Successful Implantation, Recurrent Miscarriage, and Recurrent Implantation Failure
    Guenther, Veronika
    Allahqoli, Leila
    Deenadayal-Mettler, Anupama
    Maass, Nicolai
    Mettler, Liselotte
    Gitas, Georgios
    Andresen, Kristin
    Schubert, Melanie
    Ackermann, Johannes
    von Otte, Soeren
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (24)
  • [32] Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan
    Ohara, Yasuhiro
    Matsubayashi, Hidehiko
    Suzuki, Yosuke
    Takaya, Yukiko
    Yamaguchi, Kohei
    Doshida, Masakazu
    Takeuchi, Takumi
    Ishikawa, Tomomoto
    Handa, Mika
    Miyake, Tatsuya
    Takiuchi, Tsuyoshi
    Kimura, Tadashi
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [33] Potential innate immunity-related markers of endometrial receptivity and recurrent implantation failure (RIF)
    Basatvat, Shaghayegh
    Russell, Jean Marion
    Saare, Merli
    Thurston, Lisa Marie
    Salumets, Andres
    Fazeli, Alireza
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (04)
  • [34] Evaluation of embryo aneuploidy (PGT-A) and endometrial receptivity (ERA) testing in patients with recurrent implantation failure in ICSI cycles
    Fodina, Violeta
    Dudorova, Alesja
    Erenpreiss, Juris
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 : 17 - 20
  • [35] Recurrent miscarriage and endometrial receptivity
    Mechery, J.
    Shantha, N.
    Polson, D.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 29 (03) : 257 - 258
  • [36] Can We Use Immunological Modulations as a Treatment for Recurrent Implantation Failure and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss?
    Relovska, Sona
    Gargiulo, Antonio
    Anchan, Raymond M.
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2025, 14 (01):
  • [37] Evaluating Chronic Endometritis in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss by Hysteroscopy and Immunohistochemistry
    Zargar, Mahvash
    Ghafourian, Mehri
    Nikbakht, Roshan
    Hosseini, Vahideh Mir
    Choghakabodi, Parastoo Moradi
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [38] Endometrial proteomic signature in recurrent implantation failure
    Dogan, M.
    Demiral, I.
    Akgun, E.
    Ulgen, E.
    Gurel, B.
    Sahin, B.
    Aytan, A. Nehir
    Ozgor, B. Yuksel
    Baykal, A. T.
    Sezerman, U.
    Bastu, E.
    Buyru, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 116 - 117
  • [39] Zooming in on the endometrial factor of recurrent implantation failure
    Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor
    Okewale, Babatunde
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (05) : 848 - 859
  • [40] Status of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure
    Claas, Frans H. J.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 128 : 42 - 42