Exploration of registration and the risk of bias in acupuncture randomised controlled trials: a systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Duan, Yuting [1 ]
Deng, Yuening [1 ]
Tang, Binbin [2 ]
Xu, Zhirui [3 ]
Ye, Xiaolin [2 ]
Lu, Manyi [2 ]
Liu, Shujuan [1 ]
Xiong, Linghui [4 ]
Zhu, Weifeng [1 ]
Yu, Lin [1 ]
Zhao, Pinge [5 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated TCM Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Clin Sch Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Brain Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Med Univ, Dept Integrated Chinese & Western Med, Affiliated Brain Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
Randomized Controlled Trial; China; COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE; Acupuncture;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the predominant type in acupuncture clinical research, and the publications have increased rapidly in recent years, but there is a prevalence of the high risk of bias and poor methodological design in acupuncture RCTs. Clinical trial registration can improve the transparency and credibility of studies by disclosing key information in advance. However, the registration in acupuncture RCTs is not satisfactory, as there is widespread of the under-registration, inconsistency with published studies and insufficient disclosure of key methodological information. Whether registration can reduce the risk of bias in acupuncture RCTs and improve data transparency has not been fully explored. Therefore, we constructed this study to investigate the association between registration and risk of bias and data sharing level in acupuncture RCTs.Methods Seven databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases will be systematically searched between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2024, for acupuncture RCTs. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a predefined standardised format and perform secondary validation. The characteristics and data sharing level of the included studies will be summarised. The risk of bias of included RCTs will be assessed by the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. The risk of bias and registration in acupuncture RCTs will be analysed by logistic or quantile regression analyses (depending on the number of minimum events). The data sharing level and registration will be analysed by quantile regression analyses.Ethics and dissemination As the systematic review aims to consolidate info from published sources, ethical approval is not necessary for this study. The study's findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed academic journal and disseminated via conference presentations. This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework Registries.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials in high-impact ophthalmology journals and general medical journals: a systematic review
    Joksimovic, Lazar
    Koucheki, Robert
    Popovic, Marko
    Ahmed, Yusuf
    Schlenker, Matthew B.
    Ahmed, Iqbal Ike K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 101 (10) : 1309 - 1314
  • [42] Descriptions of sham acupuncture in randomised controlled trials: a critical review of the literature
    Xie, Yixuan
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Tinglan
    Sun, Chiyun
    Xin, Zeyin
    Hu, Yuzhi
    Wang, Yue
    Zhang, Cheng
    Yan, Shiyan
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [43] Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review
    Ross, S
    Grant, A
    Counsell, C
    Gillespie, W
    Russell, I
    Prescott, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (12) : 1143 - 1156
  • [44] Ziconotide Monotherapy: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
    Brookes, Morag E.
    Eldabe, Sam
    Batterham, Alan
    CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 15 (02) : 217 - 231
  • [45] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction
    Hansson, Emma
    Larsson, Camilla
    Uusimaki, Alexandra
    Svensson, Karolina
    Jensen, Emmelie Widmark
    Paganini, Anna
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2024, 59 : 53 - 64
  • [46] Yoga in schizophrenia: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Vancampfort, D.
    Vansteelandt, K.
    Scheewe, T.
    Probst, M.
    Knapen, J.
    De Herdt, A.
    De Hert, M.
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 126 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [47] Panax ginseng in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
    Shergis, Johannah L.
    Zhang, Anthony L.
    Zhou, Wenyu
    Xue, Charlie C.
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (07) : 949 - 965
  • [48] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery
    Cousins, Sian
    Chalmers, Katy
    Kobetic, Matthew
    Vickers, Martha
    Munder, Tonia
    Fairhurst, Katherine
    Avery, Kerry
    Blencowe, Natalie
    Brookes, Sara
    Blazeby, Jane
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 26 - 27
  • [49] Defining non-inferiority margins in randomised controlled surgical trials: a protocol for a systematic review
    Kuemmerli, Christoph
    Gallagher, Iain J.
    Skipworth, Richard
    Laird, Barry
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (08): : 1 - 4
  • [50] Prospective Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Eczema Treatments: A Systematic Review
    Nankervis, Helen
    Baibergenova, Akerke
    Williams, Hywel C.
    Thomas, Kim S.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 132 (12) : 2727 - 2734